"Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"

[Ripvan12]

This one keeps hitting me up, I think she needs some quick cash. But she wants 300 and hour, which I'm not going to do. I'm not in the mood to haggle, but if you wolves want to take a stab, go for it.

https://www.seeking.com/member/7e61a...3-e4b241a19650

One of my self imposed rules dealing in the sugar bowl is that any mention of time restraints by these SBs and I cut and run immediately. Time restraints scream PRO. $300 per hour for someone not vetted and no history of service? Nah. Not to say I haven't hit the $$$ per meet in the bowl before but those have come with overnight visits or MSOG and no mention of time restraints.

When I first joined SA, I used to ask "how much time will I have of yours" because I was still operating in escort mode and the land of clock watchers. The true SBs won't mention time or will answer you in a quizzical manner if you bring up time restraints. Most of them treat the session as a regular civvy date and things take a natural course.

Ripper.

[Airmantroy]

https://www.seeking.com/member/c4ae3...9-0b4df07c087c

Anyone ever check this one out. She wants $$ per meet, which is steep, I know. But she hits so many buttons for me, I can't help but consider it. My spidey senses are tingling though. Something seems off.

$200 per is the standard going rate for 2-3 hours. These girls don't work by the hour, if they do they aren't worth wasting your time on. I believe there was a review on her previously that she asked for money upfront, but I may have her confused.

[SoonerFan72]

This one keeps hitting me up, I think she needs some quick cash. But she wants 300 and hour, which I'm not going to do. I'm not in the mood to haggle, but if you wolves want to take a stab, go for it.

https://www.seeking.com/member/7e61a...3-e4b241a19650

[SoonerFan72]

Newbie here. I thought I read it's better to use pics from your social media. That way you can always claim someone stole the picture off your facebook page or whatever if they get sent out where they shouldn't.

Any other tips on best apps to text with, etc. ?

There are companies that have trolls on SA that harvest your phone number and picture, then post you on a "sex offender" website stating you solicited sex for money. Then they will conveniently provide links to services that can help get them removed for a fee. My advice, use a fake picture or two of someone that resembles you. And of course, a burner number like Google Voice. I've never had an issue once I have someone on the hook, I eventually send them a real pic once I feel they are legit.

[NGASugarMan]

Got bored with my one regular, and my other moved away. I decided to splurge for a SA month. I'm hoping to hit the college back in session newbie group too.

I forgot to add one more classification of chick on SA to my list:

Many / trany: Manish chick, or tranny. You decide, LOL! (I have nothing wrong with trans-gender people, I just don't want a man / dick anywhere near me, LOL!

RuthieJane.

https://www.seeking.com/member/3ba3d...6-82278c0a504a

Red flag was how quick she pinged me when my profile went live. Only a dude is that thirsty. Hahahaha.

Anyone have some intel on her? She was quick to point out she wanted a Dom and she's always on SA. Not passing the sniff test yet, but I really like her.

Graceb012.

https://www.seeking.com/member/a9dc6...4-d238582f7444

Happy hunting!

[SummaTaco]

https://www.seeking.com/member/c4ae3...9-0b4df07c087c

Anyone ever check this one out. She wants $$ per meet, which is steep, I know. But she hits so many buttons for me, I can't help but consider it. My spidey senses are tingling though. Something seems off.

[RogerOver]

Very soon your favorite uncle will be setting up shop on "Seeking" trying to buss "Daddies" for pandering- soliciting a prostitute. They're already doing it on Tinder and Plenty of Fish. Them fuckas won't stop until they give everyone a criminal record. Smh.

Already happening. Read on another thread about that very scenario where a dude was busted for handing over the cash before they got in the car.

Paying for pussy or sex acts in against the law. We all know it, and sugaring, particularly at the PPM level is simply another word for hooking. Why are we surprised?

[StudMonquie]

https://www.seeking.com/member/86cbc...3-c9bc0f719457

Has anyone had any dealings with Haley?

[PeteAppleSeed]

That's capital sin. You're not supposed to send pics of you ever! Under no circumstances.

No provider is worth it.

Google voice would be perfect if I was able to send pics without having to link my google voice number to my real number.

[Tudai]

Link google voice to google hangouts the send and receive pics and via g. Voice number via g. Hangouts app.

Google voice would be perfect if I was able to send pics without having to link my google voice number to my real number.

[Johnny Mapalo]

I don't know if it's FOSTA related or what, but SA is really working hard to strip out ideas that there's a pay-to-play aspect to their site. First they changed "Expectations" (I think it was called) that included "negotiable" and the like to "Lifestyle", and now overnight they've removed that section altogether. And it seems they've recently quietly rebranded from "Seeking Arrangement" to "Seeking". And if you don't know, they've gone to an automatic monthly rebilling. I'll miss the "Lifestyle" filter because I find most women listing "Substantial" or "Extravagant" aren't worth dealing with. I guess we'll see how things play out with the site. I thought it was working just fine already!

Very soon your favorite uncle will be setting up shop on "Seeking" trying to buss "Daddies" for pandering- soliciting a prostitute. They're already doing it on Tinder and Plenty of Fish. Them fuckas won't stop until they give everyone a criminal record. Smh.

[TroyWess]

I don't know if it's FOSTA related or what, but SA is really working hard to strip out ideas that there's a pay-to-play aspect to their site. First they changed "Expectations" (I think it was called) that included "negotiable" and the like to "Lifestyle", and now overnight they've removed that section altogether. And it seems they've recently quietly rebranded from "Seeking Arrangement" to "Seeking". And if you don't know, they've gone to an automatic monthly rebilling. I'll miss the "Lifestyle" filter because I find most women listing "Substantial" or "Extravagant" aren't worth dealing with. I guess we'll see how things play out with the site. I thought it was working just fine already!

[AllHailChet]

I generally use pics that are exclusive for the sugar bowl. I agree with the plausible deniability with social media pics, but I rather not go through that 20 question and be ided. On text app, I prefer Google voice, just make sure notification is turned off and you can just link it to you private email.

Google voice would be perfect if I was able to send pics without having to link my google voice number to my real number.

[Gca393]

I finally signed back up on SA, and was looking for intel on this young lady:

https://www.seeking.com/member/ba51f...0-bf6a7f3a9a71

Says she is in the Morrow area. She is stacked, and not shy. Looks like a stripper judging by her photos. Any info would be appreciated.

I've dealt with her, she only takes cashapp FIRST then meet; I kindly declined. $$ was what she wanted.

[Shizzy6969]

Newbie here. I thought I read it's better to use pics from your social media. That way you can always claim someone stole the picture off your facebook page or whatever if they get sent out where they shouldn't

Any other tips on best apps to text with, etc. ?

I generally use pics that are exclusive for the sugar bowl. I agree with the plausible deniability with social media pics, but I rather not go through that 20 question and be ided. On text app, I prefer Google voice, just make sure notification is turned off and you can just link it to you private email.