Find Your New Baby
Ava Escorts
Best Escorts
Top Escorts
Top Tier Escorts
click for FREE hookups
This blog is moderated by Punter3
  1. #5790
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy62  [View Original Post]
    Looking for a bit of intel on this one. The menu is extremely extensive with greek. Almost TGTBT. The only feedback I've heard is that she is soso.

    https://get9irl.com/Rumi
    There's reviews for Yeri in SLC. Look up on TER. Ratings seem aggressively low or maybe it's true, not sure. But seems like fake pics.

  2. #5789

    Ollie

    Saw get9 Ollie yesterday, pics were too good to pass up. I'd leave a link but they already removed her because yesterday was her last day. Pics were her face with some P.S. But close resemblance. She was all natural small B cup, with hourglass figure and nice big hips. Her body was perfect for me. Enjoyed my time with her greatly, but bummed that she's leaving already (only a 10 day stay). She said she'll return in 2026 so I'll be on the lookout.

  3. #5788
    Quote Originally Posted by LabiaFedora  [View Original Post]
    Can confirm..."What you seek, is seeking you" - The Breeze At Dawn, Rumi

    ...All aboard Mykonos!
    Thank you good sir If you could do a mini or any more details. Much appreciated.

  4. #5787

    Say more?

    Quote Originally Posted by LabiaFedora  [View Original Post]
    Can confirm..."What you seek, is seeking you" - The Breeze At Dawn, Rumi

    ...All aboard Mykonos!
    This is all "Greek" to me LOL. Can you say more? Did you end up seeing her? PLEASER review?

  5. #5786
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy62  [View Original Post]
    Looking for a bit of intel on this one. The menu is extremely extensive with greek. Almost TGTBT. The only feedback I've heard is that she is soso.

    https://get9irl.com/Rumi
    Can confirm..."What you seek, is seeking you" - The Breeze At Dawn, Rumi

    ...All aboard Mykonos!

  6. #5785

    Rumi

    Looking for a bit of intel on this one. The menu is extremely extensive with greek. Almost TGTBT. The only feedback I've heard is that she is soso.

    https://get9irl.com/Rumi

  7. #5784

    Ms Nine


  8. #5783
    Quote Originally Posted by Madamenhu  [View Original Post]
    I noticed someone copied my review from the PLEASER Reviews thread and pasted it on TER: jimb12345678900 for Kasey (402766).

    I guess he just wanted the free 2 week VIP membership, although it should be easy enough to make something up given the low quality of reviews that pass mustard on that site. And this brings me to the main point, which is that reviewers should provide more useful information. These reviews are not supposed to be a LiveJournal about you getting your jollies off. We want to know if the girl is someone we might be interested in seeing. Most of these reviewers don't even give a description of the girl's looks, but will often describe their own penis. You have to sift through 90% junk reviews to find something informative.

    The TER reviews are broken into 2 sections. The General Details section should ideally include a brief rundown of looks (face, body, T&A, height, hair, anything else notable) and basically whether or not the service was good. This will save people a lot of time rather than having to read through the whole Juicy Details section to (maybe) see if the girl sounds attractive. Again, they usually don't even have this info.

    The person who copied my review used the Attitude section of my PLEASER review for the General Details: "She's a pleaser and a sweetheart. I felt good about her right away. VIPs read on. " Yeah, not helpful at all. And don't say "VIPs read on. " WE KNOW THAT! It is incredibly lame to write that, especially coming from someone who steals reviews, and probably does not even see kgirls at all. Ironically it was the only part he wrote himself.

    Sorry about the rant, but it's also a PSA.
    Agreed. Some of us write the reviews as a hobby since we enjoy reflecting on the experience, be it good or bad, and highlighting why and going to detail is the main idea. You can tell when someone's cutting corners, it's too easy.

    I was under the impression that previously posted reviews get filtered, and perhaps even give the reviewer a warning at times. I guess not.

  9. #5782
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy62  [View Original Post]
    I'm only seeing her ad in the OC section of Get9 but yes the pics are newer. Same Kona that looks over her shoulder at you during doggy.
    Thanks. I swear when I left this, she was in LA but I see her in OC now and yeah I recognize her from 1 of the pictures now. Her eyes are what really made her memorable for me.

  10. #5781
    Quote Originally Posted by Randy62  [View Original Post]
    Dude this made me laugh. Its sad actually and yes I totally agree these reviews need to be less like a penthouse forum post. Theres one guy that writes about his black 9" on every review. Sometimes its good entertainment until they get the girls cup size wrong ie rating a B cup a double DD is my pet peeve.
    It's gross because it's obviously a sexual fetish for them & they're probably jerking it while they type the review with one hand. And on top of that they don't provide useful information because they couldn't care less. They might not have even seen the girl, because why bother when you're just trying to flash other dudes in text form.

  11. #5780
    Quote Originally Posted by Madamenhu  [View Original Post]
    I noticed someone copied my review from the PLEASER Reviews thread and pasted it on TER: jimb12345678900 for Kasey (402766).

    I guess he just wanted the free 2 week VIP membership, although it should be easy enough to make something up given the low quality of reviews that pass mustard on that site. And this brings me to the main point, which is that reviewers should provide more useful information. These reviews are not supposed to be a LiveJournal about you getting your jollies off. We want to know if the girl is someone we might be interested in seeing. Most of these reviewers don't even give a description of the girl's looks, but will often describe their own penis. You have to sift through 90% junk reviews to find something informative.

    The TER reviews are broken into 2 sections. The General Details section should ideally include a brief rundown of looks (face, body, T&A, height, hair, anything else notable) and basically whether or not the service was good. This will save people a lot of time rather than having to read through the whole Juicy Details section to (maybe) see if the girl sounds attractive. Again, they usually don't even have this info.

    The person who copied my review used the Attitude section of my PLEASER review for the General Details: "She's a pleaser and a sweetheart. I felt good about her right away. VIPs read on. " Yeah, not helpful at all. And don't say "VIPs read on. " WE KNOW THAT! It is incredibly lame to write that, especially coming from someone who steals reviews, and probably does not even see kgirls at all. Ironically it was the only part he wrote himself.

    Sorry about the rant, but it's also a PSA.
    Dude this made me laugh. Its sad actually and yes I totally agree these reviews need to be less like a penthouse forum post. Theres one guy that writes about his black 9" on every review. Sometimes its good entertainment until they get the girls cup size wrong ie rating a B cup a double DD is my pet peeve.

  12. #5779
    Quote Originally Posted by TheVistMan  [View Original Post]
    For Get9irl, does anyone know if the Kona currently in LA is the same Kona that was here in OC? Pics are not her and she used real pics when in OC so I am unsure.

    Thanks.
    I'm only seeing her ad in the OC section of Get9 but yes the pics are newer. Same Kona that looks over her shoulder at you during doggy.

  13. #5778

    Kona

    For Get9irl, does anyone know if the Kona currently in LA is the same Kona that was here in OC? Pics are not her and she used real pics when in OC so I am unsure.

    Thanks.

  14. #5777
    There are a ton of booker fake reviews on TER and even here. Looks like they just cut and pasted to make it easier for them to write something. You can always tell fake booker reviews because they give like zero detail on the girl. They use generic terms to try to appeal to the broadest audience.

    Quote Originally Posted by Madamenhu  [View Original Post]
    I noticed someone copied my review from the PLEASER Reviews thread and pasted it on TER: jimb12345678900 for Kasey (402766).

    I guess he just wanted the free 2 week VIP membership, although it should be easy enough to make something up given the low quality of reviews that pass mustard on that site. And this brings me to the main point, which is that reviewers should provide more useful information. These reviews are not supposed to be a LiveJournal about you getting your jollies off. We want to know if the girl is someone we might be interested in seeing. Most of these reviewers don't even give a description of the girl's looks, but will often describe their own penis. You have to sift through 90% junk reviews to find something informative.

    The TER reviews are broken into 2 sections. The General Details section should ideally include a brief rundown of looks (face, body, T&A, height, hair, anything else notable) and basically whether or not the service was good. This will save people a lot of time rather than having to read through the whole Juicy Details section to (maybe) see if the girl sounds attractive. Again, they usually don't even have this info.

    The person who copied my review used the Attitude section of my PLEASER review for the General Details: "She's a pleaser and a sweetheart. I felt good about her right away. VIPs read on. " Yeah, not helpful at all. And don't say "VIPs read on. " WE KNOW THAT! It is incredibly lame to write that, especially coming from someone who steals reviews, and probably does not even see kgirls at all. Ironically it was the only part he wrote himself.

    Sorry about the rant, but it's also a PSA.

  15. #5776

    TER: Stolen Reviews, Lame Reviews

    I noticed someone copied my review from the PLEASER Reviews thread and pasted it on TER: jimb12345678900 for Kasey (402766).

    I guess he just wanted the free 2 week VIP membership, although it should be easy enough to make something up given the low quality of reviews that pass mustard on that site. And this brings me to the main point, which is that reviewers should provide more useful information. These reviews are not supposed to be a LiveJournal about you getting your jollies off. We want to know if the girl is someone we might be interested in seeing. Most of these reviewers don't even give a description of the girl's looks, but will often describe their own penis. You have to sift through 90% junk reviews to find something informative.

    The TER reviews are broken into 2 sections. The General Details section should ideally include a brief rundown of looks (face, body, T&A, height, hair, anything else notable) and basically whether or not the service was good. This will save people a lot of time rather than having to read through the whole Juicy Details section to (maybe) see if the girl sounds attractive. Again, they usually don't even have this info.

    The person who copied my review used the Attitude section of my PLEASER review for the General Details: "She's a pleaser and a sweetheart. I felt good about her right away. VIPs read on. " Yeah, not helpful at all. And don't say "VIPs read on. " WE KNOW THAT! It is incredibly lame to write that, especially coming from someone who steals reviews, and probably does not even see kgirls at all. Ironically it was the only part he wrote himself.

    Sorry about the rant, but it's also a PSA.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Meet Sugar Babies
click for FREE hookups
Sex Vacation
Mix and Match Combo Pack Viagra 100mg Generic Cialis (Vidalista 20 mg) USA to USA Only Mvitra 20 mg (Generic Levitra or vardenafil 20 mg pills)

Protected by Copyscape