General Reports

[DarkClouds]

Ah so it was a DOS attack. How did you find out? Edit: Never mind, I see the login issues forum now.

I just tested, and I did experience some issues, but I changed the servers I was connected to and eventually had no issues. CAPTCHA does flag IP addresses associated with questionable activity, and I would guess that whoever was conducting the DOS attack was likely using a VPN. I'll take this tradeoff of a CAPTCHA, if it saves us from the site being unavailable.

[I On Da Street]

I'll test it out a little later today, I'm catching up on things while I have access for now.

I just tested, and I did experience some issues, but I changed the servers I was connected to and eventually had no issues. CAPTCHA does flag IP addresses associated with questionable activity, and I would guess that whoever was conducting the DOS attack was likely using a VPN. I'll take this tradeoff of a CAPTCHA, if it saves us from the site being unavailable.

[I On Da Street]

I'm just having to check the box on the annoying CAPTCHA thing.

I'll test it out a little later today, I'm catching up on things while I have access for now.

[DarkClouds]

I'm just having to check the box on the annoying CAPTCHA thing.

Anybody else use a VPN and getting access denied and having to disconnect the VPN to access this site now?

[HighFive99]

Anybody else use a VPN and getting access denied and having to disconnect the VPN to access this site now?

[AceOfMatt]

Clickforporn.com and thothub. VIP.

Google these sites if you want to see a site that's very similar to PH. Only difference is most of these ladies who get famous by doing silly Insta or YT vids, ya mostly won't find their leaked OF vids on the Hub. These sites are specifically for those leaked Creator creatures, who became famous enough to get leaked. Ones like that Bronwin Aurora and Dainty Wilder are on there. Amongst other's as well. Someone showed me these sites last year and I bet people out here heard of these.

[Choir Boy]

Other users have heard from site admin that they are under a server attack from China and working on a new firewall. I find that when I get the error message, I click on the main page and keep going back and try again about 10 to 12 times until the site loads. I see no updated comments lately too.
ps: Once I get in the site, the error page requires one back page and then it connects

It looks like a new firewall has been implemented. You have to check a box to proceed to the log-in. What I have found is that some computer \ browser combinations show the check box, and some don't.

[ThizzleHats]

Weird, I would've thought China would want to encourage this behavior from us Americans.

Could be lot of reasons. Maybe they don't want us to verify providers and just want us to pick from the grab bag of craigslist / adultsearch / whatever ads with wildly false images.

[DougF]

Other users have heard from site admin that they are under a server attack from China and working on a new firewall. I find that when I get the error message, I click on the main page and keep going back and try again about 10 to 12 times until the site loads. I see no updated comments lately too.
ps: Once I get in the site, the error page requires one back page and then it connects

Weird, I would've thought China would want to encourage this behavior from us Americans.

[Marvelous10]

Yup wasn't working at all for me last night. Refreshing seems to work sometimes for me today.

Other users have heard from site admin that they are under a server attack from China and working on a new firewall. I find that when I get the error message, I click on the main page and keep going back and try again about 10 to 12 times until the site loads. I see no updated comments lately too.
ps: Once I get in the site, the error page requires one back page and then it connects

[DougF]

Is anyone else having issues with the site? Every time I try to login or open a thread link it keeps telling me the site it is doing its daily back up and is down.

Yup wasn't working at all for me last night. Refreshing seems to work sometimes for me today.

[JMan98]

Is anyone else having issues with the site? Every time I try to login or open a thread link it keeps telling me the site it is doing its daily back up and is down.

[Vagrazer]

Was wondering if there's a reason that post ops or TS escorts are not allowed for reviews? Seems that's when greek is readily available, and sometimes great fun. I've had some great sex with a post op. Malana, Gigi and Barbara.

Because they are still men. No matter what a surgeon has done with a knife, DNA doesn't lie.

[Todas]

Was wondering if there's a reason that post ops or TS escorts are not allowed for reviews? Seems that's when greek is readily available, and sometimes great fun. I've had some great sex with a post op. Malana, Gigi and Barbara.

[JmSuttr]

I hadn't checked this sub-forum for a while, but I received a PM alerting me to this latest development. From the article, it seems like the defense attorney in question has decided to play hardball, which isn't surprising to me.

A good defense attorney cares only about getting the best outcome for their client. Moral and ethical questions are often (usually?) of secondary importance as long as the bounds of legality are observed. Unless I've missed it, the prosecution's methodology and criteria for determining who to prosecute has not been fully disclosed. That's one important thing the defense attorney is after, IMO. Client names are certainly in play, but a key issue has to do with who was selected for prosecution, and why. There's also a shitload of other stuff being requested, although we don't have all the specifics.

From the defense perspective, there's nothing to lose. It's up to a judge to rule on the request and, if denied, it should provide a basis for an appeal. If granted, the prosecution has to decide whether it's worth revealing "how the sausage was made" and whether that risks a challenge from multiple defendants. Also, by requesting witness statements, that sends a signal that agency girls could be compelled to testify at trial. Not sure how far down that particular path (and others) the prosecution will be willing to go.

FWIW, if the clients hadn't been publicly "named and shamed," I bet they would've all agreed to a quiet plea deal to get things over with. Once they were outed, it's my sense they figure they have little to lose, and more to gain, by fighting the charges.

Interesting developments!

P.S. From what I know about how federal proceedings went against the agency owners, it was pretty much a classic money laundering case. Easily proved with records and minimal need for potentially problematic witnesses. No muss, no fuss!