Thread: "Sugar Babies" and "Arrangements"
+
Add Report
Results 14,731 to 14,745 of 16364
-
08-02-18 17:37 #1634Senior Member

Posts: 484Use fake pics
There are companies that have trolls on SA that harvest your phone number and picture, then post you on a "sex offender" website stating you solicited sex for money. Then they will conveniently provide links to services that can help get them removed for a fee. My advice, use a fake picture or two of someone that resembles you. And of course, a burner number like Google Voice. I've never had an issue once I have someone on the hook, I eventually send them a real pic once I feel they are legit.
Originally Posted by DArrow404
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-18 17:17 #1633Senior Member

Posts: 68Back in the bowl.
Got bored with my one regular, and my other moved away. I decided to splurge for a SA month. I'm hoping to hit the college back in session newbie group too.
I forgot to add one more classification of chick on SA to my list:
Many / trany: Manish chick, or tranny. You decide, LOL! (I have nothing wrong with trans-gender people, I just don't want a man / dick anywhere near me, LOL!
RuthieJane.
https://www.seeking.com/member/3ba3d...6-82278c0a504a
Red flag was how quick she pinged me when my profile went live. Only a dude is that thirsty. Hahahaha.
Anyone have some intel on her? She was quick to point out she wanted a Dom and she's always on SA. Not passing the sniff test yet, but I really like her.
Graceb012.
https://www.seeking.com/member/a9dc6...4-d238582f7444
Happy hunting!
-
08-02-18 16:28 #1632Senior Member

Posts: 45Vietbabyy101
https://www.seeking.com/member/c4ae3...9-0b4df07c087c
Anyone ever check this one out. She wants $$ per meet, which is steep, I know. But she hits so many buttons for me, I can't help but consider it. My spidey senses are tingling though. Something seems off.
-
08-02-18 15:30 #1631Senior Member

Posts: 3177Already happening. Read on another thread about that very scenario where a dude was busted for handing over the cash before they got in the car.
Originally Posted by JohnnyMapalo
[View Original Post]
Paying for pussy or sex acts in against the law. We all know it, and sugaring, particularly at the PPM level is simply another word for hooking. Why are we surprised?
-
08-02-18 15:25 #1630Senior Member

Posts: 113Haley
https://www.seeking.com/member/86cbc...3-c9bc0f719457
Has anyone had any dealings with Haley?
-
08-02-18 14:06 #1629Senior Member

Posts: 329No pics
That's capital sin. You're not supposed to send pics of you ever! Under no circumstances.
No provider is worth it.
Originally Posted by AllHailChet
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-18 12:04 #1628Senior Member

Posts: 176Google Voice
Link google voice to google hangouts the send and receive pics and via g. Voice number via g. Hangouts app.
Originally Posted by AllHailChet
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-18 09:12 #1627Senior Member

Posts: 2044Don't worry
Very soon your favorite uncle will be setting up shop on "Seeking" trying to buss "Daddies" for pandering- soliciting a prostitute. They're already doing it on Tinder and Plenty of Fish. Them fuckas won't stop until they give everyone a criminal record. Smh.
Originally Posted by TroyWess
[View Original Post]
-
08-02-18 08:50 #1626Senior Member

Posts: 45SA changes
I don't know if it's FOSTA related or what, but SA is really working hard to strip out ideas that there's a pay-to-play aspect to their site. First they changed "Expectations" (I think it was called) that included "negotiable" and the like to "Lifestyle", and now overnight they've removed that section altogether. And it seems they've recently quietly rebranded from "Seeking Arrangement" to "Seeking". And if you don't know, they've gone to an automatic monthly rebilling. I'll miss the "Lifestyle" filter because I find most women listing "Substantial" or "Extravagant" aren't worth dealing with. I guess we'll see how things play out with the site. I thought it was working just fine already!
-
08-01-18 23:11 #1625Senior Member

Posts: 45Google voice would be perfect if I was able to send pics without having to link my google voice number to my real number.
Originally Posted by Shizzy6969
[View Original Post]
-
08-01-18 22:56 #1624Senior Member

Posts: 96Bambi
I've dealt with her, she only takes cashapp FIRST then meet; I kindly declined. $$ was what she wanted.
Originally Posted by SoonerFan72
[View Original Post]
-
08-01-18 22:41 #1623Senior Member

Posts: 95I generally use pics that are exclusive for the sugar bowl. I agree with the plausible deniability with social media pics, but I rather not go through that 20 question and be ided. On text app, I prefer Google voice, just make sure notification is turned off and you can just link it to you private email.
Originally Posted by DArrow404
[View Original Post]
-
08-01-18 16:59 #1622Senior Member

Posts: 194Newbie here. I thought I read it's better to use pics from your social media. That way you can always claim someone stole the picture off your facebook page or whatever if they get sent out where they shouldn't.
Originally Posted by Leep12
[View Original Post]
Any other tips on best apps to text with, etc. ?
-
08-01-18 13:31 #1621Senior Member

Posts: 182Nikkiiisixx1
Yeah, got the same offer a couple weeks back and then she went dark. We set something up but she never followed through.
Originally Posted by SoonerFan72
[View Original Post]
-
08-01-18 13:22 #1620Senior Member

Posts: 484Nikkiiisixx1
This one just flat out told me "300 and a hotel room, and I'm yours!" She said she needs to meet in Fairburn. I asked her to send me face pics, and she went quite. Might be a flake, not sure.
https://www.seeking.com/member/7e61a...3-e4b241a19650












Reply With Quote









