Korean girls

[WoolyMonger]

Saw Jisoo yesterday and have to say it was the worst experience I've had at GH.

My experience in chronological order:

She opens the door in a nice dress. Her body type is exactly my type. As always, different girl from the pictures but body type is similar. Looks to be late 30's maybe even early 40's. Go back to the room, give her the donation. Then shot of mouthwash and into the shower. Normally this is where most girls start getting more intimate. Nope, not with her. She literally cleans me off, tells me to step out of shower, closes the curtains and cleans herself while I'm drying. Pretty weird but whatever. Serious lack of intimacy so far. Get on the bed and straight to BBJ. Pretty average, nothing to write home about. Has very sensitive nipples so would not let me play with them too much. No DFK, just pecks. On goes the cover and she rides CG. She seems super disinterested. Honestly wanted to ask for my money back at this point and leave. But fuck it, I flip her over for doggy. I start kissing her buttcheeks and she tell me no. Again WTF. Eventually just pounded away in doggy to finish.

Overall, very disappointed. Not what I'm used to out of the GH girls. It has always been a GFE experience in the past with them (as it should be at that price point), but Jisoo is super mechanical. The cherry on top, she has a clock in her room that's 5 mins ahead. Wish I would have just spent the time and money at an AMP LOL.

[XandirHunt]

Interesting question. I've never seen or heard any of you guys in there. I have booked on the quarter hour before without issue, so it can't be that they're using a rigid schedule. How do they do it? Magic is the only thing that makes sense to me.

I think they work around that in a couple of ways. They may not schedule at the same time, but I'm sure they will when it's busy. That's why they may tell you to wait until they confirm the apt. And tell you to go up. They must have superior sound deadening in that apartment. Or, like you said, magic.

Sometimes it feels as if I stepped through some magical portal to fantasyland.

[AlAround]

Sure I'm not alone in preferring the GH gils with a Track rEcoRd so I can emptor me some caveat.

But of course that's why we're on this site too, looking for the word on what's what IRL.

So I've read about Pink now—Anybody had a dream with Jisoo yet?

Looks hot as hell, but how's the service, and is that the girl or close enough?

AA.

[DrLebowski]

Curious if anyone knows the actual answer to this random question. If a place opens lets say 9:00 and has two or three girls by appointment only. I'm guessing appointments are staggered to not run into each other, but I am not sure. Ie: one girl at 9:00 second at 9:30 and third maybe 10:00. Or are the girls actually back to back. First guy at 9 second at 10 and so on.

Interesting question. I've never seen or heard any of you guys in there. I have booked on the quarter hour before without issue, so it can't be that they're using a rigid schedule. How do they do it? Magic is the only thing that makes sense to me.

[Marblism]

I was stood up by an early Seeking date and was thinking of options. About 9:10 AM I thought I'd check out Good-Heaven for the first time. Response time was decent, but not fast. By the time I got an OK for a 10:00 AM appointment and an address, it was already almost 9:45. I told the scheduler I couldn't make it there in my schedule time.

The scheduler told me to never contact them again!

WTF?

I had an 11:00 schedule and asked if 10:30 was possible and they told me to cancel and find somewhere else to go. I said, I was not cancelling just asking if earlier was available and they said all slots taken see you at 11.

[AvgJoeNJane]

Visited Pink (Yumi) at GH today. The picture of her in black https://good-heaven.com/pink/ is spot on. She's 22 years old with a very muscular ass and super strong legs. She almost crushed my skull between her legs during DATY. Did / does pole exercise, lower body is strong and for those of us who like a muscular ass, she has got it. In heels is something to see. A little pouch that she seems to be very self conscience of, but nothing bad. Very sweet and super fun personality. Nice full lips and hard thick nipples on her small breast.

Not her fault at all, paid for two pops and managed zero. She had me going good, but a little heavy on the lube on top of getting maybe an hour of sleep last night, did not let me bring my A game. (or B for that matter).

She's fun and playful and worth a visit if you like strong lower body and nice firm round ass. Says only here a week.

Caught a glimpse of who I think is Jisoo messing with the thermostat. She looks terrific wrapped in a towel.

She's cute but definitely need to add 8-10 yrs from their pictures. Also I'm not sure if it's considered a little pouch, more of a hangbag. Still had a great time though.

[JohnGuest]

I was stood up by an early Seeking date and was thinking of options. About 9:10 AM I thought I'd check out Good-Heaven for the first time. Response time was decent, but not fast. By the time I got an OK for a 10:00 AM appointment and an address, it was already almost 9:45. I told the scheduler I couldn't make it there in my schedule time.

The scheduler told me to never contact them again!

WTF?

[Amingo]

I thought it was known the images were just representative of what the girls look like. At least when they have established profiles, the linked reviews indicate if images are the actual girl or a likeness. I think the problem would be if they do not accurately depict the girl in question. THAT would be a problem. Anyway, I guess I just assumed the pictures wouldn't often be of the actual girl.

I can see how some may be surprised by that and understand how some may see it as an issue.

I would say the photos are from at least 10 years ago. Usually I add 10 on age list on GH site.

[XandirHunt]

New lineup at GH with Jisoo and Pink. We expect some photoshopping with KGirls. GH posting misleading, fake pictures is going to damage their reputation. Does GH know we can reverse search their model images and check to see if they are AI generated?

I thought it was known the images were just representative of what the girls look like. At least when they have established profiles, the linked reviews indicate if images are the actual girl or a likeness. I think the problem would be if they do not accurately depict the girl in question. THAT would be a problem. Anyway, I guess I just assumed the pictures wouldn't often be of the actual girl.

I can see how some may be surprised by that and understand how some may see it as an issue.

[Marblism]

Visited Pink (Yumi) at GH today. The picture of her in black https://good-heaven.com/pink/ is spot on. She's 22 years old with a very muscular ass and super strong legs. She almost crushed my skull between her legs during DATY. Did / does pole exercise, lower body is strong and for those of us who like a muscular ass, she has got it. In heels is something to see. A little pouch that she seems to be very self conscience of, but nothing bad. Very sweet and super fun personality. Nice full lips and hard thick nipples on her small breast.

Not her fault at all, paid for two pops and managed zero. She had me going good, but a little heavy on the lube on top of getting maybe an hour of sleep last night, did not let me bring my A game. (or B for that matter).

She's fun and playful and worth a visit if you like strong lower body and nice firm round ass. Says only here a week.

Caught a glimpse of who I think is Jisoo messing with the thermostat. She looks terrific wrapped in a towel.

[Marblism]

Curious if anyone knows the actual answer to this random question. If a place opens lets say 9:00 and has two or three girls by appointment only. I'm guessing appointments are staggered to not run into each other, but I am not sure. Ie: one girl at 9:00 second at 9:30 and third maybe 10:00. Or are the girls actually back to back. First guy at 9 second at 10 and so on.

[WanderingAbout]

New lineup at GH with Jisoo and Pink. We expect some photoshopping with KGirls. GH posting misleading, fake pictures is going to damage their reputation. Does GH know we can reverse search their model images and check to see if they are AI generated?

For what it's worth. A ChatGPT and Gemini analysis of the five pictures of Yua posted by GH was conducted to determine authenticity.

Image 1 (Purple Background / Bikini): Likely Real Photograph. Exhibits natural skin textures, realistic hair strands, authentic lighting, and commercial watermarking that point to genuine photography.

Images 25 (Vanity, City Skyline, Pink Dress, Pink Closet): Likely AI-Generated. Facial Consistency: feature an identical facial structure across drastically different environments, a signature trait of AI character consistency models. Visual Clues: Hyper-smooth airbrushed"l skin, unnaturally perfect lighting, subtle background reflection errors (notably in Image 4), and overly glossy, synthetic material textures.

Image 1: 90% confidence it is a real photograph. Image 2: 90% confidence it is AI generated. Image 3: 95% confidence it is AI generated. Image 4: 98% confidence it is AI generated. Image 5: 98% confidence it is AI generated.

[Marblism]

For what it's worth. A ChatGPT and Gemini analysis of the five pictures of Yua posted by GH was conducted to determine authenticity.

Image 1 (Purple Background / Bikini): Likely Real Photograph. Exhibits natural skin textures, realistic hair strands, authentic lighting, and commercial watermarking that point to genuine photography.

Images 25 (Vanity, City Skyline, Pink Dress, Pink Closet): Likely AI-Generated. Facial Consistency: feature an identical facial structure across drastically different environments, a signature trait of AI character consistency models. Visual Clues: Hyper-smooth airbrushed"l skin, unnaturally perfect lighting, subtle background reflection errors (notably in Image 4), and overly glossy, synthetic material textures.

Image 1: 90% confidence it is a real photograph. Image 2: 90% confidence it is AI generated. Image 3: 95% confidence it is AI generated. Image 4: 98% confidence it is AI generated. Image 5: 98% confidence it is AI generated.

With the sherlock holmes analysis seems like they took the real picture and then made duplicates with different scenes. Cost affective and given the first one seems legit, that's probably what she looks like. I know the ones who post completely misleading pics and a surprise when the door opens.

[JcMorpheus]

Sora has the special rate so I went ahead and met with her. She's a nice MILF with a nice attitude, makes sure you are pleased. took it well and seemed to enjoy her self. She was eager for round two. left drained and satisfied.

[WanderingAbout]

For what it's worth. A ChatGPT and Gemini analysis of the five pictures of Yua posted by GH was conducted to determine authenticity.

Image 1 (Purple Background / Bikini): Likely Real Photograph. Exhibits natural skin textures, realistic hair strands, authentic lighting, and commercial watermarking that point to genuine photography.

Images 2–5 (Vanity, City Skyline, Pink Dress, Pink Closet): Likely AI-Generated. Facial Consistency: feature an identical facial structure across drastically different environments, a signature trait of AI character consistency models. Visual Clues: Hyper-smooth airbrushed"l skin, unnaturally perfect lighting, subtle background reflection errors (notably in Image 4), and overly glossy, synthetic material textures.

Image 1: 90% confidence it is a real photograph. Image 2: 90% confidence it is AI generated. Image 3: 95% confidence it is AI generated. Image 4: 98% confidence it is AI generated. Image 5: 98% confidence it is AI generated.