Escort Reports

**MrLimpBiscuit** · 06-24-25 12:01

Originally Posted by WaltK [View Original Post]

She's real, the pics are real, she's hot, has a great body, her communications were excellent and she's expensive. Friends with Chanel from Holland but is in GR. I will repeat.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/grand...y/538331907415

4 bills, not till I shit gold nuggets, aint no snatch worth that, LOL jk, to each is own. LOL.

**Burner14** · 06-24-25 11:14

Originally Posted by NickBeam [View Original Post]

See if yours were there.

https://michigan.arrests.org/Kent/?c...e=1&results=56

Mine was recently released was in there for like 2 weeks on different charges. Meeting her today on the cheap now that she's really strapped for cash! Her loss my gain!

**Jrdyn22** · 06-24-25 09:53

Originally Posted by Anonwmlatam [View Original Post]

Anyone else notice lots of new posts with 313 numbers with pics of higher than average looks?

Also I've been meaning to post or ask but can we agree on a scale for what we use to compare providers? I've heard some people describe some providers here in a way that I would never come close to describing them. Not going to say they're ugly or unattractive, just it's not for me. I just want an accurate representation that when someone says gorgeous or hot that it might be accurate like saying someone looks like 90's Pam Anderson, and she ends up looking being a clone of Sydney Sweeney. Like that's close enough to be accurate. Instead what I see is, wow she's hot (like Sydney Sweeney) and what they actually look like is the voice actress Kristen Schaal. You know? Not ugly just not at all accurate.

Drop comments on either topic for discussion.

I have always thought the same thing. Being new'ish to this I struggled early on with reviews being accurate. We probably can't really review based on look / taste because that is too subjective and we all have different opinions. I have visited many that were given rave reviews on looks and I was not in agreeance! My suggestion for a standard review scale:

1. Is the add real or not. (suspect LEO?

2. Are the pictures accurate? Some providers don't use real pictures for safety and privacy concerns (I think that should be obviously stated in the ads but that will never happen). Some providers use older pics. Some providers use pics that are not AS good as they are in real life.

3. Communications! This is a big one. How reliable are the providers? Do they respond timely? Do they schedule and ghost? Do they respond at all?

4. Donation $.

5. Service's provided. (GFE? PSE? BBBJ vs. CBJ etc.).

6. NAME & NUMBER changes. I feel this one has been increasing lately. A lot of providers are changing their names. Can we attempt to identify the providers name and any previous names so that readers can do proper research. Can we post their numbers here?

Looking forward to some senior vets chiming in on this since they provide the majority of the information on here.

**BeanLicker** · 06-24-25 08:09

I have my doubts this Latina is actually willing to fuck someone for $350 but god damn if she does sign me up. I noticed her ad has no phone number it seems like she is harvesting OF subscribers only. If one of you is lucky enough to bang this I'm jealous LOL.

https://tryst.link/escort/sofiatoy

**JustKreepin** · 06-23-25 17:53

Originally Posted by Anonwmlatam [View Original Post]

Anyone else notice lots of new posts with 313 numbers with pics of higher than average looks?

Also I've been meaning to post or ask but can we agree on a scale for what we use to compare providers? I've heard some people describe some providers here in a way that I would never come close to describing them. Not going to say they're ugly or unattractive, just it's not for me. I just want an accurate representation that when someone says gorgeous or hot that it might be accurate like saying someone looks like 90's Pam Anderson, and she ends up looking being a clone of Sydney Sweeney. Like that's close enough to be accurate. Instead what I see is, wow she's hot (like Sydney Sweeney) and what they actually look like is the voice actress Kristen Schaal. You know? Not ugly just not at all accurate.

Drop comments on either topic for discussion.

The sudden influx of more attractive than normal 313 adds I find to be very curious as well. Especially when they aren't giving any obvious signs they aren't uncle LEO affiliated. Without confirmation that's a hard pass for me.

As to a scale. Everyone's taste varies so that may take a considerable effort to make happen, but it's not a bad idea.

Be safe. JK.

**PimpDaddy83** · 06-23-25 17:53

Passing through on a fishing trip, around, Grand Haven area. Is there anything reliable up here, the fish isn't the only thing I'm looking for, I can definitely provide some reliable talent in the ohio area if possible, cinc dyt. As always I'll be doing my homework, if anybody can point me in the right direction, cheers pms are open willing to travel twenty thirty minutes.

A.

**Anonwmlatam** · 06-23-25 17:06

Anyone else notice lots of new posts with 313 numbers with pics of higher than average looks?

Also I've been meaning to post or ask but can we agree on a scale for what we use to compare providers? I've heard some people describe some providers here in a way that I would never come close to describing them. Not going to say they're ugly or unattractive, just it's not for me. I just want an accurate representation that when someone says gorgeous or hot that it might be accurate like saying someone looks like 90's Pam Anderson, and she ends up looking being a clone of Sydney Sweeney. Like that's close enough to be accurate. Instead what I see is, wow she's hot (like Sydney Sweeney) and what they actually look like is the voice actress Kristen Schaal. You know? Not ugly just not at all accurate.

Drop comments on either topic for discussion.

**Star1967** · 06-23-25 16:40

I was about to text her for an appointment but got kinda nervous she may be sponsored by Uncle LEO. Likely just me being a little paranoid. If anyone partakes, please share.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/grand...d/032428357965

**BudMan455** · 06-23-25 15:56

Woah. Just woah. These girls have some of these nicest asses I've seen from a provider.

First experience in a very long time was Trouble, and she is exactly that. Ass is FAT, smells good clean hotel Incall. $.5 SS but ended up being longer. She assumed k9 instantly, trying to make it quick. She ended up liking it just as much as me so we went for a few rounds. Probably my favorite so far. Definitely repeat.

Next was Jessica seen her today for ss Incall private location clean we were sweating afterwards tho due to her apt being upstairs. I'm bigger than she likes but we made it work. Best slow CBJ I've ever had. Made me pop almost instantly, we laughed and she continued to suck my soul. No deepthroat tho. K9 bag popped she put another on with her mouth and away we went again. Definitely a caring provider. Will repeat. Ss $.4.

**WaltK** · 06-23-25 14:25

She's real, the pics are real, she's hot, has a great body, her communications were excellent and she's expensive. Friends with Chanel from Holland but is in GR. I will repeat.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/grand...y/538331907415

**TinFling0429** · 06-22-25 11:50

Originally Posted by Masw980 [View Original Post]

Hi, I'm not taking sides here but, you're not alone. But we need to understand her situations and life happens you know! She informed me two days ago that she have had chaotic week, if we be patient with her she will definitely get back to us. She is definitely worth the wait and trust me, I think you know, that she will make it up for you. Be patient my friend.

Mo out!

I know Dallas decently well, and had great appointments with her before, but her chaos is self inflicted and this is her MO. I don't think she has ill intent, but she inflicts her own chaos and then gets wrapped in it and then people are collateral damage of it so to speak. It is selfish and like others have said, these girls have all the excuses or shortcuts in the world until they are desperate or need something and don't have an ultimatum, and only then might you not get bent over a barrel or treated like your time doesn't matter. Like I said I like her and think she is a great date and want her to do well, but making excuses for people we like is part of the problem and without accountability, we suffer.

**BTrucker1964** · 06-22-25 11:19

Originally Posted by Bottum [View Original Post]

I've seen Lainey 2 months ago in Holland and recently rodeoed Sweet Pea in the infamous Muskegon motel by Meijer. Both providers have open menus and above average service. Lainey has not posted in the Holland STG for several months. Lainey has reunited with her A A husband and hobbies occasionally in Holland but her children lives out of town else where. Her BBBJ is still top notch and is adepts sexually to satisfy all your whims. Be advised her last STG pics did not reflect her BBW weight gain. Sweet pea has a smaller body dresses ostentatiously with flamboyant wigs and is equally adept at drawing your baby batter. Her latest phone does not start with 616 "377" but a northern 231 number. Sweet pea's STG ad are purposely obscure / dark and does not show face or much nudity. Her pics are not spectacular but her services list that she enjoys reflects her actual porn star activities. Both providers have reasonable donations for their satisfying open minded services they provide. Lainey if she returns and Sweet pea are both deserving of my recommendation and continued daliances. Bottum out.

Good to know that about Lainey, I'm not into bbw's. I have to agree on Sweetpea. She actually text me last night while I was busy and promptly returned my text this morning. I am unfortunately not in that part of the state other than for work which limits when I can see her. I am looking forward to seeing her again.

**Bottum** · 06-22-25 00:36

Originally Posted by BTrucker1964 [View Original Post]

Sweetpea is definitely not Lainey, I have seen Lainey a couple years ago. She actually looks really good in those pics in that link, I may have to try her again. She is also not Tina or Asia. I don't know if she's using a text app or not, but they do recycle numbers often.

I've seen Lainey 2 months ago in Holland and recently rodeoed Sweet Pea in the infamous Muskegon motel by Meijer. Both providers have open menus and above average service. Lainey has not posted in the Holland STG for several months. Lainey has reunited with her A A husband and hobbies occasionally in Holland but her children lives out of town else where. Her BBBJ is still top notch and is adepts sexually to satisfy all your whims. Be advised her last STG pics did not reflect her BBW weight gain. Sweet pea has a smaller body dresses ostentatiously with flamboyant wigs and is equally adept at drawing your baby batter. Her latest phone does not start with 616 "377" but a northern 231 number. Sweet pea's STG ad are purposely obscure / dark and does not show face or much nudity. Her pics are not spectacular but her services list that she enjoys reflects her actual porn star activities. Both providers have reasonable donations for their satisfying open minded services they provide. Lainey if she returns and Sweet pea are both deserving of my recommendation and continued daliances. Bottum out.

**NickBeam** · 06-20-25 20:54

See if yours were there.

https://michigan.arrests.org/Kent/?c...e=1&results=56

**Cassidy69** · 06-19-25 11:51

Originally Posted by ChanceTa [View Original Post]

Hello gents, well I had another lovely visit last week with the gracious and gorgeous CJ.

Comms, 10/10.

Location 10/10.

Looks and Attitude 20/10.

She makes it seamless and fun. Every time.

Now that I'm writing this, I think I need to text her again.

Thanks so much hun!