Find Your New Baby
Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
Top Tier Escorts
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Thread: Bareback Providers

+ Add Report
Page 53 of 1813 FirstFirst ... 3 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 103 153 553 1053 ... LastLast
Results 781 to 795 of 27185
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #26405
    Quote Originally Posted by BackInSea  [View Original Post]
    I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.
    Anyone bang her yet? Any reports on? Looks, performance?

  2. #26404
    Quote Originally Posted by MSindon23  [View Original Post]
    Hi all, first post here. I will be coming to the Seattle / Tacoma area soon and looking to see a provider who has a proven satisfaction record where most guys feel like they got their monies worth. I know that each individual has their own preferences and ratings so each his own. But for the "average guy" not looking for a specific fetish or skill set other than not to feel like I've wasted my money. I've narrowed it down to Sweet Miranda and NDCAPrincess. I've read the reviews and did my own comparisons but I wanted reach out to the local community to see what your thoughts are on either one.
    Miranda, is a lock for whatever you want.

  3. #26403

    Menu on other board

    Quote Originally Posted by HelloThar  [View Original Post]
    I swear I've seen ads that straight up imply BB by mentioning something like 'VIP if you have recent test results' by longtime providers. Something less ambiguous than just VIP, but less explicit than all holes open, LOL. I know most of removing certain wordage is to avoid legality issues.

    Just wish menus could easily be discerned. Providers complain of hobbyists wasting their time asking questions about menu, but that's because they get your money either way while you're trying to figure out if she's worth it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Vadger  [View Original Post]
    Agreed. It seems to be a Seattle area thing. I feel like every other city, providers are open about theu menu, as it leads to less frustration / misunderstanding later on. Much less time wasted. Almost every traveling provider's website is quite clear about their menu.

    Now, TNA is great because there are a lot of providers on it, and even if the reviews are BS, we can reach out to the reviewers to discuss. But, this is a lengthy process and only works if you're planning ahead. If you are looking to hookup same day, it's so difficult to understand a provider's menu. TNA is useless for that.
    It is a WA thing. But I had similar experiences on a private MI board as well (it does not exist anymore) . It was only after making a network with other members that you got more direct information about BB. Having said that. In MI the costs are a lot lower and 99% of the women are BB friendly if you just come across as a decent person who treats them with respect. I do pretty well here in WA as well with that same strategy. Treat people well (not necessarily financially) and they reciprocate.

  4. #26402
    Quote Originally Posted by Darce  [View Original Post]
    $400 hh.

    $600 hour.
    I'd pay 6 for more time where I'd have a better chance of firing off a second round, 6 for an hour is a pass.

  5. #26401
    Senior Member


    Posts: 244
    Quote Originally Posted by MorganCreamin  [View Original Post]
    Guessing dolcesempre from the other site, heavily discussed here over the years. Never seen her myself.

    What was the rate? She might be worth a visit if reasonable
    $400 hh.

    $600 hour.

  6. #26400
    Quote Originally Posted by Markro3000  [View Original Post]
    Dolce who? You found her where?
    Guessing dolcesempre from the other site, heavily discussed here over the years. Never seen her myself.

    What was the rate? She might be worth a visit if reasonable

  7. #26399
    Quote Originally Posted by Darce  [View Original Post]
    First time meeting her.

    Filled her up, no mention of a condom.
    Dolce who? You found her where?

  8. #26398
    Senior Member


    Posts: 244

    Dolce

    First time meeting her.

    Filled her up, no mention of a condom.

  9. #26397
    Quote Originally Posted by Vadger  [View Original Post]
    Agreed. It seems to be a Seattle area thing. I feel like every other city, providers are open about theu menu, as it leads to less frustration / misunderstanding later on. Much less time wasted. Almost every traveling provider's website is quite clear about their menu.

    Now, TNA is great because there are a lot of providers on it, and even if the reviews are BS, we can reach out to the reviewers to discuss. But, this is a lengthy process and only works if you're planning ahead. If you are looking to hookup same day, it's so difficult to understand a provider's menu. TNA is useless for that.
    It wouldn't be so bad if reviewers gave more info directly in their posts too instead of PM'ing.

    Give some damn alphabet soups or say if she's GFE at the very least. Wish I could block every hobbyist who says she's great and now my atf and nothing else. And agreed, it's a pretty garbage system we have here.

  10. #26396

    Help Me Choose Provider

    Hello fellow believers. First time posting here. I am visiting the area soon and have looked at all the providers in the Seattle / Tacoma area. Based on my taste and the reviews I have narrowed it down to Sweet Miranda and ndcaPrincess. Has anyone on here been with both? If so, would you say one would be better than the other and why? Thanks in advance.

  11. #26395

    Visting soon. Which provider?

    Hi all, first post here. I will be coming to the Seattle / Tacoma area soon and looking to see a provider who has a proven satisfaction record where most guys feel like they got their monies worth. I know that each individual has their own preferences and ratings so each his own. But for the "average guy" not looking for a specific fetish or skill set other than not to feel like I've wasted my money. I've narrowed it down to Sweet Miranda and NDCAPrincess. I've read the reviews and did my own comparisons but I wanted reach out to the local community to see what your thoughts are on either one.

  12. #26394
    Quote Originally Posted by HelloThar  [View Original Post]
    Just wish menus could easily be discerned. Providers complain of hobbyists wasting their time asking questions about menu, but that's because they get your money either way while you're trying to figure out if she's worth it.
    Agreed. It seems to be a Seattle area thing. I feel like every other city, providers are open about theu menu, as it leads to less frustration / misunderstanding later on. Much less time wasted. Almost every traveling provider's website is quite clear about their menu.

    Now, TNA is great because there are a lot of providers on it, and even if the reviews are BS, we can reach out to the reviewers to discuss. But, this is a lengthy process and only works if you're planning ahead. If you are looking to hookup same day, it's so difficult to understand a provider's menu. TNA is useless for that.

  13. #26393
    Quote Originally Posted by DrtyHarry  [View Original Post]
    Yeah the pussy cartel revolted - "How dare you provide services that result in a hobbyist being happy. " LOL.

    Jokes aside, a few years ago I posted a review there, where I listed something that related to a service and I remember some mod reaching out requesting me to change wording saying it could be construed as "pay for play" and we would rather you remove that word and I happily did.
    I swear I've seen ads that straight up imply BB by mentioning something like 'VIP if you have recent test results' by longtime providers. Something less ambiguous than just VIP, but less explicit than all holes open, LOL. I know most of removing certain wordage is to avoid legality issues.

    Just wish menus could easily be discerned. Providers complain of hobbyists wasting their time asking questions about menu, but that's because they get your money either way while you're trying to figure out if she's worth it.

  14. #26392
    Quote Originally Posted by BackInSea  [View Original Post]
    I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.
    [QUOTE=Colnago;7404401][QUOTE=BackInSea;7404364]I'm sure a WK probably told her to take the pic down. It was basically a pic with a menu and price breakdown. She had $300/ hr "BB all 3 holes" with rough sex.[/ QUOTE]More likely a moderator. I don't think you post menus anymore.

    [QUOTE=Colnago;7404468]Probably a moderator. I don't think girls can post activities anymore.[ / QUOTE].

    Yeah the pussy cartel revolted - "How dare you provide services that result in a hobbyist being happy. " LOL.

    Jokes aside, a few years ago I posted a review there, where I listed something that related to a service and I remember some mod reaching out requesting me to change wording saying it could be construed as "pay for play" and we would rather you remove that word and I happily did.

  15. #26391
    Quote Originally Posted by Colnago  [View Original Post]
    Probably a moderator. I don't think girls can post activities anymore.
    They need to just let some gals have fun. Always women putting down other women, LOL.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts

Protected by Copyscape