Arrangement Reports

**RadCoach** · 09-12-24 18:45

Originally Posted by BJinWauk [View Original Post]

While I don't have experience specifically with her, my experience has been that there are legit women who come to find a arrangement, and then stop logging in when they find one. They then return when that one ends and are seeking a new one, or may need extra income. That isn't to say that makes this one legit, but I wouldn't automatically discount her because you don't recall having seen her online. Just one guy's perspective.

Upon entering into an arrangement that I think is going to be relatively long term, I expect the girl to turn off her profile.

**BJinWauk** · 09-12-24 10:45

Originally Posted by BeNewAgain [View Original Post]

I'm trying to figure out what the deal is with this one. Just started chatting and so far it seems legit, but I have never seen her profile before and I've been on seeking for years in Milwaukee. Says she joined in 2022. Anyone have experience?

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...c-57af6755596d

While I don't have experience specifically with her, my experience has been that there are legit women who come to find a arrangement, and then stop logging in when they find one. They then return when that one ends and are seeking a new one, or may need extra income. That isn't to say that makes this one legit, but I wouldn't automatically discount her because you don't recall having seen her online. Just one guy's perspective.

**BeNewAgain** · 09-11-24 18:37

I'm trying to figure out what the deal is with this one. Just started chatting and so far it seems legit, but I have never seen her profile before and I've been on seeking for years in Milwaukee. Says she joined in 2022. Anyone have experience?

https://members.seeking.com/member/d...c-57af6755596d

**JohneDrama** · 09-10-24 14:11

If anyone has a good one they can lend. PM me.

**RadCoach** · 08-24-24 14:01

Originally Posted by BJinWauk [View Original Post]

Exact same filter criteria gets the exact same results. Doesn't mean you aren't having good luck there, but they are definetely the same site posing as seperate sites.

Yea sure looks that way.

**BJinWauk** · 08-24-24 10:26

Originally Posted by RadCoach [View Original Post]

Sugardaddy has been very good for me. I can't say whether or not it's identical to secret benefits, I haven't tried it. I can say that I nearly always get replies on there and more often than not it's a real American girl on the other end LOL.

Exact same filter criteria gets the exact same results. Doesn't mean you aren't having good luck there, but they are definetely the same site posing as seperate sites.

**RadCoach** · 08-23-24 16:29

Originally Posted by MrBreeder2 [View Original Post]

Sugardaddy.com is identical to both as well.

Sugardaddy has been very good for me. I can't say whether or not it's identical to secret benefits, I haven't tried it. I can say that I nearly always get replies on there and more often than not it's a real American girl on the other end LOL.

**MrBreeder2** · 08-23-24 14:30

Originally Posted by BJinWauk [View Original Post]

Secret Benefits has been the biggest waste of money on sites like this I have spent. No one ever replies to messages. I think I had one person in all that I messaged respond. I made the mistake of buying a credit package there and will never make that mistake again. I had more luck on WYP for crying out loud.

Sugardaddy.com is identical to both as well.

**Gfe12** · 08-22-24 11:18

Originally Posted by PeckerHead [View Original Post]

I've had some luck but yeah it is still a ripoff. Everything on that site cost credits. Opening secret photos, opening messages, boosting messages, etc.

Damn, so still just tons of mongers on the sites, and a few "real" youngins, and tons of fake profiles from other countries trying to rip off people, and other real workers on there. The time I wasted in the effort of the site is just not worth it. I wish there was a better way of having the "real" legit girls that want an arrangement, regardless if its ppm or monthly. But the time it takes to weed them out sucks. I had some gems a few years ago, but being out of the game has me not sure if I want to spend that time again.

**PeckerHead** · 08-21-24 17:20

Originally Posted by BJinWauk [View Original Post]

Secret Benefits has been the biggest waste of money on sites like this I have spent. No one ever replies to messages. I think I had one person in all that I messaged respond. I made the mistake of buying a credit package there and will never make that mistake again. I had more luck on WYP for crying out loud.

I've had some luck but yeah it is still a ripoff. Everything on that site cost credits. Opening secret photos, opening messages, boosting messages, etc.

**BJinWauk** · 08-21-24 13:47

Originally Posted by RadCoach [View Original Post]

I've had some luck on sugar daddy.com, though they operate on purchased credits as well. The positive thing about it is hat the girls there seem to be real, less scammers and less pros than SA.

I dunno. It has the exact same lay out, same price structure for credits and same women as Secret Benefits. If you had luck on there, more power to you. But after my experience on Secret Benefits, they won't get a nickle of my money.

**BJinWauk** · 08-21-24 13:43

Originally Posted by PeckerHead [View Original Post]

It's a little slow right now on SA. It usually is though this time of year. Next month it should start to get busy. Most of the other sites are owned by the same guy that owns SA. If you go on Luxurydate.com you will see the exactly same women as secretbenefits.com. The website template is identical except luxurydate.com uses purple as the main color. I've tried secretbenefits.com and did not pay for a few months. Just checked it out. I would get 2-3 messages a day with no profile photo. You have to buy credits to unlock those messages. My curiosity got the best of me so I bought 100 credits for $69. Since then I do not get 2-3 messages a day anymore.

Secret Benefits has been the biggest waste of money on sites like this I have spent. No one ever replies to messages. I think I had one person in all that I messaged respond. I made the mistake of buying a credit package there and will never make that mistake again. I had more luck on WYP for crying out loud.

**RadCoach** · 08-21-24 09:15

Originally Posted by Gfe12 [View Original Post]

Hey gents. Been a few years since I mongered. How is SA? Are there other legit sites right now? Or is SA still the best of the worst? I am seeking some young puss right now and need it!! However, SA was always my go to for the girls who weren't "pros" yet.

I've had some luck on sugar daddy.com, though they operate on purchased credits as well. The positive thing about it is hat the girls there seem to be real, less scammers and less pros than SA.

**PeckerHead** · 08-20-24 15:49

Originally Posted by Gfe12 [View Original Post]

Hey gents. Been a few years since I mongered. How is SA? Are there other legit sites right now? Or is SA still the best of the worst? I am seeking some young puss right now and need it!! However, SA was always my go to for the girls who weren't "pros" yet.

It's a little slow right now on SA. It usually is though this time of year. Next month it should start to get busy. Most of the other sites are owned by the same guy that owns SA. If you go on Luxurydate.com you will see the exactly same women as secretbenefits.com. The website template is identical except luxurydate.com uses purple as the main color. I've tried secretbenefits.com and did not pay for a few months. Just checked it out. I would get 2-3 messages a day with no profile photo. You have to buy credits to unlock those messages. My curiosity got the best of me so I bought 100 credits for $69. Since then I do not get 2-3 messages a day anymore.

**Gfe12** · 08-20-24 13:01

Hey gents. Been a few years since I mongered. How is SA? Are there other legit sites right now? Or is SA still the best of the worst? I am seeking some young puss right now and need it!! However, SA was always my go to for the girls who weren't "pros" yet.