Escort Reports

**Bunker Buster** · 05-21-21 16:32

Originally Posted by MiRoad [View Original Post]

Absolutely agree. Zariah was great when pregnant. Only downside was no CIP. Sorry to see her off the circuit and now making money from porn videos and her pay-per-view website. Pregnant providers are more likely to go for BBFS than non-pregnant girls.

I last saw her over a year ago, and she was doing BBFS and BB greek to completion.

During the shutdown, she would text me links to pay her for porn, which I never did. She'd always been prone to get pissy about minor things, and when she started seeing people again last summer, she was unpleasant towards me, so I moved on.

**Kickass123** · 05-21-21 11:37

Originally Posted by ParisT312 [View Original Post]

Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?

Visited with both, I would recommend Singha by a slight margin. Both are professionals, I remember that Singha has a tat. Not too large. Don't recall if Peach does or not.

In both cases, the massage was almost non-existent, though. My one pet peeve with Singha was that for an hour she would allow for just one shot. I would expect that if I pay for the whole hour, I can get some action for the duration. But still service is excellent for the first. I always leave with a smile and a peck in the cheek. Hope this helps. Good luck.

**Mongeroose** · 05-21-21 09:30

Originally Posted by DmvTrickGawd [View Original Post]

Yes. I've dreamed of Darryn a few times. She's a classy older MILF. She does make quite an effort to put on make up and look sexy. She's also reliable. Most of my dreams have been for $. 2 for a qv. She might go bbj if your hygiene is up to par. And it's excellent. She can take it deep and instructions well. Nice and sloppy if you ask. Once time she went slow and I still came early. It felt that good. If you get a chance, go see her. I will again soon.

Agree on Darryn's service, but her current location is a pain. Nearest free parking is two blocks away, and she has to meet you at the elevator to get to her floor. Customers should also know that she smokes (can hardly tell in the room) and has a dog that likes to watch.

**Navajo101** · 05-21-21 08:53

Originally Posted by ParisT312 [View Original Post]

Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?

No tats on Peach. My neighbor saw Singha a couple of years ago and seems to remember a fairly large tat on Singhas back. Maybe someone else has a better recollection.

**ParisT312** · 05-20-21 23:15

Hey guys, I'm looking to try out some Thai this month. Who would you recommend b / w these two? Both of them seem of have average to voluptuous bodies and decent service. They have a ton of reviews on TER but I wasn't sure if either of them are tattooed up. I'm fine with small tattoos but not in to full sleeve or larger tatts. Any recommendations?

**MiRoad** · 05-20-21 23:12

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.

Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.

Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.

I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.

The answer is, it depends.

Absolutely agree. Zariah was great when pregnant. Only downside was no CIP. Sorry to see her off the circuit and now making money from porn videos and her pay-per-view website. Pregnant providers are more likely to go for BBFS than non-pregnant girls.

**Bunker Buster** · 05-20-21 20:01

Originally Posted by PSmith0380 [View Original Post]

Do the pregos allow BBFS?

Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23 [View Original Post]

I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.

Over half of the preggos I've seen have been fine with BBFS.

Skinny Zariah (who was pregnant last year but still does BBFS) would ask you to pull out, but for extra you could finish inside her ass.

Texas Shannon (lots of tattoos, advertises three inputs) was crazed for BB when she was pregnant 7-8 years ago, but doesn't do it anymore.

I can think of at least 4 others who also did BBFS, but only 3-4 who required covers.

The answer is, it depends.

**FunDreams** · 05-20-21 17:11

Originally Posted by FunDreams [View Original Post]

Might give her a try depending where she's at.

No return on texts and her phone now appears to be disconnected.

**FunDreams** · 05-20-21 16:15

Originally Posted by SexFrustrate23 [View Original Post]

I imagine not. Almost all escorts require a condom because they don't want an STD.

Might give her a try depending where she's at.

**Lobsid** · 05-20-21 15:49

Found a girl in Seeking Arrangements who was pregnant over a year ago. I creampie her a few times. It's out there you just have to look around.

P.S.: delete and block her number, because she kept asking for money. So don't msg me for it.

Originally Posted by PSmith0380 [View Original Post]

Do the pregos allow BBFS?

**HardanFast** · 05-20-21 12:54

Because the original message had no link, I thought you were talking about the Asian Samantha that several of us know, not the nycgirl one you know. The Orange County website, which is down now, used the same photos as CVIP. The TER number for her in OC is 357607 and is still active.

Originally Posted by Rhinopole [View Original Post]

I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.

Hope this helps.

**Rhinopole** · 05-20-21 10:16

Originally Posted by HardanFast [View Original Post]

I saw her recently right after she returned to the area. I agree about the age, and she has gained about 15 pounds from when she was here several months ago. Also, are you sure you are looking at the right Samantha on TER when you say she is on there? When I checked, I saw no mention of her in this area anymore and the only thing I could find were 3 reviews from a couple of months ago in Irvine, CA (search on Orange County). Interestingly enough, the link to Happy Zone where she worked there is also down with the same message as the one for CVIP. I will grant you that someone may have stolen her pictures and name, but she told me she had recently worked there when I saw her.

I can't be 100% positive, but here's what I know. When I found her on TER I was able to see some pics and general information available. Today I saw someone who last saw her 12+ years ago posted this website for her: http://www.nycgirl.net. The pics on this website are the same as those I saw on TER. The other thing is that I'd last spoken with her on the phone before COVID-19 hit. I'm sure when I contacted her recently it was the same woman. So my conclusion is that this is really Samantha. And my memory of when I was a TER member and read her full reviews, other guys commented on her age being in the 50 ties. So if she told a guy who posted recently that she's 60, that also fits. The pics of her on http://www.nycgirl.net are old, but IMHO for a GLIF she looks darn good. Then again, I'm in my 70 ties.

Hope this helps.

**Navajo101** · 05-20-21 08:09

Originally Posted by Xquisitely4 [View Original Post]

Talk about a blast from the past. I've seen her a few times approx 12+ years ago. Pics have not changed. Link below of her website.

http://www.nycgirl.net

My landscaper has visited a couple of time over the last 2 years. She's a cool gilf. Easy to talk to and good consistent service. Pics are about 20+ years old, but she's upfront about it. He said the price point is consistent with the service. She good in a pinch.