Rubrankings.com
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
Live Escorts

Thread: Asian Providers

+ Add Report
Page 16 of 580 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 66 116 516 ... LastLast
Results 226 to 240 of 8700
This blog is moderated by Dog Rice
  1. #8475

    Respect

    You are a good fella.

    Quote Originally Posted by LongCal  [View Original Post]
    This injury physically slowed my hobbying down to a crawl, but if I find myself able to share something new Ill post what I can, enjoy fellas.

  2. #8474
    Reference checks can get tricky between rivals. Hx network makes that easy peasy. It takes some time and effort but it is the way to go. You don't want any PII out there. My advice is to stop messaging him, get 3-4 connections on hx and then try again. Good luck.

    Quote Originally Posted by StoopidKevin  [View Original Post]
    Hi all: I've been trying to get verified with BR through Hx and I'm having a lot more difficulty than I did when verifying with Xoxo, which was nearly immediate.

    By contrast, I didn't get a reply back to my message on Hx until 12 hours later the next day. The response basically scolded me for saying I'm approved through Xoxo on my introduction message. WTF. The told me to have Xoxo add me to their network. They didn't respond to my message sent hours ago about independently verifying me outside of Hx.

    I guess my question is, is this normal? I only have experience with the two agencies, and the stark contrast between the responses I got from them make me question what I did wrong, given all the good reviews for BR.

  3. #8473
    Quote Originally Posted by StoopidKevin  [View Original Post]
    Hi all: I've been trying to get verified with BR through Hx and I'm having a lot more difficulty than I did when verifying with Xoxo, which was nearly immediate.

    By contrast, I didn't get a reply back to my message on Hx until 12 hours later the next day. The response basically scolded me for saying I'm approved through Xoxo on my introduction message. WTF. The told me to have Xoxo add me to their network. They didn't respond to my message sent hours ago about independently verifying me outside of Hx.

    I guess my question is, is this normal? I only have experience with the two agencies, and the stark contrast between the responses I got from them make me question what I did wrong, given all the good reviews for BR.
    Yup. I don't think that response is surprising. Get networked with the other agencies and it shouldn't be an issue.

  4. #8472
    Quote Originally Posted by SsStuntCock  [View Original Post]
    Sheesh, over two years chilling on the sideline? She must be decent to earn your review. Welcome back and TOFTT.
    Unfortunately I was not sidelined by choice, dealt with a severe back and hip injury with major nerve damage along with the normal changes life brings. Still not 100 percent recovered but was so thoroughly surprised Baby Sarah got two out of me that I felt obligated to spread some love for her here. This injury physically slowed my hobbying down to a crawl, but if I find myself able to share something new Ill post what I can, enjoy fellas.

  5. #8471

    Booker for BR

    Hi all: I've been trying to get verified with BR through Hx and I'm having a lot more difficulty than I did when verifying with Xoxo, which was nearly immediate.

    By contrast, I didn't get a reply back to my message on Hx until 12 hours later the next day. The response basically scolded me for saying I'm approved through Xoxo on my introduction message. WTF. The told me to have Xoxo add me to their network. They didn't respond to my message sent hours ago about independently verifying me outside of Hx.

    I guess my question is, is this normal? I only have experience with the two agencies, and the stark contrast between the responses I got from them make me question what I did wrong, given all the good reviews for BR.

  6. #8470
    Quote Originally Posted by Zehe123  [View Original Post]
    I don't see a baby Sarah. Is she under another name?
    https://www.xoxo-club.com/sandiegomodels

    https://www.xoxo-club.com/babysarah

  7. #8469
    Quote Originally Posted by LongCal  [View Original Post]
    Baby Sarah XOXO Club.

    P: Pictures are accurate that is definitely her with minimum P.S. Her body is slightly more petite but represented well.

    L: 5'2, looks late 20's to 30, Japanese Korean mix beautiful face like her pics, petite body, possible man made but looks natural B's with dark areolas, petite hips but nice handful of ass. Skinny and a slightly toned, not porcelain white skin but somewhat tan with no tattoos.

    E: Minimum English but can get by, translator will help tremendously she is fluent in Japanese and Korean.

    A: Newby nervous vibes, polite and submissive will follow directions well if you lead.

    S: Honor of being her first in SD, but not certain how she may respond with time so YMMV. Looks over service, very polite she said she was nervous so feels new and inexperienced to the scene. Build rapport and comfort she will reciprocate our chemistry was good but had to take the lead in all manners. Submissive vibe when engaging responds like a Japanese AV model and vocal. Very tight pussy may not be magnum approved, I thought I was incapable of MSOG at my age but she got me off twice to my great surprise. You are what you make of your session, Baby Sarah will follow with no complaints.

    E: 340 HR with inclusive BB +40 MSOG.

    Are: Repeat worthy, yes for me.
    I don't see a baby Sarah. Is she under another name?

  8. #8468
    Quote Originally Posted by LongCal  [View Original Post]
    Honor of being her first in SD, but not certain how she may respond with time so YMMV. Looks over service, very polite she said she was nervous so feels new and inexperienced to the scene. Build rapport and comfort she will reciprocate our chemistry was good but had to take the lead in all manners. Submissive vibe when engaging responds like a Japanese AV model and vocal. Very tight pussy may not be magnum approved, I thought I was incapable of MSOG at my age but she got me off twice to my great surprise. You are what you make of your session, Baby Sarah will follow with no complaints.
    Sheesh, over two years chilling on the sideline? She must be decent to earn your review. Welcome back and TOFTT.

  9. #8467
    Quote Originally Posted by Gbrand  [View Original Post]
    I tried to book with Nabi yesterday (Saturday) but she had already left. I asked the booker when she would come back to San Diego, but he said she was retiring and moving back to Korea on the 15th. I know other providers I've seen in the past that have retired delete their own TER's when they retire. Guess they don't want their past to haunt them.

    On the other hand, some girls that change cities want to start fresh, and don't want negative reviews to follow them to a new city their working in to get a fresh start.

    There was also a scandal in Minnesota where an agency was raided, and ALL of the girls that worked at that agency had their TER I'd's removed (Seri at XOXO was one of them, which is too bad because she had over 100 stellar reviews).

    Also, for those of us that have been here for a while, you might remember that all of SDAG's girls had their reviews removed from TER because the booker threatened banning dudes that gave bad reviews to his girls.
    Here's some additional info about TER to be considered when we chat about "delistings", "banning", "bookers" in this forum.

    Fun fact #1: TER tracks every IP Address that does a login or visit. That IP Address is tied to a Username / Agency / Visitor. In effect, you get one identity per IP Address and TER knows who you are. For the techies in the group, yes your IP ADDR is also tied to your cell IMEI, cell type, Windows or Mac, browser, city, state, zip, the previous URL and the URL you went to after logoff. Yes, very intrusive but that's the Internet norm, even for Walmart.

    FUN FACT #2: TER has over one million registered users, 2 Million Plus reviews, and over 250,000 unique users daily. That info is from academic / advocacy research, not from the site itself.

    FUN FACT #3: Yes, agencies do contact TER to have ladies delisted, usually because of bad reviews. Yes, some agencies screwed up on the PR side as example by the former SDAG group and that was over two years ago, give or take. I'm too fucking old to really care since they are now solid in being low cost, solid talent, and expanding into new girls of Latina, Japanese, and Vietnamese descent.

    Bottom line. Don't believe everything you read until you can research it yourself. Reviews left by mongers here and TER should be considered fictional with a thread of truth. It's good to question and exchange thoughts / ideas but please remember, we are here to gather information not spread rumors. Verify.

  10. #8466

    Baby Sarah Reveiw

    Baby Sarah XOXO Club.

    P: Pictures are accurate that is definitely her with minimum P.S. Her body is slightly more petite but represented well.

    L: 5'2, looks late 20's to 30, Japanese Korean mix beautiful face like her pics, petite body, possible man made but looks natural B's with dark areolas, petite hips but nice handful of ass. Skinny and a slightly toned, not porcelain white skin but somewhat tan with no tattoos.

    E: Minimum English but can get by, translator will help tremendously she is fluent in Japanese and Korean.

    A: Newby nervous vibes, polite and submissive will follow directions well if you lead.

    S: Honor of being her first in SD, but not certain how she may respond with time so YMMV. Looks over service, very polite she said she was nervous so feels new and inexperienced to the scene. Build rapport and comfort she will reciprocate our chemistry was good but had to take the lead in all manners. Submissive vibe when engaging responds like a Japanese AV model and vocal. Very tight pussy may not be magnum approved, I thought I was incapable of MSOG at my age but she got me off twice to my great surprise. You are what you make of your session, Baby Sarah will follow with no complaints.

    E: 340 HR with inclusive BB +40 MSOG.

    Are: Repeat worthy, yes for me.

  11. #8465

    Re: Kgirls on TER

    The format there doesn't really work for girls that bounce around from agency to agency and city to city. Which almost all of them do. (in a major metropolitan area like NYC or LA I think you get a few more who just stay around, but pretty rare here).

    If you search "new reviews in san diego" it shows you a bunch of reviews for girls across the country that were once reviewed in San Diego. If you search for a girl that has arrived in San Diego you search for her name and you may or may not get any hits, or you may get 20 hits, none of which are her.

  12. #8464

    Nabi and Erica.

    Quote Originally Posted by SlamTown76  [View Original Post]
    Thanks for the info. I also noticed that Erica on XoXo has almost a dozen of positive reviews on TER but I think her tour just started and I can't find any reviews of her on this site. Curious if this will become an ongoing trend with XoXo.
    I tried to book with Nabi yesterday (Saturday) but she had already left. I asked the booker when she would come back to San Diego, but he said she was retiring and moving back to Korea on the 15th. I know other providers I've seen in the past that have retired delete their own TER's when they retire. Guess they don't want their past to haunt them.

    On the other hand, some girls that change cities want to start fresh, and don't want negative reviews to follow them to a new city their working in to get a fresh start.

    There was also a scandal in Minnesota where an agency was raided, and ALL of the girls that worked at that agency had their TER I'd's removed (Seri at XOXO was one of them, which is too bad because she had over 100 stellar reviews).

    Also, for those of us that have been here for a while, you might remember that all of SDAG's girls had their reviews removed from TER because the booker threatened banning dudes that gave bad reviews to his girls.

    TBH, I'm not sure how much the bookers themselves work with TER. In fact, I contact TER myself when I see a new girl who's just come to San Diego doesn't have her reviews show up in a search for "Asian Providers in San Diego". This drives me crazy that TER doesn't do this on there own (or the bookers either). It's the least that we can do for both the girls as well as us mongers.

    Enough said about TER reviews. Like with all reviews (Amazon, Hotels.com, etc.), we need to take them with a grain of salt, throw out the extreme highs and lows, and use our best judgement.

    As for Erica, this is her 2nd stint in San Diego. She is friends with Lizzy (aka, Koy) and was here for a short visit earlier this month. She worked in San Jose with Lizzy before coming to San Diego.

    If you haven't seen Erica, you don't want to miss out. She is the cutest, tiniest, youngest looking I've ever seen (true Lolita fantasy material).

    Here's a link to my post on Erica from Nov. 09.

    https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/sho...ders&p=7438876#post7438876.

  13. #8463

    Good to know

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar300ZX  [View Original Post]
    Don't blame the TER reports, -they're accurate, true, and honest!! . it's the *XOXO Club Agency that is trying to pull a fast one.

    Over on a different forum a fellow monger posted a report about a session with Nabi at XOXO.

    The report sounded a little ShiII-why to me, so I inquired why the link to Nabi's posted TER No. # (Originally TER 381003 posted on the XOXO Club website) said; "Provider information is no longer available on TER".

    The Monger replied saying; "The Booker put the wrong TER number on their Website, try TER 408518 instead" Well, this made me suspicious, -So I looked-up this 2nd TER Profile.

    Looking at TER No. # 408518, the name 'Nabi' was the same, but there were multiple TER reviewer comments that were different from the Monger's session report.

    I copy and pasted four of the TER No. # 408518 reviewer comments that had negative comments and differing descriptions about Nabi which didn't match the Monger's session report. (See Below).

    Then suddenly, Nabi's TER 408518 profile also disappeared, exactly like what happened with Nabi (TER 381003) saying; "Provider information is no longer available on TER".

    It appears that XOXO Club Agency has the ability to create these TER profiles (trying to prop-up their providers on a legitimate review forum like TER)..
    Thanks for the info. I also noticed that Erica on XoXo has almost a dozen of positive reviews on TER but I think her tour just started and I can't find any reviews of her on this site. Curious if this will become an ongoing trend with XoXo.

  14. #8462
    Quote Originally Posted by PhantomRain  [View Original Post]
    Reminded me not to trust TER. Likely 40's. Face not for me at all. Couple small tats around waist. Really nice lady attitude wise but body was not as slim as I prefer and face was way off the mark for me. Best thing she has going for her is that BBBJ though which saved the day. Offers Greek. Didn't partake as I was not attracted at all.
    Don't blame the TER reports, -they're accurate, true, and honest!! . it's the *XOXO Club Agency that is trying to pull a fast one.

    Over on a different forum a fellow monger posted a report about a session with Nabi at XOXO.

    The report sounded a little ShiII-why to me, so I inquired why the link to Nabi's posted TER No. # (Originally TER 381003 posted on the XOXO Club website) said; "Provider information is no longer available on TER".

    The Monger replied saying; "The Booker put the wrong TER number on their Website, try TER 408518 instead" Well, this made me suspicious, -So I looked-up this 2nd TER Profile.

    Looking at TER No. # 408518, the name 'Nabi' was the same, but there were multiple TER reviewer comments that were different from the Monger's session report.

    I copy and pasted four of the TER No. # 408518 reviewer comments that had negative comments and differing descriptions about Nabi which didn't match the Monger's session report. (See Below).

    Then suddenly, Nabi's TER 408518 profile also disappeared, exactly like what happened with Nabi (TER 381003) saying; "Provider information is no longer available on TER".

    It appears that XOXO Club Agency has the ability to create these TER profiles (trying to prop-up their providers on a legitimate review forum like TER).

    Then, the Agency corrupts real mongers and encourages ShiII-why reviews on various other forums, -but the Agency can't control the true and honest reviews of real mongers on TER.

    So when things begin to look bad for the provider, the Agency just deletes the TER profile they created.

    Apparently, the Agency gets feedback from their corrupted mongers, and monitors ShiII-why reviews (and well as, comments of suspicious mongers like me).

    And then POOF! The TER profile disappears. That's why I think (We) Real Mongers should be the ones creating TER profiles, and Not the Agency!!

    Nabi (TER 381003) "Provider information no longer available on TER".

    Nabi (TER 408518) from Emeryille, Bay Area & Tustin, Los Angeles.

    TER 408518 Nov. 2025 by Monger Wbchipotle (Emeryville CA) - "Nabi is a bit older in the face but she does have a tight body for her age".

    TER 408518 Oct. 2025 by Monger AAYUSHADK07 (Emeryille, Bay Area CA) - "Stunning in person, bit different and older than the photos".

    TER 408518 Oct. 2025 by Monger SAEGEN (Emeryville CA) - ". The pictures are pretty heavily edited and Nabi, while still quite attractive, was not quite the person presented on the web".

    TER 408518 Sep. 2025 by Monger TMAW888 (Known Location) -"Was looking at Nabi for. Some Greek. Wasn't what I was expecting from other reviews".

    -Then POOF! Nabi (TER 408518) "Provider information no longer available on TER".

  15. #8461
    Quote Originally Posted by Gbrand  [View Original Post]
    I completely agree. As I left the booker texted and asked "How was Jewelry".

    My response was the same: "WOW!

    This girl is F-cking HOT! Her face reminds me a little of Tiana (at FEC), maybe cuter. She has an incredibly beautiful smile and eye's. Huge D cup MM's which fit her body perfectly. Totally GFE (more on the LFK side). Gives an awesome soft, teasing BBBJ (Dude's attached description nailed it). BBBJ on the side of the bed, then switch. I was going to go for DATY, but we started camel sliding on the edge of the bed and it slid in her already dripping wet pussy bare. Jewelry is so tight, and can take a pounding. Ended up going for DATY, and she is super sensitive (only a couple of minutes until she was done). Climbed back on top and released a huge load deep inside this HYA.

    She cleaned me up, and I asked how old. She asked me to guess - 24. She moved her thumbs upward, and said 26.

    Jewelry is an absolute must repeat. I've said this with the last 2 girls (Erica and Elva) but they left too quickly. Not going to let this one get away without a repeat performance.
    I would put her age closer to 30. But I agree with the other sentiments. Cute, hot body, well taken care of skin. Speaks basically no english and doesn't need to. After around 1 she excused herself to clean up, came back for a little cuddling and then laid herself on my thigh and played it until it was ready for round 2. Very passionate rider. Even after I unloaded she kept grinding herself until every last drop was milked, then she collapsed on top of me for a while before getting up and looking down to watch it drip out of her back onto my belly.

    Absolute banger of a session.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Tier Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Top Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape