Sugarbabies and Arrangements

[DDawgg]

Tried to meet Miamello, Kaitlyn and no luck!

Ally, so hard to get a response.

The good looking ones are so hard to catch.

No fun. Looks like not able to find a good one.

A college girl asks for 600. Is it worth it?

600 is steep for this area, even for a hottie. Most will play ball for 300-400.

[SR7D1]

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...0-10a51953baaf

This scammer is currently on her way to PIB, needs an Uber because she does not drive, and of course would like you to Uber her to you and back. Oh. And she is leaving town tomorrow. LOL.

If you are close to PIB guys, hit her up. Hah.

[TheEndlessEdge]

Any tips on what you look for, or is it just a feel? I get suspicious if they write a long, vague profile. Or things like profile photos are all different styles (or look like shot with an old Nokia).

I look at their pictures generally to see if they're wearing anything Cleveland related or are in Cleveland / Akron / Ohio areas, and I actually take the time to read their profile to see if they're typing the way a real person would and not how a bot would (short, vague, generic, etc.). Sometimes the verification thing isn't always a guarantee of success, but it does help too.

[Berol Loz]

I usually just keep Secretbenefits as a tertiary back-up. Sometimes you can find really good SBs there. It also has more 18 to 20 year old girls making profiles, so you can sometimes luck out and get a good arrangement going on there. But you also really have to read into what profile is real and what isn't.

Any tips on what you look for, or is it just a feel? I get suspicious if they write a long, vague profile. Or things like profile photos are all different styles (or look like shot with an old Nokia).

[TheEndlessEdge]

I'd think it's a toss-up between Seeking and SDM. Seeking costs almost double per month compared to SDM but Seeking has the most members of any of the sugar sites. It's also the only site that's really worldwide. For instance, if you're travelling, you can find ladies everywhere, while SDM's biggest market is North America.

SDM's best feature (besides the price) is that they don't censor discussions about sex and money on the site, so you don't have to leave the platform as soon as you want to talk about details. BTW: Seeking also monitors private chats, so you're not safe asking about PPM even in private messages. SDM, on the other hand, has plenty of profiles with girls saying they're open to PPM, so you know what you're getting into before handing out your contact info. Ladies on SDM are also charged for memberships, so there's a bit of an incentive for them to make a deal.

Both sites use a flat monthly fee, so you're not buying credits to read messages or view pictures.

I usually just keep Secretbenefits as a tertiary back-up. Sometimes you can find really good SBs there. It also has more 18 to 20 year old girls making profiles, so you can sometimes luck out and get a good arrangement going on there. But you also really have to read into what profile is real and what isn't.

[Dudewhereis]

She started off saying she wanted $75 and then progressively started raising up the price for the "deposit" from $75 to $125. She's a little weird. I'm sure she might be legit but from my experience with her, I'm glad I didn't send her anything.

Yea go with your gut. I won't deposit or pay till in person. Even if it's just 30 bucks if you do it over and over it's just a waste of money.

[TheEndlessEdge]

I think the consensus on Ally is already in if you read the reports. 600 is over double what I experience. It takes time and for me, I don't treat it like at escort site, which helps when talking to the women. It's always a YMMV situation. SBs can afford to be picky, it usually isn't how they make a living. Also it depends on your looks and your game. I admit, being single helps. Keep us posted!

She's good about hustling people, so I'd advise most guys to avoid her on that front. She's hot, sexy, etc. , but she's got a lot of simps lined up to cover her on certain things, so the chances of actually meeting are like 1%.

[PurpleJamRocks]

Tried to meet Miamello, Kaitlyn and no luck!

Ally, so hard to get a response.

The good looking ones are so hard to catch.

No fun. Looks like not able to find a good one.

A college girl asks for 600. Is it worth it?

Well good luck with Miamello, she only deals with a couple guys at a time and She doesn't want to go crazy on the sugar scene much these days. Just keep searching till a good one comes along and treat her good.

[SR7D1]

Tried to meet Miamello, Kaitlyn and no luck!

Ally, so hard to get a response.

The good looking ones are so hard to catch.

No fun. Looks like not able to find a good one.

A college girl asks for 600. Is it worth it?

I think the consensus on Ally is already in if you read the reports. 600 is over double what I experience. It takes time and for me, I don't treat it like at escort site, which helps when talking to the women. It's always a YMMV situation. SBs can afford to be picky, it usually isn't how they make a living. Also it depends on your looks and your game. I admit, being single helps. Keep us posted!

[Kabbakabba]

Tried to meet Miamello, Kaitlyn and no luck!

Ally, so hard to get a response.

The good looking ones are so hard to catch.

No fun. Looks like not able to find a good one.

A college girl asks for 600. Is it worth it?

[SR7D1]

Which one is the best?

I'd think it's a toss-up between Seeking and SDM. Seeking costs almost double per month compared to SDM but Seeking has the most members of any of the sugar sites. It's also the only site that's really worldwide. For instance, if you're travelling, you can find ladies everywhere, while SDM's biggest market is North America.

SDM's best feature (besides the price) is that they don't censor discussions about sex and money on the site, so you don't have to leave the platform as soon as you want to talk about details. BTW: Seeking also monitors private chats, so you're not safe asking about PPM even in private messages. SDM, on the other hand, has plenty of profiles with girls saying they're open to PPM, so you know what you're getting into before handing out your contact info. Ladies on SDM are also charged for memberships, so there's a bit of an incentive for them to make a deal.

Both sites use a flat monthly fee, so you're not buying credits to read messages or view pictures.

I would suggest trying them all and see what you have the best luck with. Berol summed it up, pretty well.

[Berol Loz]

Which one is the best?

I'd think it's a toss-up between Seeking and SDM. Seeking costs almost double per month compared to SDM but Seeking has the most members of any of the sugar sites. It's also the only site that's really worldwide. For instance, if you're travelling, you can find ladies everywhere, while SDM's biggest market is North America.

SDM's best feature (besides the price) is that they don't censor discussions about sex and money on the site, so you don't have to leave the platform as soon as you want to talk about details. BTW: Seeking also monitors private chats, so you're not safe asking about PPM even in private messages. SDM, on the other hand, has plenty of profiles with girls saying they're open to PPM, so you know what you're getting into before handing out your contact info. Ladies on SDM are also charged for memberships, so there's a bit of an incentive for them to make a deal.

Both sites use a flat monthly fee, so you're not buying credits to read messages or view pictures.

[Kabbakabba]

I have met women on all three platforms. SB is by far the least productive and costly from my experience. But I have met women on there. I was surprised by SDM and the results actually.

There is more cross posting between SB and Seeking from my experience.

Which one is the best?

[SR7D1]

I have been on seeking and secretbenefits but never sugardaddymeet how does it compare to the other sites in quality as well as success rate. Also do you see a lot of the same girls from the other two sites?

I have met women on all three platforms. SB is by far the least productive and costly from my experience. But I have met women on there. I was surprised by SDM and the results actually.

There is more cross posting between SB and Seeking from my experience.

[ShowTime1721]

When I go through profiles, I look for girls with a couple of full-body shots and something in their profile that suggests they're interested in meeting up (as opposed to just chatting virtually). Also, seem to have good luck with single moms. Also, the end of the month can sometimes be a goldmine as new girls arrive to make some quick cash.

Mariamare, 23.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...72&tab=summary

"Ask for my links" single mom. Not sure if she's selling OnlyFans or she's semi-pro?

Tessaray, 20.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73587546&nsp=1

"looking for honest fun meets".

Darling, 25.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73671390&nsp=1

"looking for a mutually benefical agreement".

Baddielily, 22.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73716434&nsp=1

"currently unemployed, I want a sugar daddy that will take care of me".

Cherryprincess, 22.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73524774&nsp=1

"welcome to my page looking 4 fun and a good time" - well she knows how to use a pole (video).

Mmoore2022,22.

https://www.sugardaddymeet.com/userP...73249639&nsp=1

"talk and keep you company. Goign to school for nursing, I'm a single mom of 2. " Not sure if she's willing to do in-person or just virtual.

I haven't got a response back for either of these today, but will update if I hear back. Also, included the pictures if anyone recognises them from Seeking.

I have been on seeking and secretbenefits but never sugardaddymeet how does it compare to the other sites in quality as well as success rate. Also do you see a lot of the same girls from the other two sites?