MSP Sugar

**Rambo21** · 12-11-24 10:27

Originally Posted by Pppeeter [View Original Post]

So basically she though you lowballed her, got mad about it and instead of negotiating, she reported you LOL. Sounds like she was going to be a scam anyways. And its easy enough to make a new account.

If you have a premium account and get banned then the address you used for your credit card payment is banned. They also store the I'd of the device you are using to access the site.

**Pppeeter** · 12-11-24 01:49

Originally Posted by WoozerBuck [View Original Post]

Was with fraudulent females, not the guys looking for fun, but it may help. It was a shitshow.

What do you mean? I don't believe they are just making the female accounts do the verification selfie. I know a guy who tried to make an account just the other day and it wouldn't let him because he wouldn't take a selfie.

**WoozerBuck** · 12-10-24 23:12

Originally Posted by Pppeeter [View Original Post]

Did everyone get that email from seeking today / yesterday? How they are going to combat fraud and scammers by making everyone that creates a new account, (and in the future all existing members) to take a selfie and send it in to verify you are who you say you are? Well, if that's the case they are going to lose a lot of customers I think. I know I won't be submitting a selfie for them to "verify" its me. No thanks, aren't they aware guys that are on it and using it are looking for discretion? Seems like a good way to tank your site. Sure, getting rid of the scamming / fraudulent baby accounts would be great, but it seems like there should be a better way of doing that than also making the "daddy's" take verification pics as well.

Was with fraudulent females, not the guys looking for fun, but it may help. It was a shitshow.

**Pppeeter** · 12-10-24 20:58

Did everyone get that email from seeking today / yesterday? How they are going to combat fraud and scammers by making everyone that creates a new account, (and in the future all existing members) to take a selfie and send it in to verify you are who you say you are? Well, if that's the case they are going to lose a lot of customers I think. I know I won't be submitting a selfie for them to "verify" its me. No thanks, aren't they aware guys that are on it and using it are looking for discretion? Seems like a good way to tank your site. Sure, getting rid of the scamming / fraudulent baby accounts would be great, but it seems like there should be a better way of doing that than also making the "daddy's" take verification pics as well.

**Pppeeter** · 12-06-24 22:45

Originally Posted by Rambo21 [View Original Post]

I think a sugar baby reported me for offering PPM.

When I was active I think it took contacting at least 50 sugar babies to result in an actual first meeting.

So basically she though you lowballed her, got mad about it and instead of negotiating, she reported you LOL. Sounds like she was going to be a scam anyways. And its easy enough to make a new account.

**Rambo21** · 12-06-24 17:30

Originally Posted by Pppeeter [View Original Post]

What did you get banned for?

Response rate is really good. Actual legitimate potential connections, not as good.

I think a sugar baby reported me for offering PPM.

When I was active I think it took contacting at least 50 sugar babies to result in an actual first meeting.

**Pppeeter** · 12-06-24 15:32

Originally Posted by Rambo21 [View Original Post]

I was on Seeking a long time until I got banned. For those of you currently browsing the site, what is your response rate like?

What did you get banned for?

Response rate is really good. Actual legitimate potential connections, not as good.

**Nashorn** · 12-06-24 14:49

Originally Posted by Zipp531 [View Original Post]

Laylarose - https://members.seeking.com/member/5...6-bc897a2e8bc5.

Also, talked to Sophia, she also has a WYP profile. No car, asks for a compensated public meeting. No intimacy on first date.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...e-6d1242f77a3d

In minecraft, I saw her 1.5 years ago. 4 for 2 times BBFS, no CIP, can't host. Nice body. A bit shy. Nice body. Would repeat if I didn't have to get a room.

**Rambo21** · 12-06-24 10:33

I was on Seeking a long time until I got banned. For those of you currently browsing the site, what is your response rate like?

**Spaniard21** · 12-05-24 13:53

This one wants 900. Holy s.

https://members.seeking.com/member/4...6-926a1403d45b

Blondebb1990's.

Wow.

**Zipp531** · 12-04-24 21:46

Laylarose - https://members.seeking.com/member/5...6-bc897a2e8bc5.

Also, talked to Sophia, she also has a WYP profile. No car, asks for a compensated public meeting. No intimacy on first date.

https://members.seeking.com/member/3...e-6d1242f77a3d

**Tang07** · 12-02-24 14:02

Originally Posted by Freakin69 [View Original Post]

Covered or bare? Seems a bit high for covered, maybe that's just me.

She wanted covered, I negotiated for bare and got bare and got to CIP. I suspect it depends on how much she likes you.

**Freakin69** · 12-01-24 18:58

Originally Posted by Booger2020 [View Original Post]

I've started chatting with Raven on Seeking. Have any of you guys met her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/c...2-4d8765aa9ba9

I met her a few years ago once. It was a rushed experience, no GFE at all. And everything covered. It was overall a lame experience, I did not see her again.

**Freakin69** · 12-01-24 18:54

Originally Posted by Tang07 [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...c-37e5c018a8c2

Small spinner, tight pussy.

500 will get you access. She's ghetto and shy. She flaked too many times for me to keep her, but she's real.

Covered or bare? Seems a bit high for covered, maybe that's just me.

**Zipp531** · 12-01-24 18:49

Originally Posted by Tang07 [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/1...c-37e5c018a8c2

Small spinner, tight pussy.

500 will get you access. She's ghetto and shy. She flaked too many times for me to keep her, but she's real.

Crazy, she has her ppm rate in her profile. I guess that's allowed for the ladies.