Thread: KAngels Discussion
+
Add Report
Results 46 to 60 of 6031
-
11-14-25 20:34 #5986
AP Luca. The Queef Queen
Pics are fairly unrepresentative. I like her look but it might not be for everyone, huge cheekbones but in what I think is a cute way. She's low / mid 30's, good energy, fun, likes to laugh. English is 3/10. Small C bolt ons, hard, no movement. Best part was her ass, it was legit. Rare to find a k-girl with junk in the trunk but it was juicy and round and just right. Doggy was a lovely sight esp when I stayed still and she was twerking it on my cock. She's also got larger legs than most k-girls, more of a latina-like bottom half which I enjoyed.
BBBJ is on point, golf ball through garden hose. Serious suction and max pleasure. Pussy is not tight (except when she cums / squeezes) and she queefed the entire time. It was pretty hilarious how much. During the second round I'd been hitting her from behind for a long time and I took matters into my own hand to try to finish. She got up and on her knees but otherwise vertical and let out a long, slow, quiet queef that I think embarrassed her. She said "so much air" and I laughed which seemed to relax her.
Anyway, was a good time, would recommend unless you need a tight one. 1xCIP, couldn't get the second round off but she gave it a good try. She massaged me for a few minutes between rounds and seemed to know what she was doing, it felt good and not like a physical assault which is how some of them do it.
-
11-14-25 20:11 #5985
+1
I've had the same experience. When they have asked for feedback and I have responded positively, I've seen my comments show up the next day.
Originally Posted by Arisotto
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-25 18:17 #5984They are real, my comments to the booker usually shows up on the site. If the encounter was less than average I usually don't rely to booker asking for feedback. In my experience the length / number of reviews that booker posts generally correlates to a more favorable encounter. Originally Posted by DS080
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-25 18:03 #5983
Are the reviews on AP profiles pages real? Has yours really posted there? Maybe the number of reviews can be a good indicator for how good the providers are. For example, Mai got only one, while others who've been at AP shorter got way more reviews.
-
11-14-25 15:52 #5982After previous experiences I won't see one without TER reviews. I base the decision off that. Originally Posted by DS080
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-25 14:26 #5981
Anybody got intel on Mai and/or Mina. I don't want to pick a provider based on profile pics alone. Learned my lesson with Lucy at KA.
-
11-14-25 13:27 #5980Where did you get this info? What is 'utah agency'? Originally Posted by ShinamotoJason
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-25 12:53 #5979Hopefully easier access to other locations in other cities if they're affiliated and can vouch instead of going through verification at each place. Originally Posted by NampaBoi
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-25 12:08 #5978
Future
What does this mean moving forward? Originally Posted by ShinamotoJason
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-25 22:45 #5977Troll, if you don't put me on ignore then don't complain about what I post
Posts: 437It appears that girlfriendinseattle, now the Utah agency, has taken over kangels.
-
11-13-25 21:07 #5976To be honest, I don't really remember much but she wasn't big or fat at all. Tall and skinny / lean? Probably above 95 but she wasn't all bone either so probably not much above the listed weight. Light enough for me to toss her onto the bed and I'm weak as hell but still heavy enough to pin me down while she was on top riding. Tits were pretty accurate and not far off Originally Posted by SnS69
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-25 18:45 #5975
KA Lime
How close is she to the 95 lbs she's listed at? If the height AND weight are accurate, I'll have to take her for a spin. Originally Posted by Eric4321
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-25 18:05 #5974Really wish there was a way to get screened without the level of risk providing personal details. They say they'll delete verification pics after screening, but that's no guarantee. Is it in the agency's interest to retain that info? Or does it behoove them to purge their black books? Originally Posted by TotalChad
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-25 17:51 #5973
KA Lime
I realized I visit KA and AP all the time but I never remember if I've seen the girl or not on a previous visit cause a lot of them aren't memorable LOL so I'm going to start reviewing after most sessions just to refresh my memory.
Saw Lime at KA yesterday, I didn't have a bad time but I'm not sure I'd repeat.
The entire session felt like the most standard kgirl service I've ever had. Everything felt super average except for the fact she was tight.
The listed height is pretty close but I'd still say she's taller, maybe around 5'6 or even 5'7 maybe?
Her face wasn't too bad but she did have thin lips. I'm pretty sure her lips were as thin as a single udon noodle lmao. With me she wasn't very enthusiastic about kissing and was never really proactive in it.
In addition to the fact that her donations are higher than standard (as listed on the site) I'm not really interested in repeating especially while there's a lot of other kgirls at both KA and AP rn.
-
11-12-25 03:13 #5972
Not friendly
1) No. YMMV. Originally Posted by Markro3000
[View Original Post]
2) No. YMMV.
Reply With Quote
