Sugar Baby

[MolonLabe87]

Well said, everyone wants these great UTR SBs but complain about $150/ month and 3++ per meet. Too many on here try to use the SB sites like pro sites and ask for menus and hourly rates. You can def find that but youll just be dealing with pros who are charging double what they advertise on STG. The real value in the SB sites is you can find girls wiyh low miles and no time limits.

Edited because it sounded kind of preachy.

Anyways... People treating SA like listcrawler is what ruins the good time. Please gents, have some tact and skill with it.

[Voltron]

Well said, everyone wants these great UTR SBs but complain about $150/ month and 3++ per meet. Too many on here try to use the SB sites like pro sites and ask for menus and hourly rates. You can def find that but youll just be dealing with pros who are charging double what they advertise on STG. The real value in the SB sites is you can find girls wiyh low miles and no time limits.

You're 100% correct. Friday I hung out with a 27 year old bartender off seeking. Went to lunch and after two drinks I said you want to get out of here and get a hotel? She's new to the site and said she hadn't had sex in a while during lunch. So I struck while the iron was hot. Didn't discuss money but afterwards I gave her 300 as a "friend" and she was thankful. We spent an hour at lunch and more than two in the room, total GFE and BBFSCIP. Seeing her again at her place soon as she can host. There's gems on there.

[SpaEnjoyer57]

I tried Seeking but I don't like the intrusive sign-up policies (requires too much personal information) and the fact that the site states that they are against PPM. In my area of the country, the SB options were rather slim. I have had much better success rate with Secret Benefits where you pay as you need (for the first message to a SB), and with wider selection. Of course, as in any of these sites, you still need to weed off scammers and catfishes.

Thanks for the tip, I might need to try this myself, it is very tedious and tiring for me to filter out all the scammers and catfishes as you said.

[SpaEnjoyer57]

This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.

I also second this opinion. AMPs can also be a good route, especially if you stick to the big names and well reviewed spas, you are usually likely to get a good time for a reasonable price without breaking the wallet.

[TrentWilliams]

This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.

Well said, everyone wants these great UTR SBs but complain about $150/ month and 3++ per meet. Too many on here try to use the SB sites like pro sites and ask for menus and hourly rates. You can def find that but youll just be dealing with pros who are charging double what they advertise on STG. The real value in the SB sites is you can find girls wiyh low miles and no time limits.

[Dartagnan80]

This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.

I tried Seeking but I don't like the intrusive sign-up policies (requires too much personal information) and the fact that the site states that they are against PPM. In my area of the country, the SB options were rather slim. I have had much better success rate with Secret Benefits where you pay as you need (for the first message to a SB), and with wider selection. Of course, as in any of these sites, you still need to weed off scammers and catfishes.

[Don1990]

I had some success on and off with seeking. I felt it was way better back around 2017 through 2020. It does become a real challenge though for someone who's married since the majority of the ladies can't host. Although the price has gone up that didn't bother me to much when thinking about getting back on. However, it seems like now you have to have a good selfie and provide more information than I would like to get a profile approved. If there's an easier way to maneuver around this I'm all ears. I did give secret benefits a try and it was easy to set up a profile, much like seeking was back in the day but I felt this site was simply a tease to get you to buy more credits and waste them on secret photos the ladies post. Nonetheless for a married guy seeking, in my opinion, isn't as user friendly as it used to be.

Seeking has its benefits and cons I'm not married I don't host at my house I get a hotel room but its very easy for me to do that so I can fuck plenty of the girls on seeking I don't need a pic at all never put one on the site and only send one when we move to texting but it never stop me.

[Midnightpass]

No, it's just you.

I've been on Seeking for 9 years, and some of the best (and cheapest) sex I've gotten has been during the last 6 months.

I don't like that the monthly fee has nearly doubled from $80 to $150, but that's a separate issue.

I've noticed that most of your posts involve you getting scammed or ripped off. No offense, but that's on you. Tighten up your game and learn how to properly screen women. On average, for every 20 women I contact, I actually meet one. That 20:1 ratio is time-consuming, but that's how I weed out the scammers and bi-polar psychos. This hobby isn't for everyone.

This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.

[Hawkeye49]

No, it's just you.

I've been on Seeking for 9 years, and some of the best (and cheapest) sex I've gotten has been during the last 6 months.

I don't like that the monthly fee has nearly doubled from $80 to $150, but that's a separate issue.

I've noticed that most of your posts involve you getting scammed or ripped off. No offense, but that's on you. Tighten up your game and learn how to properly screen women. On average, for every 20 women I contact, I actually meet one. That 20:1 ratio is time-consuming, but that's how I weed out the scammers and bi-polar psychos. This hobby isn't for everyone.

I had some success on and off with seeking. I felt it was way better back around 2017 through 2020. It does become a real challenge though for someone who's married since the majority of the ladies can't host. Although the price has gone up that didn't bother me to much when thinking about getting back on. However, it seems like now you have to have a good selfie and provide more information than I would like to get a profile approved. If there's an easier way to maneuver around this I'm all ears. I did give secret benefits a try and it was easy to set up a profile, much like seeking was back in the day but I felt this site was simply a tease to get you to buy more credits and waste them on secret photos the ladies post. Nonetheless for a married guy seeking, in my opinion, isn't as user friendly as it used to be.

[Headhunter2000]

Seeking is a waste ground now. Nothing worth long term.

No, it's just you.

I've been on Seeking for 9 years, and some of the best (and cheapest) sex I've gotten has been during the last 6 months.

I don't like that the monthly fee has nearly doubled from $80 to $150, but that's a separate issue.

I've noticed that most of your posts involve you getting scammed or ripped off. No offense, but that's on you. Tighten up your game and learn how to properly screen women. On average, for every 20 women I contact, I actually meet one. That 20:1 ratio is time-consuming, but that's how I weed out the scammers and bi-polar psychos. This hobby isn't for everyone.

[TrentWilliams]

Won a small battle for us SBmongers last night. Sniffed out a cash and dash and left her boyfriend furious. I'll have to type out the story at some point because it might make a good read.

[MolonLabe87]

Mika.

Alt girl lives in Altamonte. No real rules but wants 600 PPM. Able to host. Unwilling to negotiate. Passed.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...c-a4c2869de3fc

Lovely.

Chubby latina. 350 minimum. CFS only but loves anal. Can't host. If she lost weight and allowed BBFS I'd consider repeating or dropped her price.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...b-15061338e9ec

Suzette.

MILF Latina. Recent work change makes her only available after 11 pm Monday through Thursday. Can host. Her availability didn't work for me so I didn't pursue further.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...7-79139b6981e0

I have a couple potentials that I'm trying out this week that I'll report back on later.

[TrentWilliams]

Not be married. I got divorced in 2014 due to a controlling woman that hated sex. Seeking, (when it works) is the greatest thing for a single guy.

Similar situation here. Best part is its def cheaper than being married!!

[MolonLabe87]

Nice, tight, petite little body.

Yeah, that is exactly what I was looking for. If I think about it, this is probably a bad time of year to be mongering. Any of these girls that have a day job are probably getting their tax refund checks and are busy blowing it. Probably around April or March they will be in need of cash again, which should cure some of the cases of GPS.

[ChrisMo44]

Seeking is a waste ground now. Nothing worth long term.