Hot Young Asian Girls

[SuperMan333]

Everyone, I am sorry you feel I let you down with my Soo-Ah recommendation. I am going to self penalize myself by seeing a MILF tomorrow before I allow myself more HYA pussy (have Soo-Ah booked on Friday for our 4th meeting, as she is still HYA to me). Sorry.

Yeah I also saw her based on HYA recommendation. She looks just a little above average and I won't be repeating. Hopefully going forward we don't throw around the term HYA loosely on any new talents we get.

[Ghost626]

Agree with you 100% also. I saw her when she first arrived with M. Amazing energy and checks all boxes on service. But, her look did not do it for me either. In my opinion, her tits are saggy and unattractive. I would give her a 6. 5 in looks. A non-repeat for me. I have to have the eye candy to make it worth my time and money.

When I first saw Hana I thought I got bait and switch. Her look are more like 7 to me. But I repeat with Hana cause of her excellent service.

[Canon88]

Finally got to see Elle / Venus today. There was a lot of hype. So my expectations were very high. Probably too high. Physically, yes she's pretty hot. Especially the body. Face is fine. Skin isn't that great and she had some weird dewy looking stuff on that made her face all shiny. Maybe that's a cool style these days, but just looked weird to me. She wasn't as tall as described either. A bit above average for a Korean girl. Fine. But the descriptions made her out to be a model-looking girl. Not quite there.

There was definitely something missing on the service front. I've gotten along with pretty much all the providers I've seen. No matter how hot or not they were. But she is a tough nut to crack. Maybe it was because it was my first time, but to earn repeat business, you have to make a good first impression. Not sure I want to invest seeing her a few more times to find out if she gets better vs some sure things.

BBBJ was nice. Seemed like she really enjoyed it. Kissing was below average for sure. Tits were a bit too fake for me. Overall, very business-like and it got the job done. But nothing compared to the legends of several years ago. And even the legends still working today are still a better overall experience for me. In their prime. They performed like rock-stars. No attitude to crack. Now, they might have a bit saggier tits, and perhaps the butt isn't as tight anymore. But classier, sexier, and they know how to treat you well.

[AlexisDavis]

Soo-Ah. Just saw her this afternoon. If BA saw her now, he would pull his certification. 2 years ago she may have met the criteria of young and slender. But, now? Oh no. She is thick and a stumpy monkey. I was expecting a slim and HYA, but was hugely disappointed. Photos do not represent her at all. Slightly in the doll face, but body looks like a potato. No repeat. Not even a slight thought of repeat.

Also saw her today—I would not go this harsh, but I agree I would not recommend her myself personally. I found that her face is quite similar to the photos, and it's definitely her, but heavily photoshopped. Agreed she is not slender by any means, definitely on the thicker side with disproportionally smaller boobs. Service was amateur-ish. She's very vocal, but obviously faking it.

It wasn't a bad time by any means, but certainly not one to write home about. It felt a lot like when I saw Joan. No repeat for me either.

[Stgermaine]

Soo-Ah. Just saw her this afternoon. If BA saw her now, he would pull his certification. 2 years ago she may have met the criteria of young and slender. But, now? Oh no. She is thick and a stumpy monkey. I was expecting a slim and HYA, but was hugely disappointed. Photos do not represent her at all. Slightly in the doll face, but body looks like a potato. No repeat. Not even a slight thought of repeat.

Having a healthy debate on different viewpoints is good. There won't be agreement on standards for looks, but people can provide their opinions and descriptions supporting their opinions. Personally. I look at the lower ratings (esp. If there are more than 1) as opposed to the highest ratings since those may be people who prefer that particular body type / look or overly enthusiastic. The lower ratings give an alternate perspective that I consider when deciding whether to see someone.

On the theme of balanced perspective, my experience with Soo-ah is a middle of the road experience. Far from the best but not a huge disappointment. I did go in with larger expectations than I did on my recent outings, but at the end of the day I had a good session with a demure agreeable girl. Not a nympho who is starved for sex but not a corpse in the sheets. Could tone up but stumpy monkey is too harsh a verdict. Face was meh for me but that's just my opinion.

[SsStuntCock]

Personally. I look at the lower ratings (esp. If there are more than 1) as opposed to the highest ratings since those may be people who prefer that particular body type / look or overly enthusiastic. The lower ratings give an alternate perspective that I consider when deciding whether to see someone.

Lowering one's expectations is one of the most underrated pro-tips in this hobby.

[BuddhaHead]

Maybe there needs to be a new thread: "Fat or not?

I am kidding, but it seems that a large portion of posts are now guys arguing over the relative perceived fatness / thickness of girls. I wish there was a more objective way to describe girls so we could avoid this constant debate, because it doesn't seem to be useful to most people.

Having a healthy debate on different viewpoints is good. There won't be agreement on standards for looks, but people can provide their opinions and descriptions supporting their opinions. Personally. I look at the lower ratings (esp. If there are more than 1) as opposed to the highest ratings since those may be people who prefer that particular body type / look or overly enthusiastic. The lower ratings give an alternate perspective that I consider when deciding whether to see someone.

[Thud1]

I try out a lot of the HYA girls you mention (though I suspect you always keep a few hidden) as my taste is similarly varied like yours. I am proud Soo-Ah has already been officially BA Certified so I have some cover once someone sees her and complains of a misplaced mole or something.

Soo-Ah. Just saw her this afternoon. If BA saw her now, he would pull his certification. 2 years ago she may have met the criteria of young and slender. But, now? Oh no. She is thick and a stumpy monkey. I was expecting a slim and HYA, but was hugely disappointed. Photos do not represent her at all. Slightly in the doll face, but body looks like a potato. No repeat. Not even a slight thought of repeat.

[WaterBottle323]

She was one of my top ATFs but nobody cared when I shared LOL (click here). Most guys either complain a girl is not hot enough or service not good enough so I may stay silent for some time.

I think her pics are real but P.S. Beyond recognition in the face. She used those same pics when I reviewed her in 2019 though. I can still recognize her face and body in the pic in black top. I really like her face and body. She reminded me of someone I knew so that was a plus.

I was going to post about her as HYA girl but I am glad you did. My review sucks so I like it better when someone else does it. Good to see you back sharing and posting your list again.

She looks in her early 30's from what I see, a feeling of somebody's young wife. Pretty face, body-wise not fat not skinny not athletic still okay looking.

[Thud1]

After all the raves about Hana and how hot she was I had to try her out. TBH I was disappointed. Her face and teeth are not good. She has acne. On the bright side, she is bubbly, definitely aims to please and can take a good pounding. She always goes for 2 shots, and maybe you can get 3 if you are a quick shot. She let me do any position, standing, sideways, wheelbarrow, you name it. PSE with no upcharge. The bang for your buck is definitely there and she will let you fuck her for the full hour, unlike any other provider. Service was fucking amazing, top tier, and would repeat, but looks... They just aren't there. I thought about leaving when the door opened, but I had to see what all the fuss was about. Not even close to the same ballpark as Rie, Venus, or Ravi.

To me she is just not hot.

Agree with you 100% also. I saw her when she first arrived with M. Amazing energy and checks all boxes on service. But, her look did not do it for me either. In my opinion, her tits are saggy and unattractive. I would give her a 6. 5 in looks. A non-repeat for me. I have to have the eye candy to make it worth my time and money.

[Veni1]

Maybe there needs to be a new thread: "Fat or not?

I am kidding, but it seems that a large portion of posts are now guys arguing over the relative perceived fatness / thickness of girls. I wish there was a more objective way to describe girls so we could avoid this constant debate, because it doesn't seem to be useful to most people.

A lot of gals list their measurements in their ads. Of course they can be stretching the truth there also. However if a gal lists D or DD tits, I would bet that in no way she is "petite", yet I have seen reviewers list a gal that way when her stats are 5'0", 115 lbs, 34 D-24-36. It's not foolproof, but reading between the lines can help.

[OneADay]

She used to be skinny a few years ago but is kinda thicc now.

It is possible she gained a couple of pounds since you saw her, but zero people walking by Soo-Ah on the street would call her "tick". She is petite and not thick and definitely not tick.

[VegasMongRoll]

Starting on Thursday according to Bookergray site in OC.

She has a sexy curvy body type exactly like the bottom 3-4 photos on BG site which I think is just princess2 garden girls anyway.

Age appearance upper 20's so I guess she belong in this thread, read my review for her on TER.

[BobLove]

She was one of my top ATFs but nobody cared when I shared LOL (click here). Most guys either complain a girl is not hot enough or service not good enough so I may stay silent for some time.

I think her pics are real but P.S. Beyond recognition in the face. She used those same pics when I reviewed her in 2019 though. I can still recognize her face and body in the pic in black top. I really like her face and body. She reminded me of someone I knew so that was a plus.

I was going to post about her as HYA girl but I am glad you did. My review sucks so I like it better when someone else does it. Good to see you back sharing and posting your list again.

She used to be skinny a few years ago but is kinda thicc now.

[Facetious997]

She was one of my top ATFs but nobody cared when I shared LOL (click here). Most guys either complain a girl is not hot enough or service not good enough so I may stay silent for some time.

I think her pics are real but P.S. Beyond recognition in the face. She used those same pics when I reviewed her in 2019 though. I can still recognize her face and body in the pic in black top. I really like her face and body. She reminded me of someone I knew so that was a plus.

I was going to post about her as HYA girl but I am glad you did. My review sucks so I like it better when someone else does it. Good to see you back sharing and posting your list again.

I saw her in the past at your recommendation. Gosh it's actually almost 2 years since then. I tried to book her again, booker told me earliest was 9 PM (her last time) so the hype is definitely caught up. Booker recommended a new girl instead, Cream, said she was "young and v cute " exactly as is. I ran.