OPSEC. Operattional Security

**CollegeParkBoy** · 09-04-25 21:26

Originally Posted by WillGuyMar [View Original Post]

More ladies on the low-end are requiring FaceTime (or the Android equivalent) verification. Sometimes they're up front and post it in the ad, but others will spring it on you during the set up. Unless you have a safe burner that is not tied to your name then this is dangerous as it requires you to give out your real number.

I offer to send a "live pic" where I can put on a hat and sunglasses. That worked once. Or use snapchat.

I understand the high-end ladies doing this, but for the Landmark Latinas this is a bit much.

I've done it three times with LC ads. All three were legit. Though I only saw two of them. The third I didn't see was shady with the texting of the apt # and a dude came out her spot before I got out. She then came out mad at me for asking who he was and I decided to leave. It was the girl in the ad though.

I didn't think it would be that bad as you see the actual person real time but now that I think of it they could screenshot you (I know iPhone notifies you if someone screenshots during FT). Guess I'll stop now LOL.

**GoRedSkins** · 09-02-25 13:55

Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but here goes.

Visited an AMP that I have been to many times. About 10-20 minutes into massage, there's subtle knocking on the door which is unusual, then girls phone beeps signaling text received. After reading the text, she flips out, puts her robe back on, and tells me to hop up and get dressed. Confused, I ask her why. "Police" she says. I toss on my shorts and lay back face down. She covers me with a towel and continues massaging though I can tell she's nervous. In the distance I hear radio chatter that could be PD or FD communications. Eventually she leaves the room and says to stay here. After about 10 minutes she says they're leaving, then asks if I want extras LOL. I decline, and nervously GTFO, but noticed no PD or anything out of the ordinary outside. From her broken English all I could understand is that something happened, and they popped in to ask a couple of questions, then left. It definitely spooked the mamasan and employees.

Not sure what I would've done if cops came in and asked me questions. I feel like they were just caught in the crossfire of unrelated PD activity and there's nothing to worry about. However, should I avoid this place for a while in case they might have popped up on the radar of the PD?

**MrWorldWid3** · 08-06-25 14:27

Originally Posted by WillGuyMar [View Original Post]

More ladies on the low-end are requiring FaceTime (or the Android equivalent) verification. Sometimes they're up front and post it in the ad, but others will spring it on you during the set up. Unless you have a safe burner that is not tied to your name then this is dangerous as it requires you to give out your real number.

I offer to send a "live pic" where I can put on a hat and sunglasses. That worked once. Or use snapchat.

I understand the high-end ladies doing this, but for the Landmark Latinas this is a bit much.

Yeah, fuck that for any girl off listcrawler or bedpage. If I do a real PII verification, it's usually independents with a history on TER to vouch for their legitimacy. Shout out to all the guys who went in walking blind so the rest of us could run.

**FarFarAway** · 07-11-25 14:29

Originally Posted by Mandane [View Original Post]

I haven't got a result with Tineye in years. Try Yandex image search. It works occasionally.

The way it worked for me, it was almost like facial rec. It showed a lot of similar photos.

**Mandane** · 07-08-25 19:02

Originally Posted by CollegeParkBoy [View Original Post]

Have you tried Tineye?

I haven't got a result with Tineye in years. Try Yandex image search. It works occasionally.

**WillGuyMar** · 07-08-25 06:45

More ladies on the low-end are requiring FaceTime (or the Android equivalent) verification. Sometimes they're up front and post it in the ad, but others will spring it on you during the set up. Unless you have a safe burner that is not tied to your name then this is dangerous as it requires you to give out your real number.

I offer to send a "live pic" where I can put on a hat and sunglasses. That worked once. Or use snapchat.

I understand the high-end ladies doing this, but for the Landmark Latinas this is a bit much.

**CollegeParkBoy** · 07-03-25 21:03

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

I have a photo of a POT that facecheck traces to an Instagram account. I can't locate the actual account however. And I won't pay facecheck's exorbitant fee. I could provide the photo to anyone who can help me out to get to that Instagram. This sugar baby POT is a ballet dancer, I'm supposed to FC w / her tomorrow.

Also, let's revive this thread.

Have you tried Tineye?

**FarFarAway** · 07-03-25 15:42

I have solid practices, and mostly haven't had any trouble. I am in a large west coast metro area, and have figured the big population provides me some safety. There are just a large amount of people here, most who have nothing to do w / the dating sites I am on. However, I had two recent incidents that gave me that 'OMG' feeling. I need to be UTR, as I have a SO.

I was meeting a POT for coffee, a M&G. She unfortunately is very striking and was dressed very provocatively, tight short dress, big boobs on display. We take a seat at an outside table, I look across the plaza, and there is a couple from my development. Good friends, but thankfully engaged w / a number of other people. Maybe they didn't see us. I explained to the gal, and after a discreet amount of time, I exited a different route so I didn't have to walk past them.

Even weirder. I was going to a hotel to meet a sugar baby, who had booked a room. I am about to walk in the front door, and a woman was coming out who 'reminded' me of the wife of my spouse's uncle. However, they live on the east coast. Then, someone very much like the uncle walks out. I just keep on walking and go around the corner of the building so they can't see me. I hunker down and wait a long time for them to disperse. I later hear through the family grapevine that these actual people were in the state at that time. I have no idea why there were in my area, and it was the absolute worst luck that they happened to not only be in the same hotel as my SB, but the timing was such that we bumped into one another. One possibility why this 'bump' hasn't been mentioned. The uncle was known to step out on occasion, perhaps it wasn't his wife.

**FarFarAway** · 07-03-25 15:30

Originally Posted by BuckshotWatson [View Original Post]

Have you tried https://www.duplichecker.com/reverse-image-search.php?.

I did. But that site isn't free. It would be ideal to find something free or cheap. I was hoping someone might volunteer who had access.

**BuckshotWatson** · 07-03-25 09:59

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

I have a photo of a POT that facecheck traces to an Instagram account. I can't locate the actual account however. And I won't pay facecheck's exorbitant fee. I could provide the photo to anyone who can help me out to get to that Instagram. This sugar baby POT is a ballet dancer, I'm supposed to FC w / her tomorrow.

Also, let's revive this thread.

Have you tried https://www.duplichecker.com/reverse-image-search.php?.

**FarFarAway** · 06-30-25 19:10

I have a photo of a POT that facecheck traces to an Instagram account. I can't locate the actual account however. And I won't pay facecheck's exorbitant fee. I could provide the photo to anyone who can help me out to get to that Instagram. This sugar baby POT is a ballet dancer, I'm supposed to FC w / her tomorrow.

Also, let's revive this thread.

**Gourmand56** · 03-10-25 06:08

Originally Posted by FarFarAway [View Original Post]

A MAC address. These can be spoofed. I have a little piece of software that does it on my mac.

Tails is another option.

https://tails.net/

**JackRyan1** · 03-09-25 09:50

There is a very popular notel in the west end of Tyson's across from my favorite 911 car dealer.

This hotel is getting very run down, looks bad. Rooms are dirty and outdated.

First off. Saw Karen there from ff, go into the room and the maid is cleaning the room, I'm like WTF? She translates it's ok and tips the maid.

So much for discretion.

Saw civi, room confusion, trash blowing around, I see condom boxes swirling in the wind outside the room.

Call me old fashioned but I prefer the illusion of discretion.

That location is overused, situational awareness at all times, head on a swivel.

**FarFarAway** · 02-26-25 19:09

Originally Posted by Proflou2019 [View Original Post]

Not how it works. Every physical device that connects to a WiFi has a unique hardware descriptor. I guarantee you in these managed systems like hotels use, EVERY device that connects is logged, and where you go while connected is tracked.

Same with the WiFi at Mickey D's, Starbucks, the mall, whatever.

Lou.

A MAC address. These can be spoofed. I have a little piece of software that does it on my mac.

**JmSuttr** · 02-24-25 23:32

T-Mobile, AT&T, Verizon, and a host of other mobile providers (Metro PCS, etc.) offer 5 G internet gateways designed to be used as your primary home internet service. They all have SIM cards and connect via the mobile network. My unit is small enough that it fits in a carry-on and I've traveled with it on multiple occasions. I've seen articles claiming that, once they're activated at your home address, they're geographically restricted. Can't speak for others but mine has worked perfectly all across the country. I plug in the unit and have a much faster connection than the hotel Wi-fi and it completely bypasses the hotel's network, equipment, and logs.

Additionally, I always use a VPN whenever I do anything online. I know nothing is 100% secure, but at least I've cut the hotel completely out of the loop.