Rubrankings.com
Top Escorts
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Thread: Escort Reports

+ Add Report
Page 172 of 1131 FirstFirst ... 72 122 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 222 272 672 ... LastLast
Results 2,566 to 2,580 of 16951
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #14386
    Quote Originally Posted by MavericksDick  [View Original Post]
    Wow! Shows how much Stl needs talent. For. 3 she is booked up for her first week.

    Be careful with BBFS.
    Just remember that all of the "ladies" do BBFS with someone. Maybe not all of their customers, but with the ones that are repeat customers, or just the ones they like the most. There is a couple that do me bare, that advertise no BBFS.

  2. #14385
    Quote Originally Posted by KandaBongoMan  [View Original Post]
    Well, I didn't know that BBFS was considered a standard option of K-Girls. For me any escort that offers BBFS is off the list. I understand that all of this has certain risks, but a provider that offers BBFS puts themselves at considerable extra risk thus puts me at additional risk. Just not worth it to me. Not judging anyone else for partaking, just not for me.
    K Agencies are very common in larger cities. Almost every single one I've ever come across offers BBFS for an additional $100 - $150 ish.

  3. #14384
    Quote Originally Posted by MavericksDick  [View Original Post]
    Wow! Shows how much Stl needs talent. For. 3 she is booked up for her first week.

    Be careful with BBFS.
    If St. Louis finally has a real K Agency, they'll be booked solid for months. https://www.wonderfuldays.org/

  4. #14383

    Didn't know

    Quote Originally Posted by Dasgtin123  [View Original Post]
    Well its one of the special "feature" of Korean Agency, yes it is extra, but it's like one of the their best selling point, and pretty common in other big cities.

    You don't have to part take, but that's not red flag either.
    Well, I didn't know that BBFS was considered a standard option of K-Girls. For me any escort that offers BBFS is off the list. I understand that all of this has certain risks, but a provider that offers BBFS puts themselves at considerable extra risk thus puts me at additional risk. Just not worth it to me. Not judging anyone else for partaking, just not for me.

  5. #14382
    Quote Originally Posted by CoMoTgr  [View Original Post]
    Share with us all. I am very interested in checking her out, but would also like to know more, it seems too good to be true.
    Wow! Shows how much Stl needs talent. For. 3 she is booked up for her first week.

    Be careful with BBFS.

  6. #14381

    Haru

    Quote Originally Posted by EsGarcea  [View Original Post]
    Whoever sees Haru today, shoot me a PM. I have an appt tomorrow. I'm interested in how it went and what her looks and body type actually are. Thanks!
    Share with us all. I am very interested in checking her out, but would also like to know more, it seems too good to be true.

  7. #14380
    Whoever sees Haru today, shoot me a PM. I have an appt tomorrow. I'm interested in how it went and what her looks and body type actually are. Thanks!

  8. #14379

    K-agency

    Quote Originally Posted by KandaBongoMan  [View Original Post]
    I actually have a session booked with Haru. However I am having second thoughts. I've read numerous reviews where she appears to offer BBFS. I know we take risk with BBBJ, but BBFS is a different level for me and a red flag.
    Well its one of the special "feature" of Korean Agency, yes it is extra, but it's like one of the their best selling point, and pretty common in other big cities.

    You don't have to part take, but that's not red flag either.

  9. #14378
    Quote Originally Posted by KandaBongoMan  [View Original Post]
    I actually have a session booked with Haru. However I am having second thoughts. I've read numerous reviews where she appears to offer BBFS. I know we take risk with BBBJ, but BBFS is a different level for me and a red flag.
    My understanding is BBFS is extra. So if you don't want it, don't do it. 🤷8205;9794;65039;.

  10. #14377

    Haru

    Quote Originally Posted by JBurrows  [View Original Post]
    Truly appreciate ALL the intel & feedback on this one! That is why I'm here & a member for, well, too long! LOL!

    She did contact me again wanting to begin the verification process. Says she's coming on the 17th to the Forest Park area. So far verification is really nothing but name, age, & race. She did provide another site for reference https://www.wonderfuldays.org/ . Just a duplication of what's on Tryst.

    I would agree that most of what I've "dug up" points to agency which is fine by me. (It's a first for me but just fine.) My only concern now (w / agencies) is a potential set up. You know, like LEO watching, following the group, then ruining the party. That's why I've avoided AMP or the like so far. I just feel that too much traffic, too many posts, too much communication, raising too many eyebrows.

    Just don't need Barney Fife trying to make a name for himself or get him a promotion. You know, seeing the inbound visitor giving him time to plan out something. Just my thoughts..
    I actually have a session booked with Haru. However I am having second thoughts. I've read numerous reviews where she appears to offer BBFS. I know we take risk with BBBJ, but BBFS is a different level for me and a red flag.

  11. #14376

    Rosa

    Anyone have info on Rosa? https://tryst.link/escort/rosa314.

    One recent review on TER which was pretty positive. Checks all the boxes for me in that review, DFK, DATY, BBBJ and CIM.

    Just wondering if anyone else has seen her.

  12. #14375

    Rye

    This is the name that appears on her latest ad (that I saw) on Listcrawler. I don't think I've ever seen an ad that gets straight to the business the way this one does. I'm not in the game right now but if I were I'd give her a shot.

    https://listcrawler.eu/last_phone_post/7749992782

  13. #14374

    Michelle Sweets

    Quote Originally Posted by RomanBath  [View Original Post]
    Yeah, I saw her at the beginning of the year and posted about her. It was a good time and she is a sweet girl who is not on drugs and is down to earth / friendly. My only issue is she implied she was GFE, but I would not call her that. But maybe she just wasn't into me enough. She did say that she is back doing this after like 7 years away. And funny thing is after I saw her I vaguely remember seeing her before, and had the same thought that she was hot but wished she was the GFE she implied. Or was that Mariah Skyy? Oh well. My memory does suck, but I also question the value of doing this if I don't remember so much of my encounters. LOL.
    LOL! Thank you for the reply. I thought the same thing. I knew I had been with that girl before. Her name was really familiar so I checked my contacts and she wasn't in there. Ohhhhh Mariah Sky. That definitely rings a bell. I had some good times with her too.

  14. #14373
    Quote Originally Posted by King50  [View Original Post]
    To all ladies in this town, you need to change your business model to compete with visitors. Visitors are good looking and they ask for reasonable donations.
    100% agree. But we have a NCNS (no call no show) reputation that keeps a lot of visitors from coming here. However there are about 5-10 girls locally that provide a quality service.

  15. #14372

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
Top Tier Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Protected by Copyscape