Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 901 to 915 of 10941
-
05-22-25 15:43 #10041Senior Member

Posts: 173There definitely seems to be an ebb and flow to the providers and spas in the SGV area. So then you go and read the OC or LA forums and they're just popping with multiple spas and girls are that are great and you're just feeling a bit envious.
Originally Posted by TommyCool
[View Original Post]
But it's worse when it's only a few guys willing to TOFTT. Makes a lot more sense if more guys share and wiling to try new places and report back on their experiences so we know where to avoid so we're not throwing money down the toilet.
Which spas did you hit up that were a waste of money?
Hopefully things turn around soon.
-
05-22-25 15:09 #10040Senior Member

Posts: 152Disappointed with the recent lineup
It was one of those weeks were I just needed to keep finding girls to fuck. Wasted a lot of money at the AMPs around Covina. Have to say most of those places where just a smash and go. Barely to any massage, basic BJ and many wanted cover on BJ. Average looking girls, but many older. We're did all the good providers go. They they all go back to their motherland? I miss Ruby Spa. I always get a decent massage, teasing, and all the fun GFE session. I think I'm done throwing money looking for new place. None worth reporting about LOL.
-
05-21-25 11:06 #10039Senior Member

Posts: 453I was there a couple weeks ago and stopped in. Asked her if she'd be willing to do a shorter session for $100 since that's all I had and she obliged. Was in and out in like 20 min, which was a great deal. I generally tend to not have very prolonged visits, so this strategy worked out well for me. The houses I frequent all have $100 specials and I usually get 20 min or sometimes a little longer.
Originally Posted by Jrp21
[View Original Post]
-
05-21-25 01:06 #10038Senior Member

Posts: 455I just tried Victoria again today.
Originally Posted by JimmyJohns21
[View Original Post]
It wasn't as good as the first time. This session was really rushed. Idk if she was expecting another customer or they got confused and didn't know I was the customer who text to make an appointment. So maybe she was trying to finish me fast thinking someone else was on the way. Also, just like Tina, she didn't want to give me My change since I paid with 60.
Yes, Lola told me she's back next month. I'll wait for her haha.
-
05-20-25 23:34 #10037Senior Member

Posts: 117Tokyo
Asked for lineup tomorrow and got Victoria, Tina, Anna. I have seen Victoria, Tina has mixed reviews. Anyone try Anna? I asked about Lola they say she will be back next month.
-
05-20-25 23:27 #10036Senior Member

Posts: 117Tokyo
Asked for lineup tomorrow and got Victoria, Tina, Anna. I have seen Victoria, Tina has mixed reviews. Anyone try Anna?
-
05-20-25 21:10 #10035Senior Member

Posts: 223Yep
I totally remember that! I think Jrp21 sobered people up and said what... ?
Originally Posted by PhoKingAwesome
[View Original Post]
But as I recall those prior reviews were mostly value judgements, not objective descriptions. One person's "hot" or "amazing" is not a description, and I simply take those comments with grain of salt as you do. Just the facts ma'am.
However, "Natural B cups, pale, smooth skin, large, plump nipples", "EE cup breasts that sag low on a narrow frame", "lumpy man-made D cups with stretched flat areolas": these are more like descriptions.
But "banging" body "sexy" "bomb" ass etc- Thats just about the reviewer's attraction, not the girl herself.
-
05-20-25 20:27 #10034Senior Member

Posts: 123I agree but sometimes even the reviews are not what they seem. I remember some reviews for the GS Spa on Garvey said how pretty someone was until a picture was shown and it was a big woofer. Best suggestion is read multiple reviews before you go or TOFTT. IE is known for reviews with bait and switched of big whoofers so be happy SGV reviewers give enough details.
Originally Posted by VulvaNut
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-25 17:26 #10033Senior Member

Posts: 223Yes, exactly
Thanks Willie. You get it, re looks, our types, and anatomical preferences.
Originally Posted by Willie23
[View Original Post]
Like the ol box of chocolates. There are some kinds you like, maybe caramel or almond, and some you don't want to get, maybe the hazelnut mint cream and are disappointed after you've already bitten.
Certain boxes have a helpful key or insert, info that lets you know exactly what's what.
-
05-20-25 17:10 #10032Senior Member

Posts: 223Thanks Eilers. But clarifying again.
My suggestion / post about descriptions was based on the review for Yoyo. I did in fact search whether Yoyo was reviewed in other reports recently and already described, and she was not. But had a brain fart and mistakenly wrote "Lola", not Yoyo as I meant. Unfortunately this obfuscated my suggestion that it helps all of us to describe the girl in detail.
Originally Posted by Eilers
[View Original Post]
Thanks again, I appreciate your helpful spirit and info nonetheless.
-
05-20-25 15:50 #10031Senior Member

Posts: 152Good thing I was finally able to get Lola before she left. She's a popular item. Every monger wants her and literally during the session as I was pounding away her bootie hole 3 mongers came in asking for her. She said to keep fucking her ass and cum inside. Paid for the hour, got 2 rounds. CIA and CIM. She's wasn't all that hot in my opinion, but a freak! Came back again the following week, but Lola wasn't there. Got Victoria or something like that. She was pretty, but no extra service. I think my favorite position was banging her doggy. She definitely knows how to get into that doggy position. Probably won't repeat with her again though. Guess we'll have to wait for another monger to check out the new rotation the time comes.
Originally Posted by Jrp21
[View Original Post]
-
05-20-25 15:37 #10030Senior Member

Posts: 173I understand the frustration about the lack of description in some reviews. But understand also that Lola has been extensively reviewed. I'm sure you're not just depending on one review to get you to make that extensive drive from LA or OC to see Lola or any other provider. So doing a search into past reviews I'm sure someone posted a description of her. Usually the first few reviews have all that information in them.
Originally Posted by Willie23
[View Original Post]
I would put Lola about early 30's. She's about average build, MM C's, and stands 5'1"-5'3"ish range. Her face is interesting because it really depends on when you catch her. If she's working that day and she's made up (doesn't put on much makeup) she looks pretty ok. But if not then she's pretty plain and not what I would call a looker. My first time with her she wasn't working that day so she had on a clear face mask. When I asked to see her she said she wasn't working that day and had a mask on. I told her I'd come back. Then she changed her tune and ushered me into a room and I guess got herself ready. What followed was an awesome session of rimming, BBBJ, CFS, DFK, and more rimming, finishing in her mouth.
Also one word of warning for those making that long trek. I've called in to make sure Lola was working only to arrive and she was gone. First time I bounced and came back the next day. Then when I arrived again they said she stepped out to get food or something. I thought that was bullshit but my balls were aching and I had made it a point of seeing Victoria at some point in the future so I just stayed. About 10 minutes later Lola comes back through the door and I ended up w/ a 3some. Session was great with Lola being the highlight. Victoria is 5'2ish, thin, MM C's, her ass is surprisingly nice for someone so thin. She's cute at about a 6/10. I did end up asking where Lola went since I contacted her earlier and she said she went to get food.
Good luck everyone.
-
05-20-25 10:39 #10029Senior Member

Posts: 777I share the frustration with vague reviews. Some of us have specific anatomical preferences and descriptions are important.
Originally Posted by VulvaNut
[View Original Post]
We are talking about travel time on LA streets & freeways and the value of our time in "treatment" and the cash outlay. All those things are investments.
-
05-20-25 03:37 #10028Senior Member

Posts: 223No obligation
Yes, maybe too harsh, apologies. But it was about the review, not the reviewer. At other times MaxG has in fact given descriptive reviews and made great contributions. Not sure he was even aware he made no mention of Yoyo's looks this time.
Originally Posted by Vince682
[View Original Post]
The general point is I'm not the only one here who benefits from descriptions of the provider. (Maybe there are some who don't care what the girl looks like, just what she does?)
Many/most of us use this board to decide exactly who to spend our money on, who is worth seeing, or our type physically.
Then, we want to know we got the right girl, to avoid bait and switch or the name game. Difficult without details.
Could have PM'd him I guess but was just trying to help more than me. Sorry I was too harsh.
Peace.
-
05-20-25 03:14 #10027Senior Member

Posts: 223Yoyo, not Lola
You're right Lost. I meant Yoyo, my bad, had searched recent Happy providers to see if anyone had described her and made a mistake on the name. Apologies, on that aspect of the comment.
Originally Posted by LostLimit
[View Original Post]







Reply With Quote




