Korean Agency BB

[Kent747]

Man I remember back when you can filter to just 8 and above. The lack of discrete ratings and verified reviews really hurt everyone.

I haven't seen a 9 in a good while. Honestly for the 5 and below I am not sure how they even have business. Surely the causal monger can google and find this forum?

The current scene basically is made of local K girls who are older and MILFs vs constant flow of FOB 20's cuties due to various reasons. Most are 4-7 now days and rarely 8+ girls.

[Devlee2]

She look anything like her photos?

Report on Cindy with Eukgirls:

Body is somewhat similar to the photos. Slim, petite frame but still somewhat curvy. Breasts are decent sized but not large, B cup sounds about right. Seem to be natural. Her legs aren't as long as the photo and face isn't nearly as pretty as the photo, but she's still cute, and has large, round cat-like eyes.

Her english is pretty decent and she is friendly and communicative. Very engaged throughout the session and knows how to make a guy feel comfortable.

Good bodyrub in shower. No preview BBBJ but its a sensual shower. She grabbed my cock from behind while I was turned around and gave me a mini-soapy handjob, which was pretty hot.

In the bedroom, good amount of DFK and LFK. BBBJ technique seemed decent but nothing special. Went and did DATY on her and she's the type that will actually touch you. Ran her hands through my hair which I didn't mind. Good sensual GFE experience.

Did not try for BBFS with her and doubt she would have accepted. Every now and then she'd say something to herself in Korean which was kinda cute. I would consider repeating.

Is she young?

[LonerRanger]

The look thing is REALLY YMMV. I think Cona is an "8.5"; Megan is a "6", Chanel is "8" and Allie is a "8.5" and Heaven is a "8". I think Leah is definitely "5" and I am sure some guys disagree with me but as they say, different strokes for different folks. I think Leah was also a "5".

For looks I would rate.

Megan 8. 5.

Cona 8. 0.

Chanel 8. 0.

Allie 7. 5.

[ILoveKGirls]

I just glanced at terb right now.

I see the girls that cost $200 USD or less, but their faces are all hidden. Not even partially obscured or blurred, which makes for a huge surprise when they open the door. I bet the reason they're that cheap is because of butterface.

Look at this funny shit that charges $300 CAD. I'd rather fuck my own hand with lotion. Even Lia looked better than this. Be happy that all of M's girls at least look better than this.

I'm fucking dying of laughter rn. That is one unbelievable Korean WG.

She looks like she can be North Korean. Shit, she looks like she can be Kim Jong Un. Same tits and everything. Fuck that picture is so funny. Almost looks like a joke.

[Veni1]

Pics are pretty accurate in my experience.

If you go to the monkey site and search for her name you will get a different set of pictures. She can also be found at: www.gfemonkey.com. In the current SAG pics she looks a bit thinner. If I recall, the comments about her from a number of reviews was that she was on the "thick" side. However, it was reported that she was BBFS friendly. But to be fair, I haven't seen her personally so this post is just based upon "hearsay".

[QuestBMuffin]

The look thing is REALLY YMMV. I think Cona is an "8.5"; Megan is a "6", Chanel is "8" and Allie is a "8.5" and Heaven is a "8". I think Leah is definitely "5" and I am sure some guys disagree with me but as they say, different strokes for different folks. I think Leah was also a "5".

Man I remember back when you can filter to just 8 and above. The lack of discrete ratings and verified reviews really hurt everyone.

I haven't seen a 9 in a good while. Honestly for the 5 and below I am not sure how they even have business. Surely the causal monger can google and find this forum?

[QuestBMuffin]

Anyone have experience with girls at SAG and if the photos are reliable at all? Right now they have an Erika and want to bite the bullet but if anyone else has been with this agency let me know what you think.

Pics are pretty accurate in my experience.

[MeatMeat]

Seems like we have positive reviews on M. I'm really into kgirls and want to know how can I contact the booker. Thanks!

[NintyNine]

Been seeing Chanel for a few months now and I think the sessions are getting stale. I noticed a change of her behavior (maybe to due to burnout) but she seems less enthusiastic and fun as the sessions before. She gets tried more easily and seems less responsive to do something, sort of going through the motions. Is this just me or anyone esle who has seen her lately get this too? I even took a break from seeing her for two weeks and it seems more or less not as good as before. I might replace her as my ATF with Lora or someone esle..

Chanel must be decently attractive if you've seen her that much. Sounds like maybe she's complacent with you, having seen her so many times. She might seem fresh from a new customer's view.

I'm surprised she hasn't returned to the bay area yet.

[NintyNine]

Check TERB for more info on Toronto. Being from there, I can tell you it's a better scene up there in general. Quality of talent is higher, quality of service is higher, rates are similar to what you'd find here, but in CAD, so that's a 30% discount when you factor in the FX rate. I'd never fly out there just for the sake of hobbying, but if you're going to be in the neighborhood anyways, why not check out the scene.

I just glanced at terb right now.

I see the girls that cost $200 USD or less, but their faces are all hidden. Not even partially obscured or blurred, which makes for a huge surprise when they open the door. I bet the reason they're that cheap is because of butterface.

Look at this funny shit that charges $300 CAD. I'd rather fuck my own hand with lotion. Even Lia looked better than this. Be happy that all of M's girls at least look better than this.

[TheAbc]

Been seeing Chanel for a few months now and I think the sessions are getting stale. I noticed a change of her behavior (maybe to due to burnout) but she seems less enthusiastic and fun as the sessions before. She gets tried more easily and seems less responsive to do something, sort of going through the motions. Is this just me or anyone esle who has seen her lately get this too? I even took a break from seeing her for two weeks and it seems more or less not as good as before. I might replace her as my ATF with Lora or someone esle.

On another note, does anyone still see Namu? I don't think she gets much business nowadays. Still on the fence, but seems like her quality went down and I make it a bad habit of texting her when I'm horny. My dick says yes, but my brain says no. I thought about just hitting her for a quick session but with the amount of driving, I might as well do a full session with a better girl. I can't seem to find a good late night quick BBFS bootie call on a weekday.

[NintyNine]

Nah man. You want 5's and 6's, you go to the Palace. That shit is one tier lower than M.

[Jack926]

M girls may not be the best in looks but I wouldn't say 5-6 in looks. M has the best performers around IMHO. FOSTA changed things because I think non-BB guys stop coming. It's supply and demand and we get what we paid for.

I will be coming so fast when I see M has cute new young girl BB or not.

The look thing is REALLY YMMV. I think Cona is an "8.5"; Megan is a "6", Chanel is "8" and Allie is a "8.5" and Heaven is a "8". I think Leah is definitely "5" and I am sure some guys disagree with me but as they say, different strokes for different folks. I think Leah was also a "5".

[Toungsten]

M's girls are more like TER 7's and 8's. Recently she had one 6, Lia, but she was one of the best fucks I've had recently! Definitely a 9 in service so well worth it! Today's lineup of Megan, Cona, Lucia, and Chanel are all 7's and 8's IMHO.

Couldn't have said it better especially about Lia who was one of the best fucks of my life ever and I've been around pretty long.

[Jodandayo]

Anyone have experience with girls at SAG and if the photos are reliable at all? Right now they have an Erika and want to bite the bullet but if anyone else has been with this agency let me know what you think.

Hit or miss with SAG based on the girls I've seen in the past (none of them are available atm). Generally the pics have not been of the girls themselves but in a few cases they are fairly representative of their bodies (faces generally not as pretty).

Of the current lineup, Shannon's pics are reportedly real and I hear Taylor's pics are a good representation. Board has been pretty quiet about the rest of the girls AFAIK.