Thread: NoVA SugarBabies
+
Add Report
Results 466 to 480 of 16275
-
11-28-25 18:06 #15810Senior Member

Posts: 901Peach
https://caseyrosephotography.com/hol...r-photography/
https://members.seeking.com/member/8...a-d76619456b0f
Doesn't want to discuss anything until m&g.
I found additional pics of her so its a big nah for me.
Girnextdoor.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4...4-3b42d2ab5986
Old Asian chick. I don't even know why I chatted with her. Wants a ongoing relationship and 1 k ppm.
Like ***** you're old and busted. You should pay me.
-
11-28-25 13:40 #15809Senior Member

Posts: 68Emma, 30, DC
She is real, just the photos are significantly touched up and a lot of makeup.
High energy / talker but we didn't vibe great. Nice woman.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...7-f84f14fc7f33
-
11-27-25 14:44 #15808Regular Member

Posts: 26I apologize for the bad links. Copy paste for the fail. If you go to this post: https://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/sho...109&viewfull=1#post7454109.
All the links should work.
-
11-27-25 12:18 #15807Senior Member

Posts: 68Man I sure do miss the Covid glory days
There used to be no shortage of college / sorority type gurls 18-22 that would be on the site. I don't know where these girls have vanished to. Maybe they've realized it's relatively easy to get someone's identity from the site, and don't want to risk it I don't know. But this is one reason why the talent pool is just so bad right now. Another reason is a lot of like local "influencer" type girls used to be on the site. I'm sure they've built up a Rolodex and do this off the site, but it was a lot easier to find girls like that back then. They were generally of higher quality than the girls currently on the site.
-
11-27-25 10:30 #15806Senior Member

Posts: 364Re: Unfortunately, all broken links
Indeed. The links work on Thulenewmam's post on the "WYP, SA, and other SD sites" thread. I guess there was a glitch in the copy and paste.
Originally Posted by Shinshi
[View Original Post]
-
11-27-25 03:15 #15805Senior Member

Posts: 560Unfortunately, all broken links
However, some of the profiles kinda match with what I was able to dig up in some searches. Appreciate the intel.
Originally Posted by Thulenewman
[View Original Post]
-
11-26-25 20:39 #15804Regular Member

Posts: 26(MD mostly) data dump
I posted this in the Baltimore group, but NOVA is more active and frequently discusses topics in Maryland, so thought I'd share here as well.
Breanna: real, looks like her pictures. Unsure of what she is up for, we had drinks and that was it. Some odd texting behavior scared me off from her, but her pics are accurate, so maybe you'll have better luck.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...4-a2d7636880b9
Bondgirl: real, looks like her pics. Was not clear with what she offered.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b...d-9359ddd3bf18
Lena: Offered a hookup for 4, unable to host.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...d-c4de43aea357
Skylar: Real, looks better in person. I am not sure what she asks for others. I have some discount plan with her apparently. Really nice girl.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...9-44e5db437804
Kayla: Met once, too much smoking, and looked older than her pics. I passed.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...e-80fd7e8e5259
Nikki: She is a real one. Heaver than her pics indicate, but is a really nice girl and open for affordable play.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1...6-cf0ccf1a4230
Lauren: Heavier than her pics (see a pattern here?) But is a nice girl, and is open for play. Has a bit of GPS.
https://members.seeking.com/member/c...0-1c3aacdb3d1c
Avrenim: Weird. I met in person, she was cagy and odd with me. No indication of offering any playtime.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...a-fe7c0e90eb92
Baby4 You: She is a real one, looks like her pics, and is ready for play basically 24/7. Usually in a low rent motel. She is a nice girl, but smokes a ton.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...6-6cded3b72c35
Trinity: Is much skinner than her pics, perhaps indication of use of some sort. Had a chubby female friend with her hiding in the bathroom. Very low rent incall.
https://members.seeking.com/member/5...7-f0f3431cf8cb
Vanessa: Hosts, huge smoker, does not look much like her pics - 30-40 pounds heavier. GPS for what she offers.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...e-1cf1f65a4511
Jennifer: Real one. Looks better in person. A fun play session.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...4-d175d575e9f2
Sari: hosts from her home. Fun play session.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-545ff0e1fb9d
SassyNikki: I am 95% sure she is a pro. May be two accounts for the same girl.
https://members.seeking.com/member/4...5-98476f0aedf8
https://members.seeking.com/member/9...f-56ddab765c57
-
11-26-25 13:37 #15803Senior Member

Posts: 901Her pics look good. So she's using older pics and just catfishing. After 2 kids and age 30 - her body is definitely sagging -.
Originally Posted by Kpop1
[View Original Post]
-
11-26-25 12:56 #15802Senior Member

Posts: 163Baby Momma
Recently moved to the DC area from NC. Will start sending you nudes without asking and seems real. Has a baby however found it strange she would be out drinking with her baby with her. Slightly heavier than her profile pics suggest. Never discussed compensation. Won't be pursuing as she's on the chubbier side for me as well as possible drama.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...a-1fbb8054e139
-
11-26-25 12:43 #15801Senior Member

Posts: 163Reached out for shits and giggle through her Tryst number. Requested a recent picture, testing and $1,200 per hour. Told her sure, however does this mean you would be sending me a recent pic with your testing as well? Went silent LOL. Who the fuck asks for this on Tyrst. Don't think she will go too far in the industry.
Originally Posted by TomFordModel
[View Original Post]
-
11-26-25 09:54 #15800Senior Member

Posts: 68Star, 22, Arlington
Pictures accurate.
Seems like she has had a challenging time.
Wants 500 and wants to see a recent test.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...d-2452d7788258
-
11-25-25 18:50 #15799Senior Member

Posts: 264Zar??
https://members.seeking.com/member/b...f-163c60cb4197
Anyone meet with this one yet?? Supposed to meet next week!
TIA.
-
11-25-25 16:23 #15798Senior Member

Posts: 560You're not wrong, I agree 100% with you! But many--if not most--sugar babies won't see it that way.
Originally Posted by CuriousVaMan
[View Original Post]
This is why I'm pretty direct beforehand that a first meet will always be at a Starbucks or bar near their place. I would point out the advantages: they won't be wasting much time as it's close to their home, I don't waste money at a restaurant, and both of us can go our separate ways if expectations / demands aren't in alignment from said M&G. First meets is where both sides lay the ground rules of what the sugaring relationship will look like (agreeing to a reasonable PPM price that includes fucking). If they want to host, great! And if they prefer me to get a hotel instead, that's fine too so long as it's communicated ahead of time.
The millisecond that I hear demands for Uber ride money (which might not even be for Uber in the first place), coming across as a snobbish brat & expecting gifts because she look at guys as "pay pigs" (that's apparently a thing), PBM (please don't ever do this, guys), having shitty comms the day of, or wanting some other stuff that I'm not entirely comfortable with? Nope, time to cut ties and move on. We johns are allowed to have standards & expectations too. Plenty of fish in the sea, and no one should overpay for pussy. Better to save up and have a blast elsewhere outside of the DMV.
-
11-25-25 12:42 #15797Senior Member

Posts: 473Ppfs
I think the correct term for you. Me and the rest of the community is not PPM, but PPFS. Pay Per Fuck Session.
Originally Posted by FarFarAway
[View Original Post]
-
11-25-25 09:28 #15796Senior Member

Posts: 901Obviously, her ivy league education didn't add any value since her profession is a prostitute I remember seeing her pics she's mid. I refuse to believe anyone would pay more than 5.
Originally Posted by SRH59
[View Original Post]






Reply With Quote




