Hot Young Asian Girls

**EasyPeasyDong** · 05-21-21 22:09

Originally Posted by JohnHada [View Original Post]

I've known her since 2014 ish, and hasn't she always been emotionless?

Yep. Great legs, nice tight pussy, hard to get a smile out of her or any passion.

Hot though.

**JohnHada** · 05-21-21 14:06

Originally Posted by Mmmmm00 [View Original Post]

Agreed. Venus can be very mechanic and emotionless. Doesn't even pretend to get excited to see you when you walk in. I still love her LOL.

I've known her since 2014 ish, and hasn't she always been emotionless?

**Mmmmm00** · 05-21-21 12:19

Originally Posted by Canon88 [View Original Post]

Finally got to see Elle / Venus today. There was a lot of hype. So my expectations were very high. Probably too high. Physically, yes she's pretty hot. Especially the body. Face is fine. Skin isn't that great and she had some weird dewy looking stuff on that made her face all shiny. Maybe that's a cool style these days, but just looked weird to me. She wasn't as tall as described either. A bit above average for a Korean girl. Fine. But the descriptions made her out to be a model-looking girl. Not quite there.

There was definitely something missing on the service front. I've gotten along with pretty much all the providers I've seen. No matter how hot or not they were. But she is a tough nut to crack. Maybe it was because it was my first time, but to earn repeat business, you have to make a good first impression. Not sure I want to invest seeing her a few more times to find out if she gets better vs some sure things.

BBBJ was nice. Seemed like she really enjoyed it. Kissing was below average for sure. Tits were a bit too fake for me. Overall, very business-like and it got the job done. But nothing compared to the legends of several years ago. And even the legends still working today are still a better overall experience for me. In their prime. They performed like rock-stars. No attitude to crack. Now, they might have a bit saggier tits, and perhaps the butt isn't as tight anymore. But classier, sexier, and they know how to treat you well.

Agreed. Venus can be very mechanic and emotionless. Doesn't even pretend to get excited to see you when you walk in. I still love her LOL.

**DarkSide5** · 05-21-21 01:55

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

How would you describe hair now?

Her hair is short and blonde.

**KingsFoil** · 05-20-21 11:42

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Lowering one's expectations is one of the most underrated pro-tips in this hobby.

Use the pictures only for keeping track of girls as they switch bookers and names, and not for trying to figure out what they look like. For the latter, learn the tastes of the reviewers by seeing who they see, and comparing your tastes with theirs so you can accurately triangulate to your own preference.

**BonerAppetitty** · 05-20-21 11:39

SsStuntCock and BuddaHead just gave the best advice for this hobby.

As I may be the most vanguard of boners, most reviews can't really help me. For the rare girls I am clueless about, I read the most positive reviews. My Boner Radar and Boner Sense (BS detector) are pretty good so I just need a reason to bang.

Girls like Hana, Pink, etc are no brainers to me. I would bang them even sooner if they had no reviews for the first few days.

When I TOFTT, I hope to find a HYA girl but expect to see an overweight average looking MILF. I am not even turned off by overweight MILF!

If boner is awake, I would bang ANY Kgirl LOL If she fits, I hit!

This is why I need more brothers like OneADay here. The goal of this thread is for brothers like me. We share. We bang or we move on! Always on the hunt for HYA girl.

Originally Posted by SsStuntCock [View Original Post]

Lowering one's expectations is one of the most underrated pro-tips in this hobby.

**SsStuntCock** · 05-20-21 11:36

Originally Posted by DarkSide5 [View Original Post]

I finally got around to seeing Angel. She is the epitome of HYA to me. I was hesitant for the longest time because some of you had said she sort of had a gut. To my surprise, she looks younger and skinnier than her pics with her new hair style.

How would you describe hair now?

**DarkSide5** · 05-20-21 09:32

I finally got around to seeing Angel. She is the epitome of HYA to me. I was hesitant for the longest time because some of you had said she sort of had a gut. To my surprise, she looks younger and skinnier than her pics with her new hair style. She is very thin with wiry arms and a butt that isn't as flat as we've seen with others. She isn't great with service but that actually supports her young non-pro background. Or maybe she has been in the game in a long time and is super lazy. Either way, she isn't responsive in DATY but is open to DFK and is super tight. Is there anyone out there that looks younger than her at the moment? If so, I haven't found that person yet. Definite repeat for me.

**SuperMan333** · 05-20-21 01:28

Originally Posted by OneADay [View Original Post]

Everyone, I am sorry you feel I let you down with my Soo-Ah recommendation. I am going to self penalize myself by seeing a MILF tomorrow before I allow myself more HYA pussy (have Soo-Ah booked on Friday for our 4th meeting, as she is still HYA to me). Sorry.

Yeah I also saw her based on HYA recommendation. She looks just a little above average and I won't be repeating. Hopefully going forward we don't throw around the term HYA loosely on any new talents we get.

**Ghost626** · 05-20-21 00:39

Originally Posted by Thud1 [View Original Post]

Agree with you 100% also. I saw her when she first arrived with M. Amazing energy and checks all boxes on service. But, her look did not do it for me either. In my opinion, her tits are saggy and unattractive. I would give her a 6. 5 in looks. A non-repeat for me. I have to have the eye candy to make it worth my time and money.

When I first saw Hana I thought I got bait and switch. Her look are more like 7 to me. But I repeat with Hana cause of her excellent service.

**Canon88** · 05-19-21 20:47

Finally got to see Elle / Venus today. There was a lot of hype. So my expectations were very high. Probably too high. Physically, yes she's pretty hot. Especially the body. Face is fine. Skin isn't that great and she had some weird dewy looking stuff on that made her face all shiny. Maybe that's a cool style these days, but just looked weird to me. She wasn't as tall as described either. A bit above average for a Korean girl. Fine. But the descriptions made her out to be a model-looking girl. Not quite there.

There was definitely something missing on the service front. I've gotten along with pretty much all the providers I've seen. No matter how hot or not they were. But she is a tough nut to crack. Maybe it was because it was my first time, but to earn repeat business, you have to make a good first impression. Not sure I want to invest seeing her a few more times to find out if she gets better vs some sure things.

BBBJ was nice. Seemed like she really enjoyed it. Kissing was below average for sure. Tits were a bit too fake for me. Overall, very business-like and it got the job done. But nothing compared to the legends of several years ago. And even the legends still working today are still a better overall experience for me. In their prime. They performed like rock-stars. No attitude to crack. Now, they might have a bit saggier tits, and perhaps the butt isn't as tight anymore. But classier, sexier, and they know how to treat you well.

**AlexisDavis** · 05-19-21 19:31

Originally Posted by Thud1 [View Original Post]

Soo-Ah. Just saw her this afternoon. If BA saw her now, he would pull his certification. 2 years ago she may have met the criteria of young and slender. But, now? Oh no. She is thick and a stumpy monkey. I was expecting a slim and HYA, but was hugely disappointed. Photos do not represent her at all. Slightly in the doll face, but body looks like a potato. No repeat. Not even a slight thought of repeat.

Also saw her today—I would not go this harsh, but I agree I would not recommend her myself personally. I found that her face is quite similar to the photos, and it's definitely her, but heavily photoshopped. Agreed she is not slender by any means, definitely on the thicker side with disproportionally smaller boobs. Service was amateur-ish. She's very vocal, but obviously faking it.

It wasn't a bad time by any means, but certainly not one to write home about. It felt a lot like when I saw Joan. No repeat for me either.

**Stgermaine** · 05-19-21 17:34

Originally Posted by Thud1 [View Original Post]

Soo-Ah. Just saw her this afternoon. If BA saw her now, he would pull his certification. 2 years ago she may have met the criteria of young and slender. But, now? Oh no. She is thick and a stumpy monkey. I was expecting a slim and HYA, but was hugely disappointed. Photos do not represent her at all. Slightly in the doll face, but body looks like a potato. No repeat. Not even a slight thought of repeat.

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

Having a healthy debate on different viewpoints is good. There won't be agreement on standards for looks, but people can provide their opinions and descriptions supporting their opinions. Personally. I look at the lower ratings (esp. If there are more than 1) as opposed to the highest ratings since those may be people who prefer that particular body type / look or overly enthusiastic. The lower ratings give an alternate perspective that I consider when deciding whether to see someone.

On the theme of balanced perspective, my experience with Soo-ah is a middle of the road experience. Far from the best but not a huge disappointment. I did go in with larger expectations than I did on my recent outings, but at the end of the day I had a good session with a demure agreeable girl. Not a nympho who is starved for sex but not a corpse in the sheets. Could tone up but stumpy monkey is too harsh a verdict. Face was meh for me but that's just my opinion.

**SsStuntCock** · 05-19-21 16:35

Originally Posted by BuddhaHead [View Original Post]

Personally. I look at the lower ratings (esp. If there are more than 1) as opposed to the highest ratings since those may be people who prefer that particular body type / look or overly enthusiastic. The lower ratings give an alternate perspective that I consider when deciding whether to see someone.

Lowering one's expectations is one of the most underrated pro-tips in this hobby.

**BuddhaHead** · 05-19-21 12:21

Originally Posted by FiatVoluptas [View Original Post]

Maybe there needs to be a new thread: "Fat or not?

I am kidding, but it seems that a large portion of posts are now guys arguing over the relative perceived fatness / thickness of girls. I wish there was a more objective way to describe girls so we could avoid this constant debate, because it doesn't seem to be useful to most people.

Having a healthy debate on different viewpoints is good. There won't be agreement on standards for looks, but people can provide their opinions and descriptions supporting their opinions. Personally. I look at the lower ratings (esp. If there are more than 1) as opposed to the highest ratings since those may be people who prefer that particular body type / look or overly enthusiastic. The lower ratings give an alternate perspective that I consider when deciding whether to see someone.