Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls in OC
+
Add Report
Results 91 to 105 of 3616
-
07-18-26 01:56 #3526Senior Member

Posts: 99Just the way I see it, IMO
Price drops should come from the Bosses or Bookers, the girls at the incall do all the work / heavy lifting!
Originally Posted by SoloAdventure
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-26 18:32 #3525Senior Member

Posts: 113I agree
Yea, everyone has their preferences but to point that out. From my perspective, she was light skin to me. I think that goes the same with those who said J Saki was tan. Both light skin and beautiful, along with their great body, youth, personality and service. What's their to complain.
Originally Posted by SoloAdventure
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-26 17:30 #3524Senior Member

Posts: 113+1 Agree Runa = Young CYA
I agree with Jack. She was on the east coast with good reviews too.
Originally Posted by JackShackHuntr
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-26 16:13 #3523Senior Member

Posts: 98He said what?
My man said "Jungle" Asians lmfao. That's hilarious. Dont think I've seen a tan/darker skinned girls from my experience with the Korgs, they all seemed be pretty fair skinned. For me its mainly the attitude, I can power through some fugly hoes. But not ones with shitty attitudes.
Originally Posted by Goku17
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-26 15:43 #3522Senior Member

Posts: 115Gatesmashers OC Edition
New J-girl Baby Runa landed in OC. I say run to see B. Runa! Full PLEASER coming soon but here's the gist of it:
Young, CYA+ GND, early twenties (20-23). Claims 21; booker says real age 21. Believable. Incredible physique—very lean with subtle ab definition, especially in missionary with legs back. Skinny to Skinny+ build, enough ass to give two handfuls, natural A to small B cups. HYA+ Service, a lot of eye contact during BBBJ. LFK over DFK.
Baby Runa = Baby Airi / Miyu, not the same person but equivalent in performance and looks.
Baby Runa
https://gangnamsecrets.com/profile/jp-baby-runa
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-runa
https://kbeautygirls.com/baby-runa
https://get9irl.com/RunaJ
-
07-17-26 14:14 #3521Senior Member

Posts: 2722Yes, it's a lot of things that is nobody's fault. People want to cut back, focus on world cup, or just enjoy a summer break. More important there are too many girls in every city and every country. It is even slower in Japan and most of Asia.
Originally Posted by SoloAdventure
[View Original Post]
320-370 HR is about what I'd expect to pay if I like a girl and have a good time. I can understand upcharge if she's hot, but I'll also pick a 50 upcharge girl over a 100 if there's an equal choice.
400 is a Longshot Option
What happens when a girl is 400 and up, is I'll only see her 3 ways: 1) She is S-Tier or some high combo of Looks and Service like A Looks A Service. 2) My main girl cancels and she's the best backup 3) I've seen all the better and cheaper girls, so I'm curious and I already know I'll see her just one time.
For 95% of girls, their only hope is #2 and #3 which is a stretch. I'll pick a "good for backup" girl one every 25 visits it feels like. And those girls outnumber ATFs, so they are splitting that tiny exception very thin. Most of the time a girl cancels, my backup is another ATF! It is by pure luck if my other ATFs are busy or I've repeated them so much I need a break. Then I see the 400 girl and I have fun but I can't repeat or tell my friends to see her.
"good for backup" + expensive is a dead end combo. There are other guys who "just want new" who are okay with backup level girls. But many of them will skip over higher priced girls too. That sums it up.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
I've never said a girl can't charge 400 or more. I'm just saying it is going to be very hard unless she is very hot or young. Contrasting 320 hr versus 400 hr leads to an OR rec (> 50% appeal) becoming an AND rec (<10% appeal):
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
Ms Angel is 320 hr and is for anyone who wants a young girl with a beautiful face OR a natural civvie girl who has a nice personality OR someone who likes a slightly thick body like the photo guide OR someone who wants a cute GFE only girl and doesn't want to pay a lot. If she went to 400 HR, you would see an AND description instead of OR in my matchmaking rec.
Originally Posted by Download X
[View Original Post]
I could say Lizza was for Spinner Hunters OR HYA Hunters OR guys who are into a DTF, submissive, cute young girl. This would make Lizza > 50% appeal (i.e. a randomly selected person could see her and probably like her). She has broad appeal and is popular. Full Service Hunters didn't like her, and in fact in 2024 many reviewers didn't like her. Only HYA Hunters did. I didn't even know the other perspective until the contrast in reviews showed up. Warning the right guys and inviting other guys naturally happens if you describe a girl well. It means the guys who show up after warnings tend to be a good match and have a higher success rate. People save money and the people who show up tend to repeat.
Lizza was an outlier at > 50% appeal. There are girls with < 10% appeal. Those girls' best bet is to price lower in the 300s range. Their best strat is for some guys to like and repeat them long-term.
-
07-17-26 11:39 #3520Senior Member

Posts: 289That's fair. Moving on.
Originally Posted by Goku17
[View Original Post]
A lot of the 4. 4/4. 5 have told me it's slow. I tell them economy is not so good but what I really want to say is they need to drop their pricing. I'm too chicken shit to tell them. Who wants to be the man. LOL.
-
07-17-26 11:04 #3519Senior Member

Posts: 340Well, we only see the girl for an hour, so if a girl is dark naturally or dark from a sun tan, she is dark skinned during our booking and that is what matters.
Originally Posted by SoloAdventure
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-26 03:16 #3518Senior Member

Posts: 289I'm all for accurate description. My peeve are natural tits that are clearly MM. Calling her dark when she has a dark tone is fine. But calling her dark when she's got a tanned from a day at the pool. A tan that you can clearly tell is temporary because you can see her white bikini lines. Isn't calling her dark against what you want? An accurate description? How are you all missing that point just for the sake of debating. LOL.
Originally Posted by ResilientJohn
[View Original Post]
-
07-17-26 02:14 #3517Senior Member

Posts: 99Yeah, I agree about descriptions,
But no need for anyone to be mean about it, like calling her a jungle Asian!
Originally Posted by ResilientJohn
[View Original Post]
I've also run across guys using Jap in a description, don't know if they are racist or just abbreviating.
-
07-17-26 01:50 #3516Senior Member

Posts: 751As long as it's physical attributes / features, I think calling it out is fair game and legitimate. All of us has differing preferences. Big / Small tits, Bush or no, light skin or dark skin, and a plethora of other traits that I'm not going to bother listing. I appreciate the fact that some people here include stuff like that.
Originally Posted by SoloAdventure
[View Original Post]
And no, most of us aren't lookers (probably) but we're shelling out money for lookers so info regarding how the girl looks in all aspects should be disclosed if OP is willing to share it. That distinction is important regardless of how crass, shallow, and superficial it sounds.
-
07-17-26 01:26 #3515Senior Member

Posts: 289Okay if you don't like a certain skin tone. Jungle asians? Come on man. You shouldn't be using that term for SEA.
Originally Posted by Goku17
[View Original Post]
It's all of Asia that doesn't want a dark skin tone. It has nothing to do with looking SEA. It's a culture value rooted from history where if you were dark, it meant you were uneducated, worked in the sun, probably a farmer, in other words, poor.
-
07-16-26 22:15 #3514Senior Member

Posts: 340I understand OP point of view though, in alot of the white skin asian countries being dark skin is considered unattractive because they will look like the jungle asians. I personally don't like dark skin or tan asians myself. So his comment was helpful for me.
Originally Posted by SoloAdventure
[View Original Post]
-
07-16-26 20:37 #3513Senior Member

Posts: 289Super fair. I picked Sansa because she had the perkiest. Rayne is wider and firm and Danbi is bigger because she's the bigger one of the three. It's really a toss up in that category. Then there's Karla. LOL.
Originally Posted by LemonPepper
[View Original Post]
-
07-16-26 20:34 #3512Senior Member

Posts: 289She enjoyed a day at the pool for the 4th holiday. We see each other doing the walk of shame, we're no lookers despite them telling us we're handsome or we look like a prince. Give the girl a break. There's other legitimate stuff to critic her but not a tan from a day in the sun. LOL.
Originally Posted by BookerN
[View Original Post]









Reply With Quote





