Sugar Daddy Sites

[KayBez]

Does anyone know if when it shows a girl is online, is that live? I feel as like it's delayed or some of these girls just don't know how to reply in a timely manner.

[Lexx1]

TLDR: Would repeat if she shows up. 7. 5 for an overnight. Was late about 5 hours .Covered FS, no L1 or L2. Dead fish.

All that to me is a no win, a loss and a definite no repeat. Man for that amount it should have been bare everything and as pure a GFE experience as possible. She was probably late because she was fucking another scheduled daddy before you. Your little head definitely did the major thinking here. 250 to 450 ppms have got me as cute or better girls and alot more fun in bed with video too.

[Grail47]

WTF are L1 and L2? Do you think you are avoiding LE by using codes like that?

If you didn't get GFE from her, no matter who / what she is, you got played. The sugar world ought not to work like that.

I have seen that girl on the site before, I don't think she is actually in LA, I think she used to give her location in OC. So that may be why she was so late. You should always consider this. Girls list locations that are where they think guys are, or where they want to go, not where they are. Long ago, I messaged someone who listed Newport Beach, but she actually lived in Temecula.

Yeah, L1 and L2 are terms associated with AMP visits, not for SB's or independent escorts. I mean, L1 is a HJ and if that's what you wanted, you can visit most any AMP in town! But also, 7. 5 for an overnight and not even GFE level is kind of surprising.

[FarFarAway]

TLDR: Would repeat if she shows up.

Visiting and decided to message a couple people, ended up committing to Aria. 7. 5 for an overnight. Was late about 5 hours however within that time couldn't secure someone else due to the crap LA traffic. She ended up coming through late. Very petite and youthful. Without makeup made her look even more young. Extremely talkative.

Covered FS, no L1 or L2. Dead fish. However body and attraction made up for it. Despite saying she's picky about who she meets she had tons of stories to tell LOL. For LA the price was perfect as some others were asking that just to have appetizers.

WTF are L1 and L2? Do you think you are avoiding LE by using codes like that?

If you didn't get GFE from her, no matter who / what she is, you got played. The sugar world ought not to work like that.

I have seen that girl on the site before, I don't think she is actually in LA, I think she used to give her location in OC. So that may be why she was so late. You should always consider this. Girls list locations that are where they think guys are, or where they want to go, not where they are. Long ago, I messaged someone who listed Newport Beach, but she actually lived in Temecula.

[Ogshyguy]

TLDR: Would repeat if she shows up.

Visiting and decided to message a couple people, ended up committing to Aria. 7. 5 for an overnight. Was late about 5 hours however within that time couldn't secure someone else due to the crap LA traffic. She ended up coming through late. Very petite and youthful. Without makeup made her look even more young. Extremely talkative.

Covered FS, no L1 or L2. Dead fish. However body and attraction made up for it. Despite saying she's picky about who she meets she had tons of stories to tell LOL. For LA the price was perfect as some others were asking that just to have appetizers.

[Grail47]

I used Feeld, it's pretty much like any other dating app. To get the most of it, you got to pay. Like most apps you're going to be a million fish in a big pond. Lots of the same providers that post online already you can catch there. Most success I've had with it is in Vegas with other women, couples that are traveling and looking for fun. That's my 2 cents.

I've been on Feeld for over three years and joined because I am ENM / poly and in an open relationship. I spend time within the the ENM / poly community here in SoCal and Feeld is a great place to meet other people who are already ENM. Feeld isn't quite like Fetlife since there aren't events posted, but if you're looking for non-traditional relationships, kink or BDSM partners, meeting up with couples, then it's a decent app for this.

[AppleBottomFdr]

Yeah, it's ambiguous, but I wonder if it's meant to mean focused solely on them, like the SD will intentionally focused on only their needs, in an exclusive manner. I sometimes see this term on the profiles where the SB is asking for all her needs to be met, to get everything she wants.

Side note. Is anyone else recently experiencing more ghosting in the SB arena? Connections will be made and messaging started on the site, perhaps even entering some arrangement discussion and then the replies just stop. I think I have six SB's in my chat list who either matched with me or responded to my initial message and they all just stopped replying after a day or two. Such a bummer!

The use of the word intentional, I believe, started on civvie dating apps. It started as a way for women to communicate they are serious about a relationship, and they usually have a list of non-negotiables. It was a way to attempt to filter out men just looking for hookups, and to preempt wasting time and ghosting. You don't fit their requirements, move on. (Of course this assumes that the men will actually read their profile, when swiping decisions are made on photos alone). So the SBs may be using a template for dating apps, or it may be copied from their own civvie profile. But it's so common now, many SBs may not even know what it means and just use it bc every chick is using it.

[ChefSolo]

I read about this app today in the LA Times. It is for those 'exploring' their sexuality. Seems sorta like fetlife. It is only a phone app, not a website, so far as I can tell. I could imagine 'age gap' relationships would fit into an 'adventure'.

Anyone have knowledge / experience?

I used Feeld, it's pretty much like any other dating app. To get the most of it, you got to pay. Like most apps you're going to be a million fish in a big pond. Lots of the same providers that post online already you can catch there. Most success I've had with it is in Vegas with other women, couples that are traveling and looking for fun. That's my 2 cents.

[FarFarAway]

I read about this app today in the LA Times. It is for those 'exploring' their sexuality. Seems sorta like fetlife. It is only a phone app, not a website, so far as I can tell. I could imagine 'age gap' relationships would fit into an 'adventure'.

Anyone have knowledge / experience?

[RanManCan]

I agree. I'm out if I am ever required to verify to maintain my subscriptions. The price is potentially too high.

I have a Seeking profile that is 22 months old, but was never a paid account.

Will it require face verification if I convert it to paid?

[CuriousVaMan]

I agree. I'm out if I am ever required to verify to maintain my subscriptions. The price is potentially too high.

I cut and pasted that email, which I received a while back. I was suspended but not banned. I just had to go through the facade of watching their video about the ToS and 'community standards'.

It is good to know that 'policy' is out there though, and what you have to do to keep active on the seeking site. It is a royal pain to get back on if you get banned.

I hate that I have one black mark against that particular profile. Any little glitch in the future, a complaint from a girl, and I could lose it. Sometimes it is so easy to do something that you don't think is a problem, but it is. And you really want to hold on to grandfathered profiles. That profile, it has some old photos of someone who looks like me and is not selfie verified, which is of course required for new profiles these days. I'd never do that.

[FarFarAway]

I cut and pasted that email, which I received a while back. I was suspended but not banned. I just had to go through the facade of watching their video about the ToS and 'community standards'.

It is good to know that 'policy' is out there though, and what you have to do to keep active on the seeking site. It is a royal pain to get back on if you get banned.

I hate that I have one black mark against that particular profile. Any little glitch in the future, a complaint from a girl, and I could lose it. Sometimes it is so easy to do something that you don't think is a problem, but it is. And you really want to hold on to grandfathered profiles. That profile, it has some old photos of someone who looks like me and is not selfie verified, which is of course required for new profiles these days. I'd never do that.

[CuriousVaMan]

Banged an SB the other day who said a friend of hers set-up the Seeking account, no longer needed it and "gave" it to my SB. FFA, have you considered begging someone on this forum to "give" you a Seeking account they no longer use? I know I have 2 accounts in good standing. One I transact on, the other one used to see if I've been blocked. Maybe there's a generous soul willing to help you out.

Thank you for reaching out. Your account has been suspended due to a violation of our updated Community Guidelines, specifically regarding the prohibition of soliciting companionship in exchange for compensation. Seeking strictly prohibits any references to, or arrangements involving, compensated companionshipincluding dating, intimacy, or mentorship exchanged for money, gifts, or other benefits. Some examples of prohibited content include:

Mentions of "sugar dating" or related terms like "sugar daddy," "sugar mama," or "sugar baby. ".

References to "PPM" (pay-per-meet), "allowance," or any specific financial terms in relation to companionship.

Offers or requests involving paid dates, transactional intimacy, or financial arrangements.

Promotion of escorting, intimate massages, cuddling services, or similar compensated services.

Attempts to negotiate any compensation for personal interaction.

You can review our full Community Guidelines here: https://www.seeking.com/community-guidelines. We also encourage you to check out how we prohibit transactional dating here: https://www.seeking.com/dating-safely#transactional-dating-prohibited.

We understand these changes may require adjustments, and we encourage you to review and update any content associated with your profile or communications to remain compliant. If you believe this action was taken in error, please reply to this message with any relevant details and we will be happy to review your case further.

[Dog Rice]

Bro, what is your plan moving forward?? I tried to set up a brand new account and going through all of the "clean process" to separate my old account is just too cumbersome. Gave up. LOL.

Thank you for reaching out. Your account has been suspended due to a violation of our updated Community Guidelines, specifically regarding the prohibition of soliciting companionship in exchange for compensation. Seeking strictly prohibits any references to, or arrangements involving, compensated companionshipincluding dating, intimacy, or mentorship exchanged for money, gifts, or other benefits. Some examples of prohibited content include:

Mentions of "sugar dating" or related terms like "sugar daddy," "sugar mama," or "sugar baby. ".

References to "PPM" (pay-per-meet), "allowance," or any specific financial terms in relation to companionship.

Offers or requests involving paid dates, transactional intimacy, or financial arrangements.

Promotion of escorting, intimate massages, cuddling services, or similar compensated services.

Attempts to negotiate any compensation for personal interaction.

You can review our full Community Guidelines here: https://www.seeking.com/community-guidelines. We also encourage you to check out how we prohibit transactional dating here: https://www.seeking.com/dating-safely#transactional-dating-prohibited.

We understand these changes may require adjustments, and we encourage you to review and update any content associated with your profile or communications to remain compliant. If you believe this action was taken in error, please reply to this message with any relevant details and we will be happy to review your case further.

[Assaholic]

Or maybe they meant "serious", which is one of the synonyms for "intentional" according to OneLook?? Could be an artifact of a not-so-good translator.

Actually my own take on it is that they want something more long term.