Thread: The Raleigh area "Sugar Bowl" (SA, WYP, SD4 ME)
+
Add Report
Results 526 to 540 of 5573
-
04-11-25 10:20 #5048Senior Member

Posts: 80It's their attempt at limiting the scammers. Is it required now? I have a fake profile as well as my real one and it keeps getting pop ups asking to verify but so far it's not required. We've all complained at the increase in scammers over the years, now they're trying to give everyone some confidence that the person they're talking to is real. Most if not all of the dating services are doing it now. I verified on my real profile because I'm divorced and no longer have any reason not to. It will be interesting to see how many paying customers they drive away and whether they change their minds. It does appear that many of the girls are doing it and the ones that don't have the verification are more likely to look like scammers to me. For what it's worth I've been told several times in the last month or so that girls specifically wrote back to me because I have verified in multiple ways but I'm sure there are girls on there that realize the married guys won't verify so I don't know how much difference it will make.
Originally Posted by Falconwings33
[View Original Post]
-
04-10-25 22:16 #5047Senior Member

Posts: 98Seeking new selfie rule
So I deleted my old profile sometime back and was trying to sign up again and it is now asking me to verify with a selfie? WTF is that? Did any of you guys do that? Like why would they make it so hard to sign up and chase their paying customers away, frekin makes no sense.
-
04-09-25 20:54 #5046Senior Member

Posts: 429I don't know how real this bio is. On the first photo she's sitting in a private jet. I noticed she wears a Rolex watch.
Originally Posted by Swimback
[View Original Post]
If she's real, she's not going to be cheap. At all.
-
04-09-25 20:02 #5045Senior Member

Posts: 67Sofia
Has anyone seen this one? DM me with details and let's compare notes.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...d-1d94724947d9
-
04-09-25 14:15 #5044Senior Member

Posts: 2335My friend you just described 90% of all of these girls. I'm beginning to question why not just regular date. Men used to have a young mistress as a by production of a successful like! Social media has kill that I imagine. They all seem to think, and reinforced by weak simps IMO, that their v-jay give them the right to a luxe life while giving nothing in return. I did a duo once with SBs and it was OK. Is avoid unless you can get them to agree to P2P without changing rubbers (better yet test and raw) as it's a real drag to have to stop and change rubbers. Really. They dous are typically scams on SA SB.
Originally Posted by YourCCPimp
[View Original Post]
Peace.
-
04-08-25 16:57 #5043Senior Member

Posts: 236Love
I talked with Love not too long ago and She wanted 1 k ppm. That pretty much ended the conversation on my end.
Originally Posted by SaintMan3500
[View Original Post]
-
04-08-25 16:31 #5042Senior Member

Posts: 204Joy and Sophia
I've only had conversations with Joy and Sophia. I would avoid both. Both are pretty forceful about wanting to drain your bank account and treat you like garbage. At least for Joy, she seems surprised that no one wants to let her drain their bank account without even giving them sex. And she's not even very cute. As for Sophia, she just seems like a straight up B. She wants to be more of a dom or something. She is cute though if the pics are real.
Originally Posted by SaintMan3500
[View Original Post]
-
04-08-25 16:30 #5041Senior Member

Posts: 78I met Ophelia a long while back under a different name. She was nice- had a fun time we just didn't really click so I never saw her a second time. The sign in the background makes me kinda nervous with everything that's been going on.
Originally Posted by SaintMan3500
[View Original Post]
I messaged with Sophie some but was weird- like you I wonder if she's real.
-
04-08-25 16:13 #5040Senior Member

Posts: 138Has Anyone Meet These Sugar Babes? Any Positive or Negative Experiences?
Has anyone talked to, seen, met or had a full on arrangement with these women?
1. Samara.
Attractive. Not a bad profile. Decent amount of pics, some. Interesting. Conversation wise, was very bubbly and talkative. Talked plans and she gave me her snapchat and initially conversed, but then stopped responding when it came to specifics.
https://members.seeking.com/member/1...0-279dc1689de2
2. Joy.
Decent to talk to. Decent pics. But keeps trying to get me to go to dinner with her? Very adament on that for some reason. I haven't moved forward with her.
https://members.seeking.com/member/d...a-48b3c3868c9a
3. Strawberrysqt.
Decent looking. Standard profile. Seems to want straightforwardness, since she's "busy".
https://members.seeking.com/member/ea3588f3-41fd-4613-ae1a-f5a4b2518265
4. Sophia.
Not even sure if this person is real or not. Doesn't respond but viewed profile a few times. Bio claims she's "Evil" and looking for a slave.
https://members.seeking.com/member/a...a-32cb0c62b482
5. Ophelia.
Near her mid 30's. Looks okay. Standard / basic profile, nothing stands out except her eyes.
https://members.seeking.com/member/2...b-f47b64d62ab6
6. Anita.
Early 30's. Only two pics public. Says she's gotten out of a divorce and doesn't tolerate disrespect or what men think she wants. Other than that, basic.
https://members.seeking.com/member/b...8-92fd580647a3
7. Kay.
Supposedly been on seeking since 2024. Looks real, but something seems off. Can't explain it. Not a good bio but nothing negative either.
https://members.seeking.com/member/7...e-cc5ce2217c3c
8. Love.
Well well. This one looks quite attractive. Says she's very good at communication and appreciates bluntness. Says she wants a partner who is open to what she does for work.
https://members.seeking.com/member/6...1-f2460ce7d305
9. Sweet101.
Has anyone even entertained this? Even just for laughs? This individual has been on the same for years and has the same terrible bio and only one pic. "Cute couple looking for fun".
https://members.seeking.com/member/1...8-79d7a4048aa8
10. Charrose xoxo.
Apparently been on seeking for years. I remember talking to her in the past, but she'd eventually ghost.
https://members.seeking.com/member/0...5-cebbe2f11f21
Yup! I swear it's like the same 3-6 "Experienced Sugar Babes" that I've seen on the site for years, who are just completely dry or uninteresting. While throwing breadcrumbs here and there, or being absolutely horrible in communication.
Originally Posted by Swimback
[View Original Post]
-
04-08-25 11:41 #5039Senior Member

Posts: 78https://members.seeking.com/member/e...3-59ef4c586d32
Originally Posted by LikesGirls
[View Original Post]
-
04-08-25 10:41 #5038Senior Member

Posts: 429Do you have a link to her profile?
Originally Posted by NepKng
[View Original Post]
-
04-08-25 09:54 #5037Senior Member

Posts: 78SA Cat from Wilson
Has anyone had any experience with her?
-
04-07-25 21:07 #5036Senior Member

Posts: 429She hasn't answered my texts either. Has anyone seen her recently? As in, the last couple weeks?
Originally Posted by Rgfct4
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-25 20:27 #5035Regular Member

Posts: 12Went to check out SB because SA wouldn't accept Amex or MC gift cards. Looks like it'll be the same issue with SB sadly.
Originally Posted by PriceIsRight39
[View Original Post]
It looks like MC put a hold on my card due to it being compromised and wants me to open a case file to get a new card. Wtf ....
-
04-07-25 15:23 #5034Senior Member

Posts: 2335Sometimes ladies car "report" you for whatever reason. So I've heard. Believe all women I guess. Seeking is under the spotlight and the rules are tight. It's becoming talked about as escorting. Find a good one and go UTR. I never went back to seeking. The last one I had there had a pimp. I'm afraid more than we care to know are managed. SB has not hassled me and I talk fairly open. I try to get a girl to txt ASAP if she won't I just pass.
Originally Posted by Smokey1986
[View Original Post]
Enjoy.









Reply With Quote






