Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 1,786 to 1,800 of 10492
-
01-10-25 02:30 #8707Senior Member

Posts: 388Shani or b. Sugar?
I've always been curious about Shani but never bothered to see her when she transitioned to GFE only. Now that more is available, is she the same level as baby sugar based on looks?
Originally Posted by CreamInside
[View Original Post]
Yes, I know. I keep asking for a comparison of B. Sugar but she likes to disappear after a couples weeks then disappears for a couple months. Been searching for an option b for when she disappears again.
-
01-10-25 01:19 #8706Senior Member

Posts: 801Bbfs
Yes, of course. Totally agree. Anyone who is in a relationship should absolutely be using protection at all times. It's not fair to the other person to potentially expose them to some nasty shit. At times in my life when I've been married or had a girlfriend, I have either used a cover or stayed away from the hobby all together.
Originally Posted by Mmmmm00
[View Original Post]
But for anyone who is single and not in a relationship — which is where I find myself today — then my philosophy is, "Enjoy it while it lasts!" As long as the BBFS is consensual, agreed upon by the customer and the girl, then it's a wonderful thing that should be openly pursued by anyone who desires it. And anyone who doesn't like that situation is totally justified in not seeing that girl.
That's what I love about this hobby. We get to choose. The customer is king.
-
01-09-25 21:36 #8705Senior Member

Posts: 174Thats your personal preference and I'm sure it's shared with a lot of other mongers which is fine. There's still a market for covered sessions. I personally don't BBFS girls who openly BBFS and I'm sure there are mongers in committed relationships who only do covered sessions.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
-
01-09-25 18:50 #8704Senior Member

Posts: 801Bbfs
Yup, good move on Shani's part. I think BBFS has become a necessary offering for all but the legendary, veteran k-girls who have been here for 8 to 10 years or more. Those k-girls generally see the same regular customers all the time, so it's a different vibe. They can offer BB or not, and it has less of an impact on their business. And I suspect some of them do it on a selective, customer-by-customer basis.
Originally Posted by CreamInside
[View Original Post]
Everybody else needs to openly offer BB, or they will get overtaken by the high level of competition in LA. Most of the newer ladies are doing it. (And by "newer," I mean k-girls who have been around for 3 to 5 years or less.) There are always exceptions, of course, but I think that is the general rule these days. And I think it's a good thing. The hobby is way better without having to strangle your dick with a rubber hose. It's like fucking through a tire. It's just not the way it was meant to be. LOL!
-
01-09-25 08:44 #8703Senior Member

Posts: 303Great news, BBFS is back on the table
Great news since it seems like Shani is offering BBFS again for upcharge which is well worth it IMO. One of the nicest and smoothest pussies and hottest K-girls I ever had the pleasure of filling up with cum.
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/shani
-
01-09-25 08:42 #8702Senior Member

Posts: 303Looks like she's been busy as her pricing has increased from 320 to 350 for the base rate. There is definitely some gatekeeping going on!
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 17:44 #8701Senior Member

Posts: 31Sloppy wet and slow BJ. Def not usual Kgirl type service. She's very petite. One of those rarer times where door opened and you immediately recognized her.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 01:33 #8700Senior Member

Posts: 2442Thanks for the heads up. Nakamura surprised me with better head than I expected. How's Saki with suckin and service in general?
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 01:30 #8699Senior Member

Posts: 3482She's not Baby Soyu or Sweet Soyu. (Click here) for rebrand thread and you can find for names. She was with the defunct Sexy Angels. Here are her reviews (click here) and probably this as well (click here).
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
01-08-25 01:19 #8698Senior Member

Posts: 3482Just to show how good I am at guessing age, this pic makes me think of an Obasan. I haven't tried either yet.
Originally Posted by Dewpsp
[View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 18:48 #8697Senior Member

Posts: 571Candygirl, nanakgirls.
Originally Posted by Chiticalar
[View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 18:19 #8696Senior Member

Posts: 39Who is her booker and does anyone has a link?
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
Thank you.
-
01-07-25 16:09 #8695Senior Member

Posts: 31Should a went with her. Was between her and baby Ena. And Ena is def not young. Only from one specific angle that she looked under 30 to me.
Originally Posted by BobLove
[View Original Post]
-
01-07-25 13:20 #8694Senior Member

Posts: 748Soyu
Has anyone seen the new Soyu? https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/soyu Anyone recognize her pics or seen her?
Is she a rebrand of Baby Soyu, Sweet Soyu. Too many girls with the same name.
-
01-07-25 02:02 #8693Senior Member

Posts: 421Oh shit I kinda remember that chest tattooo. I think I banged her at an SGV house back in the days.
Originally Posted by CreampieSupply
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote










