Find Your New Baby
Ferrant Lax Mexico City
Meet Sugar Babies
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
Top Escorts
High Class Companions

Thread: Sugar Baby

+ Add Report
Page 21 of 540 FirstFirst ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 71 121 521 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 315 of 8093
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #7793
    Quote Originally Posted by Rocker19  [View Original Post]
    I am rookie in this game. Question. I had a convo with a girl. I video verify her and met her in person afterwards for just an hi and hello. We agreed to meet on her place. We texted thru signal app.

    There is also a MILF fully dressed. Had a chat on signal as well. I video verify her, even sending her bra pics to. She ask me to confirm (to say yes) that we are meeting on this place, date, time and price. Even asking me if I am a a cop.

    What is your take on this. Deal or no deal? Thanks.
    Imo LE goes for low hanging fruit like streetwalkers and prostitution stings which are easy to convict. I don't think they're going through the hassle of creating a seeking account which is acting as a dating app and trying to catch people in an act that may or may not look like prostitution. Just my opinion.

  2. #7792

    Info??

    Has anyone tried this one, any info as to real? Age changes every so often??

    https://members.seeking.com/member/8...1-633003e007b9

  3. #7791

    Never be too careful

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocker19  [View Original Post]
    I am rookie in this game. Question. I had a convo with a girl. I video verify her and met her in person afterwards for just an hi and hello. We agreed to meet on her place. We texted thru signal app.

    There is also a MILF fully dressed. Had a chat on signal as well. I video verify her, even sending her bra pics to. She ask me to confirm (to say yes) that we are meeting on this place, date, time and price. Even asking me if I am a a cop.

    What is your take on this. Deal or no deal? Thanks.
    General, News, and Begative reports threads are a good spot to check names and numbers. Everyone here is an expert lawyer on the weekends, but for my 2 cents if they're sending you nudes and you've met them in person to confirm that's them in the photos, you're probably fine. Unless it was ai, or public photos grabbed off the internet and cropped etc. Everyone gets nervous and asks if you're a cop at some point.

  4. #7790

    Is She A LEO

    I am rookie in this game. Question. I had a convo with a girl. I video verify her and met her in person afterwards for just an hi and hello. We agreed to meet on her place. We texted thru signal app.

    There is also a MILF fully dressed. Had a chat on signal as well. I video verify her, even sending her bra pics to. She ask me to confirm (to say yes) that we are meeting on this place, date, time and price. Even asking me if I am a a cop.

    What is your take on this. Deal or no deal? Thanks.

  5. #7789
    Quote Originally Posted by TrentWilliams  [View Original Post]
    Well said, everyone wants these great UTR SBs but complain about $150/ month and 3++ per meet. Too many on here try to use the SB sites like pro sites and ask for menus and hourly rates. You can def find that but youll just be dealing with pros who are charging double what they advertise on STG. The real value in the SB sites is you can find girls wiyh low miles and no time limits.
    Edited because it sounded kind of preachy.

    Anyways... People treating SA like listcrawler is what ruins the good time. Please gents, have some tact and skill with it.

  6. #7788
    Quote Originally Posted by TrentWilliams  [View Original Post]
    Well said, everyone wants these great UTR SBs but complain about $150/ month and 3++ per meet. Too many on here try to use the SB sites like pro sites and ask for menus and hourly rates. You can def find that but youll just be dealing with pros who are charging double what they advertise on STG. The real value in the SB sites is you can find girls wiyh low miles and no time limits.
    You're 100% correct. Friday I hung out with a 27 year old bartender off seeking. Went to lunch and after two drinks I said you want to get out of here and get a hotel? She's new to the site and said she hadn't had sex in a while during lunch. So I struck while the iron was hot. Didn't discuss money but afterwards I gave her 300 as a "friend" and she was thankful. We spent an hour at lunch and more than two in the room, total GFE and BBFSCIP. Seeing her again at her place soon as she can host. There's gems on there.

  7. #7787
    Shill account ignore all posts


    Posts: 24

    Good suggestion

    Quote Originally Posted by Dartagnan80  [View Original Post]
    I tried Seeking but I don't like the intrusive sign-up policies (requires too much personal information) and the fact that the site states that they are against PPM. In my area of the country, the SB options were rather slim. I have had much better success rate with Secret Benefits where you pay as you need (for the first message to a SB), and with wider selection. Of course, as in any of these sites, you still need to weed off scammers and catfishes.
    Thanks for the tip, I might need to try this myself, it is very tedious and tiring for me to filter out all the scammers and catfishes as you said.

  8. #7786
    Shill account ignore all posts


    Posts: 24

    Agree

    Quote Originally Posted by Midnightpass  [View Original Post]
    This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.
    I also second this opinion. AMPs can also be a good route, especially if you stick to the big names and well reviewed spas, you are usually likely to get a good time for a reasonable price without breaking the wallet.

  9. #7785
    Quote Originally Posted by Midnightpass  [View Original Post]
    This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.
    Well said, everyone wants these great UTR SBs but complain about $150/ month and 3++ per meet. Too many on here try to use the SB sites like pro sites and ask for menus and hourly rates. You can def find that but youll just be dealing with pros who are charging double what they advertise on STG. The real value in the SB sites is you can find girls wiyh low miles and no time limits.

  10. #7784
    Quote Originally Posted by Midnightpass  [View Original Post]
    This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.
    I tried Seeking but I don't like the intrusive sign-up policies (requires too much personal information) and the fact that the site states that they are against PPM. In my area of the country, the SB options were rather slim. I have had much better success rate with Secret Benefits where you pay as you need (for the first message to a SB), and with wider selection. Of course, as in any of these sites, you still need to weed off scammers and catfishes.

  11. #7783

    I think its ok at best

    Quote Originally Posted by Hawkeye49  [View Original Post]
    I had some success on and off with seeking. I felt it was way better back around 2017 through 2020. It does become a real challenge though for someone who's married since the majority of the ladies can't host. Although the price has gone up that didn't bother me to much when thinking about getting back on. However, it seems like now you have to have a good selfie and provide more information than I would like to get a profile approved. If there's an easier way to maneuver around this I'm all ears. I did give secret benefits a try and it was easy to set up a profile, much like seeking was back in the day but I felt this site was simply a tease to get you to buy more credits and waste them on secret photos the ladies post. Nonetheless for a married guy seeking, in my opinion, isn't as user friendly as it used to be.
    Seeking has its benefits and cons I'm not married I don't host at my house I get a hotel room but its very easy for me to do that so I can fuck plenty of the girls on seeking I don't need a pic at all never put one on the site and only send one when we move to texting but it never stop me.

  12. #7782
    Quote Originally Posted by Headhunter2000  [View Original Post]
    No, it's just you.

    I've been on Seeking for 9 years, and some of the best (and cheapest) sex I've gotten has been during the last 6 months.

    I don't like that the monthly fee has nearly doubled from $80 to $150, but that's a separate issue.

    I've noticed that most of your posts involve you getting scammed or ripped off. No offense, but that's on you. Tighten up your game and learn how to properly screen women. On average, for every 20 women I contact, I actually meet one. That 20:1 ratio is time-consuming, but that's how I weed out the scammers and bi-polar psychos. This hobby isn't for everyone.
    This hobby, at your level of patience, isn't for everyone. At 3 providers a month, the $150.00 adds $50.00 to each session. If you can make this a value, good on ya, but I'm sticking to the AMPs.

  13. #7781

    Seeking

    Quote Originally Posted by Headhunter2000  [View Original Post]
    No, it's just you.

    I've been on Seeking for 9 years, and some of the best (and cheapest) sex I've gotten has been during the last 6 months.

    I don't like that the monthly fee has nearly doubled from $80 to $150, but that's a separate issue.

    I've noticed that most of your posts involve you getting scammed or ripped off. No offense, but that's on you. Tighten up your game and learn how to properly screen women. On average, for every 20 women I contact, I actually meet one. That 20:1 ratio is time-consuming, but that's how I weed out the scammers and bi-polar psychos. This hobby isn't for everyone.
    I had some success on and off with seeking. I felt it was way better back around 2017 through 2020. It does become a real challenge though for someone who's married since the majority of the ladies can't host. Although the price has gone up that didn't bother me to much when thinking about getting back on. However, it seems like now you have to have a good selfie and provide more information than I would like to get a profile approved. If there's an easier way to maneuver around this I'm all ears. I did give secret benefits a try and it was easy to set up a profile, much like seeking was back in the day but I felt this site was simply a tease to get you to buy more credits and waste them on secret photos the ladies post. Nonetheless for a married guy seeking, in my opinion, isn't as user friendly as it used to be.

  14. #7780
    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisMo44  [View Original Post]
    Seeking is a waste ground now. Nothing worth long term.
    No, it's just you.

    I've been on Seeking for 9 years, and some of the best (and cheapest) sex I've gotten has been during the last 6 months.

    I don't like that the monthly fee has nearly doubled from $80 to $150, but that's a separate issue.

    I've noticed that most of your posts involve you getting scammed or ripped off. No offense, but that's on you. Tighten up your game and learn how to properly screen women. On average, for every 20 women I contact, I actually meet one. That 20:1 ratio is time-consuming, but that's how I weed out the scammers and bi-polar psychos. This hobby isn't for everyone.

  15. #7779
    Won a small battle for us SBmongers last night. Sniffed out a cash and dash and left her boyfriend furious. I'll have to type out the story at some point because it might make a good read.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The hottest girls here
The hottest girls are here
WATCH PORN NOW
Top Tier Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape