Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 27,586 to 27,600 of 49714
-
08-05-21 21:51 #22129Banned Member

Posts: 466I sure would feel stupid with that kind of outlay of cash to a prostitute.
Originally Posted by TDLeafs
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 21:50 #22128Senior Member

Posts: 308Very Interesting
I'm not saying I totally disagree with the fine analysis on this topic, but how would the increase in new agencies be explained away? Increasing rates is a legitimate business strategy for somewhat standardized hourly work, specifically when the professional is fully booked. The loss in customers is made up by the the increased rate. The difference is that the services offered in AAMPs is non-standardized. The top of the food chain can find a new market clearing rate. But, probably because of self esteem issues, the other girls feel compelled to also try. I bet not a single one of them flashed on the ideas that if they didn't raise their rate they might get more business, or at least sustain the business they already have.
We are in a period of price discovery. I don't think there is any "institutional memory" in the AAMP game. There will eventually be a sustainable market clearing price and certain types of women that willing to give it a go! In economics there are supposed to be substitutes for almost everything. They might be "better", or they might be "worse". I started out in the AMPs. And, even though I can't imagine it at this point in time, if everything got shitty enough, I suppose I could go back there!
Originally Posted by Jack926
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 21:35 #22127Senior Member

Posts: 255Ok
I PMd you where you can find photos.
Originally Posted by DblEspresso
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 21:26 #22126Senior Member

Posts: 3480You know they're lying if their lips are moving. Got to take hearsay with a grain of salt in this business.
Originally Posted by TDLeafs
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 21:23 #22125Senior Member

Posts: 1245What a simp.
Originally Posted by TDLeafs
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 21:08 #22124Senior Member

Posts: 308Suri
Try again thanks.
Originally Posted by EasyPeasyDong
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 21:03 #22123Senior Member

Posts: 244Suri
No China girl since David Bowie's song was better than Suri. She was awesome service wise. Can't forget that chair.
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 20:50 #22122Senior Member

Posts: 77820 K a month?
Had interesting conversation with Kgirl recently.
She has a friend who gets allowance of 20 K from monger. About 20 yrs older than her.
Also got BMW from him and countless fancy designer bags.
Man to be rich and able to spend.
-
08-05-21 20:34 #22121Senior Member

Posts: 3480That's just a matter of taste.
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 20:30 #22120Senior Member

Posts: 255Toys apparently.
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
His pants are always falling down too.
LMAO.
-
08-05-21 20:10 #22119Senior Member

Posts: 2553 hours
You saw Suri right?
Originally Posted by WaterBottle323
[View Original Post]
3 hours wasn't enough time if you saw her once.
Best ever.
-
08-05-21 20:08 #22118Senior Member

Posts: 255Mailbox
I PM'd you but your mailbox is full.
Originally Posted by DblEspresso
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 20:05 #22117Senior Member

Posts: 255Pre-pandemic is what I stated. I stated 3 hours for 220 per hour.
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
She has been gone from LA for approx. 4 years, because she left to Norcal until approx. mid to late 2018/2019.
She worked for Bay Area legend Sara.
She had issues with at least 2 "stalker" customers.
She is doing fine.
Sorry for the confusion.
-
08-05-21 19:28 #22116Senior Member

Posts: 308Suri
Is she still active? If she is she working in the bay area?
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
-
08-05-21 19:24 #22115Senior Member

Posts: 7217Suri, was overrated!
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
You're favorite China girl back in the day was better than Suri.














Reply With Quote










