Thread: Agency Discussion and Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 151 to 165 of 1402
-
01-21-26 14:23 #1252Senior Member

Posts: 39CCG Ellen (Elien)
Bond Girl, all the way. The epitome of elegance and near physical perfection. Definitely in my 3 ATF. I thought so the first time she visited, last April.
I actually got a haircut and dressed up, for this one. This is the level of provider that we want to consistently see here, like in LA or LV.
So, that's it for my bonus. I'm tapped out till next payday.
Maybe we can setup a crowd-source website to fund our hobby: gofu*kme.com.
Hahahahahha.
I yield the remainder of my time to the gentlemen from Tennessee.
-
01-20-26 19:45 #1251Senior Member

Posts: 587Got to give credit to you for filling the gap. Another win for the big tits crowd. Maybe this is SS88's specialty.
Originally Posted by Rebccu
[View Original Post]
-
01-20-26 19:42 #1250Senior Member

Posts: 587Yikes years. I might be out by 2027 haha but jokes aside, I'll take some of this into consideration. I can at least try the body and face separation because it has definitely been a thing. And Nia was exactly like that. I think I could have had a better time if I had just enjoyed what she was good at, being a petite spinner, rather than trying to get that GFE experience out of her.
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
Anyway, I'll see. I'll keep at it a little while longer. Maybe I save some guys, maybe someone else will save me. And I do think quality has risen a bit. Maybe they are all still GND, but there's no one I would rank below her since then. Or I've gotten better at dodging bullets haha.
This last bit is more towards my local comrades but even though we are into 2026 by now, it still might be interesting to see if anyone divides their list in a similar manner, or even a simple top 5. Since I only saw 20 ladies, top 25% is top 5 and next 5 makes it 50%. Simple enough. Although I don't feel as strongly about the "next 5" grouping. There's a few I could argue deserve the spot more for me. But we'll go with it as is.
Top 5: Yuria, Yaya, Angela, Mary, Momoka.
Next 5: Momo, Bobo, Mei Harusaki, Haru, Riri.
First link is a no go for me since it wants to register but the other two are fine. But seeing these, maybe it's just a Western thing. I just like it when they do even one, makes me feel better about them. They might get more sales the other way but I don't have to defend what I saw if they just give a hint. Plus it's kinda cute if they do an in room shot.
Originally Posted by BravoFox
[View Original Post]
Some of it is discussed here https://patrick-osaka.jp/blog/panel-...k-photostudio/#toc2 (although relying on a google translation to explain anything is likely flawed). But the section "Difference between panel photo and photo diary photo" supports that idea. So our shops here don't have diaries nor would it make sense to bother with that on some girl who may stay 5 days at best LOL. But I just like that element of reality. Probably also a fault of the starting girls. Yaya had real photos. Mei was fewer edits, but still aligned with her Gingira profile. Jojo I think was stock but never could confirm. And Mary may or may not have been but I think so because of her consistency in using those photos just for her.
But none of them used the "style" I saw so often in the times since. So it took awhile for me to get it, but at this point I'm pretty sure I've seen variations of that same studio 100 times over and I get almost nothing from it.
-
01-20-26 17:54 #1249Senior Member

Posts: 2204Yes, many cities are like this. Reviews do lead to reviews but that takes a long time, usually years. I mainly know kgirls, and the best looking one to pass through Nashville was Seven.
Originally Posted by Ayasaki
[View Original Post]
For looks, I split a girl's looks by face rating, body rating, and boob size. Age range of young (20s), medium (30s pre-MILF), old (40s MILF). Body is skinny, normal, thick. Once you split looks this way - especially face and body separate - people tend to agree a lot more. There are many butterfaces with awesome bodies for example. I call them body over face, and I'll see them if everything else is good. Guys who need a good face should not see them.
Everything is preference based. Some guys need a good body, some guys need a good face, others need both. Then there are actually guys who only care about tits no matter the rest. You've probably noticed there are many guys who actually prefer mature women, while many guys who prefer young women. So with these preferences, it's good enough to just list out a girl's details so each guy picks his girl. A skinny petite lover finds the skinny petite girl, the guy who loves a full bodied women with big tits and ass finds her. Both guys are happier with this info, for free.
I remember Nia J's appeal was she was a petite spinner. Face is GND and not the main attraction, she is not young but not old either. So if a guy is a spinner lover, he'll probaby like her. Each girl has a different appeal.
It's so few girls who rotate all the way West Coast it seems. Most of the intel is gathered simply by people seeing a girl locally. Exactly as you said. And same as you, I'm not going to necessarily mention a girl for a faraway city if I can't recommend her.
Local intel is still the way to go. If intel is scarce, it is good enough to highlight the best girls (top 25%) that come through. Additionally, to clearly list a girl's pros and cons if she's worth seeing (next 25%). For example, I like tits and ass but they're not critical to me. But when a girl has especially good tits or ass I point that out for the guys who want it.
-
01-20-26 14:29 #1248Senior Member

Posts: 39Hatti
Hatti is enthusiastic, energetic and a lot of fun!
The pictures are a good representation, but I can understand why the pictures cover her face. She has a very distinctive and attractive visage. She smiles with her eyes. Her lips are full. She has high cheekbones that make for a very photogenic, but very recognizable face. She has an amazing head of thick, naturally wavy hair. Highly worked out abs, beneath cantaloupe sized MMs. A sweet thin rear. Again, the vibe was instantaneous. I really dug her. You should definitely catch this one while you can.
So yes, this week I'm blowing the yearly bonus. $$$ hahaha.
-
01-20-26 14:23 #1247Senior Member

Posts: 1036Photo and Video
I believe the photo and video advertising is best. These examples below are how some do it differently. IMO Carol Assistant's are the highest quality photos and videos. However the girls in the room are generally not as dolled up. ECE does a good job as well with photo count and video representation.
https://www.carol-assistant.com/portfolio
https://www.ecechicago.com/models
https://www.discreetinfo.ch/city/indianapolis/
-
01-20-26 04:28 #1246Senior Member

Posts: 587I wanted to reply sooner but thought it might be good to let the review in between get a few hours of exposure, and it kind of worked out because I just ran across something that unfortunately complicates things.
Originally Posted by DownloadX
[View Original Post]
I enjoy trying to look for the hints because I just don't have much to work with a lot of times. And yes, that example where I pointed out Sena, they definitely cheated her with an age that took advantage of the fake ages. And I don't have the experience you have so I'm cautious about making certain looks claims. Since I've sort of learned a bit more, I unfortunately haven't seen many girls make it over there so I haven't been able to check against LA / OC ratings.
There were two times so far. Baby Nia J https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-nia-j and more recently Aiko J https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/aiko-j And I saw Stonkz looking forward to her but I was concerned "if I think she's 28 but what if I'm just entirely wrong and she's like 34 to better eyes, then I'm about to set him up for a bad time" on my recommendation. So I said nothing and he never visited and she left and I still have no frame of reference haha.
LA / OC also passed us one recently, Baby Hanna-J https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/baby-hanna-j but to the best of my knowledge, there was again zero information about her. Some other folks took one for the team with her when she was finally available and they were mostly pleased, but that was kind of a unicorn situation for our little city. But the last 3 girls before her? No reviews on this board except for me with this C-org. The K-org is doing just fine.
But what I am really getting at was, I just want a way to get the best info out for everyone with the least pain. And unfortunately, we don't often get enough reviews to tell anything. If I see a girl, and Joe sees a different girl, but we never see the same girl, we don't get to compare notes. And if we raise our standards too high, maybe the average Jgirl stops coming because she knows we aren't good business.
I wouldn't want to waste your time digging through our boards, so I'll give a sample of review counts for the C-orgs since October 27 (a new girl changed over then so I wanted to start there instead of November). Only ones in this topic, no TER involved.
- SSG Yuki (1)
- SSG Yoyo (just me)
- SSG Yuna (1)
- SSG Momo (just me)
- SSG Rei (2*)
- SSG Miyako (0)
- SSG Riri (just me)
- SSG Momoka (just me)
- SSG Sai (0)
- SS88 Angela(5, includes me)
- SS88 Wendy(2)
- SSG Sana (2)
- SS88 Ami (2)
- SS88 Mimi(3)
- SS88 Yuki(0)
- SSG Momona (2, includes me)
- SSG Noah (0*)
- SS88 Hatti (0 so far, she's new)
Of 18 girls, I've seen 6. 4 of those I'm the only review. I recently learned Rei had a third review as a 9/10 according to someone, but that info came months after she left, and consequently, there exists intel on Noah but it's not public info. But when I tried to book her myself anyway, she was fully booked on Saturday. So unless that was a lie to protect my feelings, there's a good number of people who know something about her but still 0 reviews on this board. Today is day 5 of listing and a lot of times they are leaving by this point.
But looking at this I find it difficult to understand what "we" like here. Other than apparently Chinese Angela with the big natural tits. She's even proof that intel works because we all knew those pictures were 100% fake minus her close up self shot of her breasts. But we usually don't reach that level of consensus much less in a timely manner. So that's why I end up digging for scraps based on their photos. I would like to switch to 100% local intel but I don't know if we can get to that point.
-
01-19-26 15:18 #1245Senior Member

Posts: 39Alyssa
Absolutely delightful! She is a tall, buxom beauty brimming with energy and so eager to please. The vibe was instantaneous. The greeting at the door was in an outfit similar to the photos. Body: Killer.
Her pleasing nature makes it so easy to relax into. The activities were numerous, but at a relaxed pace. Today was a good day for me, so I was feeling strong. There wasn't much time for talk. However, before leaving, I asked about the pictures and an earlier review which estimated her age far, far higher than it is. She accommodated my request and I can confirm for you that she is in her early 30's. The picture of her standing up in the red outfit is the most accurate I would say.
-
01-19-26 14:42 #1244Senior Member

Posts: 2204Yes, touring jgirls generally have final say and supply ad photos. It doesn't mean they put a lot of thought into it or that someone didn't do all the work making them. Obviously with studio photos they go in for the photo shoot and the resulting product is the work of the studio and she gets the results. But among the photos she has, she can pick and choose which ones to supply. Or choose other photos she has.
Originally Posted by JoeB119
[View Original Post]
Occasionally jgirls don't even have their own photos or don't want to use them. So the booker or shop can supply them. But the girl still had the chance and final say in that sense. So even if almost all the work or even choice was done by someone else, that's only to the extent she relinquishes it. Girls are free to pick any ad photo they wish. And they often have no awareness on the ins and outs of ad photo accuracy or strategy. Many don't put much thought into it.
I've heard many people talk about age hints using the age listed in the ad. Maybe there is some correlation, you know better than me on that. But it's not been helpful to me because I don't want a clue that "maybe/probably she isn't old". I want to be sure.
Originally Posted by Ayasaki
[View Original Post]
Due to the temptation of abusing age numbers, eventually they list a 21 year old girl and she's 40+ MILF or 50+ GILF. It happened last week again with Baby Semi. 21 can be 40s or 50s.
If this were the only hint available, I can see why you want to use it. I know I'm unusual, but I found the disappointment meant it wasn't worth even looking. So in the dark ages I would walk into every appointment fully blind, without looking at ad photos or stats. I deliberately looked away at any photos, I told the booker to give me a list of names and I picked one. Once I decided on this way, I never looked even one time for more than 10 years. I was definitely happier because I kept an open mind. If the lady was older, she generally had solid service. If I had expected a young girl, I would have been less happy with that.
Now, I've moved on and just want younger girls with an occasional mature girl mixed in. So I need to use something besides ad photos and stats for that.
Jgirls tend to be mostly at least young, but young doesn't mean hot. I'm pretty flexible on looks but I'm trying to avoid the worst case there. I'd actually prefer a hot MILF over an ugly young girl so to speak.
One thing about ad photos is no matter what I think or do, most people use them and overvalue them. It's human nature. So the best we can do is if we do have info on a girl's looks, we share it and compare notes. People will eventually switch over to intel like that and naturally use ad photos less. Ad photos basically work when there is no intel.
-
01-19-26 12:06 #1243Senior Member

Posts: 587Hmm well you got me beat there LOL. I guess I just see that "style" too much and it just starts to blend in. And this is only with 6 months frame of reference, imagine people who've been seeing this for years haha. This post happened over in NOVA if you just want to see what I see.
Originally Posted by JoeB119
[View Original Post]
Age is something I'm fairly negotiable on but I get it. I know some places don't list ages usually so. Can't lie if you never tell haha.
But let me deal with what I do know, SSG ages are also off but they are in a range. A very specific range. And I ran across a post recently discussing the concept of "Yoshiwara Age". Should be safe to link since I've seen people reference this site. But I'll drop an image here too. https://tokyoadultguide.com/threads/...nfusing.31502/.
Now SSG isn't *actually* Japanese, but the idea just might be accepted. I think it has likely matched up with this version, and not the 5 ages version. I don't have everyone recorded because of mistakes. But:
* 20 (20-22): Karen, Hana, Nana, Kara, Emma, Mika, Erika, Ami, Momo.
* 21 (23-25): Aona, Jolie, Rumi, Elsa, Sena, Rei, Riri, Sai, Noah, Yaya, Mei Harusaki.
* 22 (26-28): Otani Momo, Haru, Yuria, Yuki, Yuna, Miyako, Sana, Momona.
* 23 (29-31): Viki, Jia, Alex.
* 24 (32-34): Qiqi, Mary, Jojo, Grace (Bella).
If I account for those adjustments, it's a lot more realistic. Since 25 has never been used, I assume it's really 32+ for that category. I suspect the 23 age Koreans probably should also be moved up. And the two highlighted. Well I never saw Miyako so no guarantee there but as bad as I am about ages, Sena definitely should be in the "24" group. No insult to her, I still liked her, but I share this so maybe you can see if this helps you get a hint the next time it comes up. Perhaps SS88 follows suit, Angela was "23" after all.
-
01-19-26 10:09 #1242Senior Member

Posts: 72Photos & Sai vs Sana
I can't speak for everyone, when I look at the photos, there is (or needs to be) something that I find seductive in the shoot that gets my juices flowiing. It could be face, body type, clothing. It really doesn't take much but then my mind keeps going to that one thing. I was really curious to see Yuki a few weeks ago, with her leggy slender body. Hattie pics had me too until I saw the feet, now I can't unsee it. LOL. However Ellen over at CCG could be interesting from her reviews but pics do not sound accurate.
Originally Posted by Ayasaki
[View Original Post]
Case in point, given the 2 images you shared, I would have chosen Sai over Sana- just find the look more appealing. I never got to see Sai while she was here, can't remember why, maybe I had other things going on or Kimmie was in town or someone else had slightly more allure. Personally for me I'd say the biggest turn off is the misrepresentation of age- which happens everywhere. Not that there is anything wrong with a 40 yo beautiful Asian lady, just when I'm ramped up going in expecting 25 and get 40, it's a huge letdown.
Originally Posted by Ayasaki
[View Original Post]
-
01-19-26 07:46 #1241Senior Member

Posts: 587I haven't had those conversations, although I almost wish I had gotten more info from Yuria, she had shared a cosplay photoshoot she did. Anyway, I would agree.
Originally Posted by JoeB119
[View Original Post]
But back to the photos, the girls are the source but I'm also sure they can be influenced if it becomes known that a community prefers to see a certain type of photos. I do want to be clear, I'm not saying they all have to dox themselves, but when you do something better one place and worse somewhere else, it probably hurts your sales.
So my comments aren't going to change an entire system haha. Heck it is done in their home country (bonus photo attached) so I can't even hope to suggest that it become a rule. But that's why I try to give credit to the girls that make that step.
But here's one final bonus. As much as we review them, we are also being reviewed I'm sure (as a city, not a guy), so I'm also not going to say skip every girl with studio only photos. Or every girl with real photos but isn't perfect. But I think we are picking up momentum that Columbus, OH might have given up, so making the girls happy like some of you did with Sana in December, matters. And why was Sana so successful? I had zero influence on that one.
New people reviewing. Lots of photos. All of the few reviews said photo accurate. I mean there had to be some reason you guys favored her and ignored Sai haha.
-
01-19-26 00:59 #1240Senior Member

Posts: 72A few more thoughts on photo reality.
I am going to throw this out there as a consideration on this topic. Photos may be directed by providers and agencies are arms length. Hear me out, I've had some conversations with a few girls at different agencies none of whom I will name. From what I was told, they are responsible for compensating the agencies and not the other way around. And that includes cleaner bro. That means if they don't get enough clients, then they don't have enough to "pay the rent". Also sounds like the agencies are somewhat beholding to the girls and their plans. As such, I think it is not a stretch to think the agencies are very happy to keep themselves very separate from any provider and likely do not even verify photos. As long as they provide the needed support, it's a symbiotic relationship.
Bottom line. It's the girls and not the agencies driving the photos. Agencies have the reputation for future engagements so do not want to see anything reflecting so poorly that will keep people away but within reasonableness, I don't think anyone cares.
Just 2 c.
Originally Posted by Ayasaki
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-26 22:54 #1239Senior Member

Posts: 64Angela Gone?
Hey all! Stopping in for a visit in the next few weeks. Some Latina sounds perfect but it looks like she isn't on the website. Assuming she rotated out but if there is another spot to look would appreciate the info. Also interested in any other good Latina references anyone might have. Appreciate it and DMs always open as well.
Originally Posted by BravoFox
[View Original Post]
-
01-18-26 15:40 #1238Senior Member

Posts: 587Well you've nailed the real challenge of reporting in a small city with low trust. And why this creates a nearly impossible scenario for us. There is a school of thought that the ads photos should simply be ignored and they are useless. Intel from real users is paramount. I agree but actually getting that intel is the issue.
Originally Posted by JoeB119
[View Original Post]
I want to go in detail but I'll shorten it to this (unless requested). If we assume all photos are worthless, then what becomes the deciding factor between going to see SS88 Hatti, SS88 Mimi, SSG Noah, and CCG Angelina. If it is review count, you will never see anyone at SS88 or SSG lol. So let me just scratch out CCG, what are my reasons to go see Hatti vs Noah? China vs Japan? So for me if I'm TOFTT, I just prefer it to be Japanese basically and I find their photos while often edited, most give me something if I have nothing else to go on. Sometimes (maybe 30%) you reverse search the Japanese girls and get a more realistic photo from their time at a delivery health / soap / etc place.
I'm good with the Chinese girls too, SS88 Angela was well reviewed and I liked her a ton. And deep down I still kinda want to see SSG Mary and Yaya again. But I'm not going to TOFTT across AMPs and two agencies every week lol.






Reply With Quote




