Korean Agency PSE / BBFS

**Gesab69** · 06-21-26 16:37

Can't believe people here are defending these rude bookers or obvious fake pics provided by the providers and then used by the bookers.

That being said, if you want to avoid dumping money in this hobby, you need to sharpen your research skills. In general, if a review does not explicitly state something, you should assume that it may not exist. That, for example, if you read reviews on TER or here, and none of them mention the provider being in her 20's or being fit, despite the agency claiming so on their website, there's a chance that the provider is older or not as fit as represented.

You also have to understand that most customers care about price, performance, and looks in that order with an exponentially larger degree to tolerate negatives between each preference. This means that if a provider performed well, but was clearly 20 years old and 20 pounds heavier than her pics, many customers will not even mention it because as long as they had a good time, they're willing to forgive. This also means that if someone does call out age or looks, but then ten reviews go by without anyone mentioning it, you should probably assume that that one review is right, and that the next ten just didn't care.

**Ngjx415** · 06-21-26 14:54

Originally Posted by KingsAndQueens [View Original Post]

Anyone else you all can recommend? Could either be a service queen like her or a HYA that does somewhat good service. I'm into MM boobs and a BBL if they have it 😎. Also dfk is kind of a must to get things going.

LEV and Jay at LTLV are service queens. Jay is older (probably around Pepsi age). Lev is mid to late 30's but she's wild. Her DFK will suck your entire face into her mouth. Both seems to be local staples and always available.

**NobodyZ** · 06-21-26 01:09

Pics rarely accurate, sometimes representative / have to do your homework on sites like this and elsewhere and occasionally TOFTT to manage expectations vs reality. This is the game.

Originally Posted by CSnow [View Original Post]

100% my point. I have zero expectations that pictures are unedited. But they should be close enough to not leave a client disappointed.

However, considering that you literally put your life into the hands of the shop you are going to, thuggish aggressive behavior should never be tolerated or accepted IMHO. That disturbed me more than completely fake pictures. This particular outfit does not sound safe for the patrons or women working there based on the aggression level of the scheduler IMHO.

Again, I posted verbatim messages so people can draw their own conclusions. No disrespect meant to anyone, I am just sharing my experience and my opinion.

**Mr Jumbo** · 06-21-26 00:32

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted because the subject of the report was in direct violation of a posted Admin Restriction on the author, the thread, and/or the subject. This behavior will not be tolerated, and a 2nd violation will result in an automatic banning.

**KingsAndQueens** · 06-20-26 22:26

Anyone else you all can recommend? Could either be a service queen like her or a HYA that does somewhat good service. I'm into MM boobs and a BBL if they have it 😎. Also dfk is kind of a must to get things going.

**CSnow-shill** · 06-20-26 19:43

Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]

Nothing wrong with telling a booker the chick looks nothing like her pics and you weren't happy. Nothing wrong with expecting a girl to at least be in the same appearance "universe" as her picture. They are, after all, meant to be representative of what you're going to get.

If someone shows up and the chick is missing all her teeth, fat, smelly and overweight. The customer is supposed to simply accept that?

Imo, he's not in the wrong.

100% my point. I have zero expectations that pictures are unedited. But they should be close enough to not leave a client disappointed.

However, considering that you literally put your life into the hands of the shop you are going to, thuggish aggressive behavior should never be tolerated or accepted IMHO. That disturbed me more than completely fake pictures. This particular outfit does not sound safe for the patrons or women working there based on the aggression level of the scheduler IMHO.

Again, I posted verbatim messages so people can draw their own conclusions. No disrespect meant to anyone, I am just sharing my experience and my opinion.

**Gopher0254** · 06-20-26 19:41

Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]

Nothing wrong with telling a booker the chick looks nothing like her pics and you weren't happy. Nothing wrong with expecting a girl to at least be in the same appearance "universe" as her picture. They are, after all, meant to be representative of what you're going to get.

If someone shows up and the chick is missing all her teeth, fat, smelly and overweight. The customer is supposed to simply accept that?

Imo, he's not in the wrong.

Your first k-girl? There is probably 2 maybe 3 between LA, LV, OC, SD that look like their pictures. Good luck out there. If a girl is that bad, complain to the booker and she won't be there long. That's just hyperbole and doesn't make your case. All the years I've been doing k-girls a few years now. Never saw that, pretty confident never will.

It's been explained here and other places dozens of times why and it's just a normal thing. If you're upset the girl you jerked off to online doesn't match real life. Find a SW so you know what they look like first.

**CSnow-shill** · 06-20-26 19:33

Originally Posted by Nikalo [View Original Post]

If you're expecting the girls to look like their photos, you need to completely reset your strategy. You'll be constantly disappointed.

If you threaten the booker to cancel an appointment because the girl does not look like their photos, like you foolishly did with your text messages, you're going to be blackballed by every booker.

You are in the wrong here.

100% disagree with you. If that's your experience, you are doing it wrong. Most of the time I deal. With C-girl shops and pictures are good representations of the women I see, even though they are edited a lot of the time, but very slightly. Any shop that cusses me out will never have a penny of my business. But you do you. That's why I posted exact messages, so every forum member can make an informed decision. Cheers.

**RogerOver** · 06-20-26 18:16

Originally Posted by Nikalo [View Original Post]

If you're expecting the girls to look like their photos, you need to completely reset your strategy. You'll be constantly disappointed.

If you threaten the booker to cancel an appointment because the girl does not look like their photos, like you foolishly did with your text messages, you're going to be blackballed by every booker.

You are in the wrong here.

Nothing wrong with telling a booker the chick looks nothing like her pics and you weren't happy. Nothing wrong with expecting a girl to at least be in the same appearance "universe" as her picture. They are, after all, meant to be representative of what you're going to get.

If someone shows up and the chick is missing all her teeth, fat, smelly and overweight. The customer is supposed to simply accept that?

Imo, he's not in the wrong.

**Nikalo** · 06-20-26 17:37

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**RogerOver** · 06-20-26 15:45

Originally Posted by CSnow [View Original Post]

FWIW this never happened to me before either. VAC scheduler appears to be fairly psychotic. Last time I didn't have a problem with him because I bit my tongue and went through with an appointment despite clearly fake pictures that weren't anywhwre close to reality.

This time I did ask him about it before the appointment, and he blew his gasket.

I also tried with LTLV and while it didn't work out, they were perfectly polite.

I am reattaching the messages with phone number removed per admin request (it's a public number they list on their contact page, not private).

Originally Posted by CalJammer [View Original Post]

"Get lost fucker" Very rude. I guess he is a guy who leases out women's buttholes so he's not going to be very graceful.

That is pretty fucking rude. Your question isn't out of line at all. Guess he doesn't need the business. Fuck him. You're very polite. I'd have been a bit ruder to him once I decided to cancel.

**CalJammer** · 06-20-26 15:03

Originally Posted by CSnow [View Original Post]

FWIW this never happened to me before either. VAC scheduler appears to be fairly psychotic. Last time I didn't have a problem with him because I bit my tongue and went through with an appointment despite clearly fake pictures that weren't anywhwre close to reality.

This time I did ask him about it before the appointment, and he blew his gasket.

I also tried with LTLV and while it didn't work out, they were perfectly polite.

I am reattaching the messages with phone number removed per admin request (it's a public number they list on their contact page, not private).

"Get lost fucker" Very rude. I guess he is a guy who leases out women's buttholes so he's not going to be very graceful.

**Charm 22** · 06-20-26 14:46

Originally Posted by Xrtopaz420 [View Original Post]

Checked the line up and saw Silky offered Greek, so I booked outcast, as I just preferred to stay at hotel. Arranged late time after quick verification. Met Silky in lobby tall thin In a black dress long hair. Went to room grabbed a empty elevator where as soon as door closed, once in room settled fees. Opted for covered Msog, and Greek. She went to bathroom got ready then we did a quick shower minimal play as she did not want hair wet. She had a carefree vibe. Was easy to be with. After shower bed and start sloppy BJ with DT and loved on the boys to 69,. Then she hopped on for CG, then to doggy Greek, started slow then was able to pound away till cia. Took and other quick shower the. Back to the bed for round 2, BJ, 69 CG, Miss, doggy then done and she was on her way.

Thanks for the report.

Is Greek included in the normal price? Does she look her age / like her pictures on the website?

Definitely interested in meeting her if you recommend her.

**Xrtopaz420** · 06-20-26 02:18

Checked the line up and saw Silky offered Greek, so I booked outcast, as I just preferred to stay at hotel. Arranged late time after quick verification. Met Silky in lobby tall thin In a black dress long hair. Went to room grabbed a empty elevator where as soon as door closed, once in room settled fees. Opted for covered Msog, and Greek. She went to bathroom got ready then we did a quick shower minimal play as she did not want hair wet. She had a carefree vibe. Was easy to be with. After shower bed and start sloppy BJ with DT and loved on the boys to 69,. Then she hopped on for CG, then to doggy Greek, started slow then was able to pound away till cia. Took and other quick shower the. Back to the bed for round 2, BJ, 69 CG, Miss, doggy then done and she was on her way.

**CSnow-shill** · 06-20-26 01:20

Originally Posted by RogerOver [View Original Post]

I see posts like these here and other boards. It's completely outside of any experience I've had with the booker. No problems at all. Wonder what it is that sets them off? Is there more than one booker over there?

FWIW this never happened to me before either. VAC scheduler appears to be fairly psychotic. Last time I didn't have a problem with him because I bit my tongue and went through with an appointment despite clearly fake pictures that weren't anywhwre close to reality.

This time I did ask him about it before the appointment, and he blew his gasket.

I also tried with LTLV and while it didn't work out, they were perfectly polite.

I am reattaching the messages with phone number removed per admin request (it's a public number they list on their contact page, not private).