NoVA SugarBabies

[Flipper69]

I actually had pretty decent experience with her for the donation amount. Her ask was 1 k but I think we settled at. 5 and went with BBFS and BBBJ. She's little bit chunkier IRL comparing to the photos but nothing too bad and it has a pretty face. Not the best conversationalist but let's face it, I'm not trying to wife her up here for what I wanted her for she was more than optimal. I might hit her up again but the only thing is it looks like she's been going around and doing it bare with bunch of guys so there is always that risk to keep in mind.

Ok, I guess YMMV. Did you know she's not 24 or 25 but rather pushing 29? Maturity wise yeah, probably close to 20. Someone shared a text here of her going off on someone for visiting this forum, calling him ugly and stuff and having to pay for sex in order to have it yet she's the one providing it. That ticked me off big time.

[Flipper69]

Rent is due.

Usual suspects all reaching out. Offering their wares for discounted prices. Emma, Rose, Molly, Violet, Angel, etc. , etc. , asking for a date. Need to keep the top SBs in my current rotation happy so will not be seeing any of the ladies with the tuna fish puss (though Rose has gone completely covered. Which is why is is now off the list).

Not going to bother to repost links here. Just check my profile and prior posts if you want their info. For those who don't want to travel. They are all in the DC / MD / VA region.

Thanks for the heads up. I might hit up Emma, if that's the same one I'm thinking about.

[ProCatHunter]

Rent is due.

Usual suspects all reaching out. Offering their wares for discounted prices. Emma, Rose, Molly, Violet, Angel, etc. , etc. , asking for a date. Need to keep the top SBs in my current rotation happy so will not be seeing any of the ladies with the tuna fish puss (though Rose has gone completely covered. Which is why is is now off the list).

Not going to bother to repost links here. Just check my profile and prior posts if you want their info. For those who don't want to travel. They are all in the DC / MD / VA region.

[Starwood1982]

Here are her photos I was making a reference to. She's little bit chunkier than the photos but still within my range.

[Starwood1982]

Gotcha. It was mostly DFF and there was not much effort on Celine's end. To be fair, that was a "busy" week for me and she was the third girl for me that week. The previous two were probably some of the best I've ever had. Went bare with both and they were phenomenal, multiple shots in both cases, and got one of them to go Greek, so the standards were set high. Imma drop their names and links on a separate post.

I actually had pretty decent experience with her for the donation amount. Her ask was 1 k but I think we settled at. 5 and went with BBFS and BBBJ. She's little bit chunkier IRL comparing to the photos but nothing too bad and it has a pretty face. Not the best conversationalist but let's face it, I'm not trying to wife her up here for what I wanted her for she was more than optimal. I might hit her up again but the only thing is it looks like she's been going around and doing it bare with bunch of guys so there is always that risk to keep in mind.

[AdcFellow]

I am curious if anyone has had any luck with this one (from both Seeking and WhatsYourPrice). I am chatting with her, but she has blocked me on both sites (likely so I cannot see how often she is online), so I cannot attach links so I have attached her pics. She goes by "Asia" on one site,. Cannot remember her name on the other.

[Senbonzakura]

Huh? I see them because I like them LOL.

I brought up they haven't been mentioned here to highlight my lack of success as most of the girls I've managed to see are the "easy" ones that plenty of guys here have already seen.

I gotcha. I thought you meant knowing they were "easy" made you not repeat.

[BazookaSteve]

Did you keep seeing the two regularly *because* they hadn't been mentioned before?

Huh? I see them because I like them LOL.

I brought up they haven't been mentioned here to highlight my lack of success as most of the girls I've managed to see are the "easy" ones that plenty of guys here have already seen.

[Flipper69]

Go to NYC. My success rate has been 0% in DC the past month because its a waste of energy to text / meet the beastess of DC.

I'm old and busted but I'm still mire attractive than beasts in DC. They should pay me.

I second this. This month has been awful and the quality of the girls around here is below average at best and it seems like it's going down. Some of them are delulu and think that they will be handed money and nice things just for being pretty (and most are that pretty either and they also lie about their age) andyhebonesbthatbare down to fuck, are just not that good at it at all. I know majority of them aren't pros but cmon, some of the performances I've experienced have been pathetic and embarrassing. Agree on NYC being way superior. Experienced that twice late last year and will be venturing out there in couple of weeks.

[Senbonzakura]

My response rate is very poor. Had a membership for one month, messaged about 200 girls and had like an 8% response rate. Majority moved to text, some didn't, saw about 6 girls from the ones that did move to text. 4/6 have already been mentioned here by other members, and the remaining 2 are the ones I continue to see regularly. I'm early 30's, and also have a very low effort profile with only one picture. I've had a couple girls ask for more pics and when I tried to get around it they stopped replying.

Also I agree with Tomford. While my profile is low effort, I think the DMV area is also partly to blame. The last time I was in NYC I messaged 10 girls, got 6 replies, and they were all hotter than majority of the girls in this area and I have a 75 mile radius set. I would need to message like 50 girls to get 6 responses here.

This leads me to a question for the larger group about consistency. When you guys meet new girls, do you go in with the intention of seeing them consistently if you have a good time or is your goal just to hook up and move on to the next one?

Did you keep seeing the two regularly *because* they hadn't been mentioned before?

For your second question: I go in intending to see them consistently. However if they are too pro-ish I get turned off and usually that's it (unless there's some type of novelty that draws me back a couple more times). There's some other criteria I look for too, but like I said in a previous post, I've only struck gold a couple times.

It's funny. If I put my business hat on and think for two seconds about how I would approach this game from the other side, watching the way some of these girls move boggles my mind. Who wants a flaky, dead fish in the sack who shows up late, can't fuck (or puts no effort into it), can't suck dick (or puts no effort into it), or has a multitude of "won't" to wade through? ESPECIALLY the ones who know this board exists. I'd want to be one of the ones nobody is willing to share because I'm that good, not one that's getting passed around or shit on because I'm crappy.

[Senbonzakura]

Could be.

From my experience they say they don't have money and are not consistant and can be real immature.

Me personally I think its more they not consistent.

I tend to see whites and Hispanics around mid to late 20's.

But who knows doubt we seeing same girls.

I just don't think its he is Asian.

BTW I'm no Chad so it ain't looks either and I'm 20 lbs over weight.

Interesting. I never thought of this before. Too small of an age gap being an issue.

[BazookaSteve]

So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.

Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?

I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.

My response rate is very poor. Had a membership for one month, messaged about 200 girls and had like an 8% response rate. Majority moved to text, some didn't, saw about 6 girls from the ones that did move to text. 4/6 have already been mentioned here by other members, and the remaining 2 are the ones I continue to see regularly. I'm early 30's, and also have a very low effort profile with only one picture. I've had a couple girls ask for more pics and when I tried to get around it they stopped replying.

Also I agree with Tomford. While my profile is low effort, I think the DMV area is also partly to blame. The last time I was in NYC I messaged 10 girls, got 6 replies, and they were all hotter than majority of the girls in this area and I have a 75 mile radius set. I would need to message like 50 girls to get 6 responses here.

Could be.

From my experience they say they don't have money and are not consistant and can be real immature.

Me personally I think its more they not consistent.

This leads me to a question for the larger group about consistency. When you guys meet new girls, do you go in with the intention of seeing them consistently if you have a good time or is your goal just to hook up and move on to the next one?

[Rkoppa]

He said mid-30's. You think he's too YOUNG?

Could be.

From my experience they say they don't have money and are not consistant and can be real immature.

Me personally I think its more they not consistent.

I tend to see whites and Hispanics around mid to late 20's.

But who knows doubt we seeing same girls.

I just don't think its he is Asian.

BTW I'm no Chad so it ain't looks either and I'm 20 lbs over weight.

[Senbonzakura]

I have had more success rate in terms of getting numbers and responses then you.

I'm South East Asian and 49.

Might be more your age then race.

No offense just giving you my experience.

Of course all this is subjective since might have different tastes in women and all.

Dam never thought about trying seeking when over seas.

He said mid-30's. You think he's too YOUNG?

[TomFordModel]

So what's everyone's success rate? I probably only message like 5% of the girls on the site and only 10% respond (I think a lot of them filter out mid-30's or Asian men). Maybe I get half of those to move off site. Then only half of those end up with a M&G. 90% of them are down to go to hotel room after the M&G and then we just meet weekly after that. I've never encountered a scammer or M&G ghoster luckily.

Quite happy with the ones I'm seeing now but after 6 months I do kinda want to try new ones but it's disappointing to get so few responses. But at least it's better than Tinder right?

I've also tried Seeking while traveling in Europe, Seoul, and Tokyo and it works better there. I get like 75% response rate, but I'm pretty selective in who I message in the first place. I also find the European girls are way more passionate and active in bed than the ones who grew up here, even though the ones that are early 20's.

Go to NYC. My success rate has been 0% in DC the past month because its a waste of energy to text / meet the beastess of DC.

I'm old and busted but I'm still mire attractive than beasts in DC. They should pay me.