Escort Reports

[StpaMonger]

Third time the charm? They are both fully aware I took this photo and consented to it being up.

[JahStoney]

I've found a girl I saw for years who swore up and down unprovoked that she only swallowed my cum. A random google search of her LC alter-ego resulted in an online video production with over 500 k views of her lips balls deep surrounding some dude's cock as he ejaculated down her throat for nearly 30 seconds. It wasn't me.

She still around? I've been looking for a girl with that particular skillset. Thanks in advance. Preciate it!

[RedRobinIdiot]

Did anybody try Sofia.

Here's her Eros ad.

https://www.eros.com/florida/tampa/files/6517021.htm

She posted as SB girl in the apps too.

[Tantra6969]

It is obvious that the more number of bare sticks that enter the hole, the higher the risk of diseases. IMHO it does depend on a lot of other factors. Does the provider present a clean picture of herself and her place? Does she have other habits? Does she take care of herself? Does she have a regular job outside of this line of work?

In my experience, I have seen girls who are ONLY doing this work and are usually seeing 4-5 clients a day at least. I never dare to risk anything bare with them. On the other hand, I have also seen providers who come across like a girl / woman next door. They have a regular job, go the gym and maintain a healthy look, do not partake in any drugs, dress nicely, talk intelligently and are in this business for either fun or some extra cash. Very rarely these women allow BBFS. But over a period of time, they may trust you more and relax on the rules. I have gone bare with a few of these but the fear lingers some where. My big head tells me not to risk at all but the small one some times takes over.

Curious to know those of you that roll the dice on presumably low volume ladies have gotten or know of someone that got an STD?

[BurnItDown]

It is obvious that the more number of bare sticks that enter the hole, the higher the risk of diseases. IMHO it does depend on a lot of other factors. Does the provider present a clean picture of herself and her place? Does she have other habits? Does she take care of herself? Does she have a regular job outside of this line of work?

In my experience, I have seen girls who are ONLY doing this work and are usually seeing 4-5 clients a day at least. I never dare to risk anything bare with them. On the other hand, I have also seen providers who come across like a girl / woman next door. They have a regular job, go the gym and maintain a healthy look, do not partake in any drugs, dress nicely, talk intelligently and are in this business for either fun or some extra cash. Very rarely these women allow BBFS. But over a period of time, they may trust you more and relax on the rules. I have gone bare with a few of these but the fear lingers some where. My big head tells me not to risk at all but the small one some times takes over.

Low volume could also mean only regulars and no new clients. The same ten people are easier to keep track of over ten randoms.

[FeedEmNutz]

200 for a QV is low? Bro don't feed the beasts like this.

I get roses are relative but come on man. 200 QV is ridiculous, especially for a first date where you have no idea what you are actually getting into. That's her incall rate by the way. Nuts.

[Smitty Qbert]

It is obvious that the more number of bare sticks that enter the hole, the higher the risk of diseases. IMHO it does depend on a lot of other factors. Does the provider present a clean picture of herself and her place? Does she have other habits? Does she take care of herself? Does she have a regular job outside of this line of work?

In my experience, I have seen girls who are ONLY doing this work and are usually seeing 4-5 clients a day at least. I never dare to risk anything bare with them. On the other hand, I have also seen providers who come across like a girl / woman next door. They have a regular job, go the gym and maintain a healthy look, do not partake in any drugs, dress nicely, talk intelligently and are in this business for either fun or some extra cash. Very rarely these women allow BBFS. But over a period of time, they may trust you more and relax on the rules. I have gone bare with a few of these but the fear lingers some where. My big head tells me not to risk at all but the small one some times takes over.

And that's the thing, you can't know, if the provider with higher clientele and higher risk, is actually carrying something or does the girl next door one, because she seems more put together, does.

If someone wants BB, more power to them. Feels better. I'm not taking the chance with either of them, because you don't know what a freak the GND was, or is, or in that one instance of relaxing the rules, gets something and doesn't realize it, while the grand canyon legs one gets frequent tests.

Too many times we've all know that GND one says no BB, but then will say "Oh, are you clean? Ok then, you can go bb".

[BubbaBlaze]

It is obvious that the more number of bare sticks that enter the hole, the higher the risk of diseases. IMHO it does depend on a lot of other factors. Does the provider present a clean picture of herself and her place? Does she have other habits? Does she take care of herself? Does she have a regular job outside of this line of work?

In my experience, I have seen girls who are ONLY doing this work and are usually seeing 4-5 clients a day at least. I never dare to risk anything bare with them. On the other hand, I have also seen providers who come across like a girl / woman next door. They have a regular job, go the gym and maintain a healthy look, do not partake in any drugs, dress nicely, talk intelligently and are in this business for either fun or some extra cash. Very rarely these women allow BBFS. But over a period of time, they may trust you more and relax on the rules. I have gone bare with a few of these but the fear lingers some where. My big head tells me not to risk at all but the small one some times takes over.

I like this topic. It's a fun conversation. And this is a general response to the topic, not directed to anyone, in particular.

If a girl is in a steady relationship and only fucks her man, is she Low Volume? Probably, since it is only one dick, even if he is pounding that pussy multiple times a day.

If a girl is a working girl and fucks 3 different guys a week, and I mean like in adding new dicks every week, and that's all the dick she is getting, is she low volume? Maybe.

On the one hand, you can determine if a girl is "low volume" based on an absolute standard of how many times she gets some dick in a day, week, month, etc. Or, it is a relative assessment based on the numerator (how many times she gets fucked) divided by the denominator (how many different guys put their dicks in her) in the same periodic (day, week, month, etc.) and determining an average. Everyone can set their own absolute or relative standard for "low volume".

Personally, I'm more focused on outcomes then the inputs. In other words, if a girl knocks my socks off, I don't really care if I'm the first one that day, week, month, etc. Or there have been too many to count before I stuck my dick in her mouth, pussy, or ass. I don't really think about where I am in the line up because these girls have to pay their rent, eat, and take care of their basic needs (usually buying drugs). I don't hold their need to survive against them, at all, unless they are shitty performers with a crappy attitude.

I don't think any of these girls would be considered "low volume" by any other girl who is not in the business. They simple get way more dick than most "regular" girls. And, most guys would think a "regular" girl is a total sl_ut if she was either getting laid multiple times a day or week or had more than 2 partners she saw regularly.

Let's all be honest, these are not "normal" girls, they're are working girls in the sex trade. It's their profession. Some are good at it. Some are average. Some are awful. I don't think we can be too judgey about "low volume" definitions.

Have fun, be safe, enjoy the hobby, and don't overthink about whether a girl is "low volume", "high volume", or "average". LOL.

[BurnItDown]

https://tryst.link/escort/leah-sinclair

Anyone ever used her? The low prices for QV & HH seem way too low.

200 for a QV is low? Bro don't feed the beasts like this.

[Moose813]

Has anyone seen her? https://tryst.link/escort/pornstar-jada-coxxx trying to cross off a few P-stars off my bucket list.

[FeedEmNutz]

I've found a girl I saw for years who swore up and down unprovoked that she only swallowed my cum. A random google search of her LC alter-ego resulted in an online video production with over 500 k views of her lips balls deep surrounding some dude's cock as he ejaculated down her throat for nearly 30 seconds. It wasn't me.

Posted the link on this site a few years back as soon as I found it and within 12 hours the guy's entire site was down. Inevitably a fellow board member made a notification and that was that. And to be clear the girl didn't mind being captured online. For some reason she felt some type of way about it being posted here. Anyway, I kick myself for doing it. I knew better based on some other experiences. If that guy is a board participant I owe him an apology. He had some great content and numerous familiar faces.

It would be helpful to have a secure site for vetted mongers only. Too much pillow talk and touchy feelies in an open forum. Django and some others ain't stop producing content. They stopped sharing it here.

[ImASlut069]

https://tryst.link/escort/leah-sinclair

Anyone ever used her? The low prices for QV & HH seem way too low.

Good lord, how could anyone complain that a $200 QV and $350 HHR are too low of a price?

[Smitty Qbert]

Not a bad practice for good hygiene, but also not an effective means of prevention.

Didn't say it was.

I'm just saying if the comment about a "low volume" is safer, then a low volume that doesn't do protection at all can't be safer than a high volume who does use protection.

[FeedEmNutz]

You do understand high volume ladies not only means the number of dicks, but bigger than that, the more likely you potentially get a disease. Certainly something to consider with high / low volume. Obviously, the lower the volume, the less likely you catch something.

Be safe out there!

Nice input.

Goes back to my original point regarding measuring "volume".

Wish I could set up a poll (I'll look into it).

VOLUME: I don't rationally see how low volume is even a consideration when rationale math suggests at the low end any regular provider is going to see a minimum of a triple digit number of different dicks in a given 365 day period. There will be different rules for different guys who play by different rules with different gals. There is additionally a likelihood she sees more of some than others which adds to any risk calculation.

SAFETY: Defined how? "Always" plays safe? Is the "always" or only for FS or are BBBJs allowed (you can't catch anything from a BJ right)? Is "always" for new clients, or are exceptions made for guys they "know"? Does she become better friends with new clients where new not talked about rules are established? Stealth? How honest are these gals? How many girls do you know that post this and provide you with that? Are you unique? I'll help you: No.

I've found a girl I saw for years who swore up and down unprovoked that she only swallowed my cum. A random google search of her LC alter-ego resulted in an online video production with over 500 k views of her lips balls deep surrounding some dude's cock as he ejaculated down her throat for nearly 30 seconds. It wasn't me.

Be real with yourself is all I'm saying. If a "safe" girl who averages half a dick a day makes you feel better than a high volume provider who averages 4, whatever makes you feel good.

Do we all feel better about some girls than others: yeah. Do provider posts and pillow talk mean anything substantive that you should be making health and welfare decisions on:

Hell No.

[Simms156]

So a high volume that only does covered play isn't safer than a low volume that allows bareback and CIP?

Either way, I will ask the girls to allow me to shower my privates, or to use a towel to clean up (with soap and water) immediately afterwards. Almost everyone hasn't had issue with it.

Not a bad practice for good hygiene, but also not an effective means of prevention.