Escort Reviews

**SullyErna69** · 02-04-19 16:03

Originally Posted by TheRonFather [View Original Post]

I received the same text. Hoping to clear my schedule so I can make it. Sounds like a fun time.

Got the text this morning. She's looking for a DP today and a GB onTuesday. She's legit and wants to be used and filled up so if it's your thing then now is your chance. I have no idea how long this girl will be around. http://waterbury.skipthegames.com/fe...f/853403361974.

**SullyErna69** · 02-04-19 15:57

Originally Posted by Ilsw203 [View Original Post]

I have no doubt in my mind that she is one of the bests in CT. If not, the best. So I checked out her page and screening requirements. She requires employment information which in my experience during the TER days if a girl asked you for employment information you basically can't leave them a bad review, or they will blackmail you. Not saying Lucy is a bad provider but speaking in general. If a girl had an off day or did not perform to your expectations, you were shit out of luck if you had really provided her with your employment info.

Lucy is a good provider. I saw her 2 different times about 3 years ago. I wsnt blown away but we all have our own tastes and she and I just didn't click. I wrote a review of her on the oThER site and gave her an honest and generally favorable review. However, I rated her looks a 7 and I guess this was not acceptable for her. She proceeded to blow up my inbox and complained to the admins of that site attempting to discredit me and have my review removed. Thankfully, they asked for specifics and I was able to provide, in great detail, characteristics and traits about her, the location, and our visits which corroborated everything I wrote and the reviews stayed on the site.

It was very odd in my book because the review was a solid 7. 5. After looking more closely at the other reviews, mine was the lowest avg score. I can only imagine that she complained any time she didn't receive 8's or better.

Her screening at that time did not require a place of employment and no matter what, I would never provide that information. Hell, I refuse to give my real name no matter how legit the provider is.

My point is that unless a provider is going to give me all of her personal information outside of this hobby, then I refuse to give them mine. Lucy is legit and generally a good provider but we all have different tastes and if someone is okay with her screening process then I would recommend taking her for a spin at least once and form your own opinion.

**Ilsw203** · 02-04-19 14:15

Originally Posted by KingOfAllBlks [View Original Post]

She is the best in CT for sure.

I have no doubt in my mind that she is one of the bests in CT. If not, the best. So I checked out her page and screening requirements. She requires employment information which in my experience during the TER days if a girl asked you for employment information you basically can't leave them a bad review, or they will blackmail you. Not saying Lucy is a bad provider but speaking in general. If a girl had an off day or did not perform to your expectations, you were shit out of luck if you had really provided her with your employment info.

**BuyerBeware** · 02-04-19 13:37

Hello,

How did the GB gone this morning? I was unable to attend If someone would pm me the details I'd appreciate it.

**Member #6108** · 02-04-19 10:43

Originally Posted by Rebbie [View Original Post]

Been setting this girl advertising a lot lately, send TGTBT. Can anyone help?

https://cityxguide.com/escorts/203-4...53980-13490386

See Waterbury posts on her also. Go take the plung an report back.

**CtFlirt81** · 02-04-19 10:06

Originally Posted by BigMacDaddy [View Original Post]

No, you're not crazy. She's over priced for the services and you'd do better on eros. Same or cheaper and a lot more of what you want. I saw her once and it was my last. I posted her review here about a year ago. Everything I wanted was an upsell. I wasn't going to shell out 350/ hr for a standard GFE type date.

BMD.

Have to say that I'm getting the feeling that top-tier dreams are reacting to the lower-tiers raising their rates. And unfortunately as long as there are Johns willing to pay higher prices for less return, there's nothing to stop the raise.

**KingOfAllBlks** · 02-04-19 09:56

Originally Posted by SecretSadist [View Original Post]

I don't have any experience with Lucy recently, though I was a regular of hers when she first started out back in '02-04 time frame. She was hot as balls then too, and a solid provider. She was very accommodating but as time went on, and she could afford to do so, more rules were applied and the cost went up. To be expected of course. Once she became super popular I starting seeing others. She was a riot to talk to in those days too. If she's still like she was, she's probably worth every bit of her required cover charge.

She is the best in CT for sure.

**Woody50** · 02-04-19 07:49

Originally Posted by BigMacDaddy [View Original Post]

No, you're not crazy. She's over priced for the services and you'd do better on eros. Same or cheaper and a lot more of what you want. I saw her once and it was my last. I posted her review here about a year ago. Everything I wanted was an upsell. I wasn't going to shell out 350/ hr for a standard GFE type date.

BMD.

Brandi Lynn on Eros. Don't bother unless desperate.

Way fatter than pics, hosts in an RV in front of her house, sweaty. Not typical Eros quality.

**Big Mac Daddy** · 02-04-19 00:36

Originally Posted by SecretSadist [View Original Post]

I've been a regular of Amy Skye for a while and wanted to post a review. Spent a many-an-afternoon sneaking daydreams of this lovely woman and she's a decent overall provider Body wise she has what I love. She's shapely, medium top, pretty face, banging booty. Pierced throughout, including tongue. Gives a decent BBBJ. Lots of spit, hand action. Unfortunately no ball action, no rimming, no CIM. For that matter, body shots only, no facials. I've been blessed with a healthy load and I love to share. Preferably on the kisser. No dice there. I will give her credit, she has rules and she sticks to them regaedless of how much you dream of her. That being said, def gets into the visit. DATY, FIV, toy play. No Greek, no BBFS. Does like to play dress up and holy shit let me tell you, she dresses EXACTLY as you wish and plays the part well. Pigtailed cheerleader, secretary, you name it. I try to be creative with each visit. Meh on the massage, but that's not why I'm there. Energetic mish, happily grinds throughout K9 and makes it a challenge to not pop, for me anyway. Cowgirl was awesome and some funky stuff with a chair arm, probably doesn't have a name. Despite the rules (the only one that is really a bummer is the no mouth-ball action) she was a rockstar for the first few visits. Unfortunately, she recently upped her cover charge to the point that I can't regular anymore and honestly, I have to question the hr deposit due to the rules. For this kind of pay to play, other than BBFS, pretty much anything should be on the table IMO. Or I'm crazy. Maybe both.

No, you're not crazy. She's over priced for the services and you'd do better on eros. Same or cheaper and a lot more of what you want. I saw her once and it was my last. I posted her review here about a year ago. Everything I wanted was an upsell. I wasn't going to shell out 350/ hr for a standard GFE type date.

BMD.

**Ilsw203** · 02-03-19 23:53

Originally Posted by BlueFox141 [View Original Post]

First post is help me?

LOL and if this guy did any searching, he would have seen she was talked about a lot lately.

**Snowman2** · 02-03-19 23:51

Originally Posted by Rebbie [View Original Post]

Been setting this girl advertising a lot lately, send TGTBT. Can anyone help?

https://cityxguide.com/escorts/203-4...53980-13490386

Very well discussed in many threads on the board.

Spend some time reading not asking questions.

**Woody50** · 02-03-19 23:10

Originally Posted by Rebbie [View Original Post]

Been setting this girl advertising a lot lately, send TGTBT. Can anyone help?

https://cityxguide.com/escorts/203-4...53980-13490386

Some weren't impressed, I've had some good times. Boobs are new, I haven't seen her since the new bodywork was installed.

FWIW, I don't negotiate. If I don't like the price, I move on.

**BlueFox141** · 02-03-19 21:17

Originally Posted by Rebbie [View Original Post]

Been setting this girl advertising a lot lately, send TGTBT. Can anyone help?

https://cityxguide.com/escorts/203-4...53980-13490386

First post is help me?

**SecretSadist** · 02-03-19 20:57

I've been a regular of Amy Skye for a while and wanted to post a review. Spent a many-an-afternoon sneaking daydreams of this lovely woman and she's a decent overall provider Body wise she has what I love. She's shapely, medium top, pretty face, banging booty. Pierced throughout, including tongue. Gives a decent BBBJ. Lots of spit, hand action. Unfortunately no ball action, no rimming, no CIM. For that matter, body shots only, no facials. I've been blessed with a healthy load and I love to share. Preferably on the kisser. No dice there. I will give her credit, she has rules and she sticks to them regaedless of how much you dream of her. That being said, def gets into the visit. DATY, FIV, toy play. No Greek, no BBFS. Does like to play dress up and holy shit let me tell you, she dresses EXACTLY as you wish and plays the part well. Pigtailed cheerleader, secretary, you name it. I try to be creative with each visit. Meh on the massage, but that's not why I'm there. Energetic mish, happily grinds throughout K9 and makes it a challenge to not pop, for me anyway. Cowgirl was awesome and some funky stuff with a chair arm, probably doesn't have a name. Despite the rules (the only one that is really a bummer is the no mouth-ball action) she was a rockstar for the first few visits. Unfortunately, she recently upped her cover charge to the point that I can't regular anymore and honestly, I have to question the hr deposit due to the rules. For this kind of pay to play, other than BBFS, pretty much anything should be on the table IMO. Or I'm crazy. Maybe both.