Escort Reports

**Delltate** · 07-05-24 20:21

Do you mean the one who went by Kandy, who stayed at Days Inn near the Airport in about 2019? That hair description sounds like her (maybe not the couples part, though).

Originally Posted by AlphaBull [View Original Post]

Does anyone remember the little blonde that worked with couples? Her hair was sometimes died different colors. Would like to touch base with her.

**BullCity1** · 07-05-24 19:38

https://skipthegames.com/posts/green...d/641525957515

**TheDivide** · 07-05-24 15:56

Anyone have any good UTR providers? The song and dance on the sites is getting ridiculous. Just feel free to inbox.

**JRSmith274** · 07-05-24 14:27

Originally Posted by AlphaBull [View Original Post]

Emilly I don't have her contact.

Try Nina. She's in Greensboro off Veasley. Beautiful girl. Good time from my experience.

JR.

https://skipthegames.com/reply/phone/529428325059

**JRSmith274** · 07-05-24 14:05

Originally Posted by HappyHiker23 [View Original Post]

I haven't actually seen her but she has some solid reviews on both that site and on here.

I've seen her several times. She's really good looking. Nice skills. Tight little kitty. Always had a good time with her. She does have a pimp but I've never seen him. She's still on my list.

JR.

**HappyHiker23** · 07-05-24 10:03

Originally Posted by Valhallaknight [View Original Post]

Anyone have intel on this one?

https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/9148486088

I haven't actually seen her but she has some solid reviews on both that site and on here.

**Valhallaknight** · 07-05-24 09:31

Anyone have intel on this one?

https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/9148486088

**AlphaBull** · 07-04-24 18:04

Originally Posted by AintBnBad [View Original Post]

Can anyone recommend a reliable AA provider? Thanks guys.

Emilly I don't have her contact.

**AlphaBull** · 07-04-24 16:42

Does anyone remember the little blonde that worked with couples? Her hair was sometimes died different colors. Would like to touch base with her.

**FSmith9009** · 07-04-24 10:14

Originally Posted by MrSmithwick [View Original Post]

Trying to get stiffer penalties to thwart would be mongers from getting some pussy for pay. If they wanted to truly make an impact. They should do away with women being able to take their husband for 50% or more in divorce. There should no longer be an incentive for a woman to leave a marriage. What she came with is what she can leave with. Many men work their ass off and make their wives life better than their own so if a woman wants to leave, she can leave empty handed. Many men such as myself have a lot of assets they could be taken away in divorce so it's quite risky. Who in their right mind would bring on a business partner that you'd have to give half of your business to if they they decide to leave?? So we need to fix that before we deal with P4 P and women renting their kitty out because marriage is basically the SAME THING!

I agree. Married women are essentially legalized prostitutes. The penalty for this sex bill is ridiculous.

**FSmith9009** · 07-04-24 10:12

Originally Posted by MmceStep [View Original Post]

Without saying anything that will identify myself, my work has me interfacing with the legislature and State exec administration. This was a Republican bill. It was named with its tagline for good reason. It's uncomfortable to oppose such initiatives, as you would imagine. The State executive tried to kill this many times. Cooper has reserved his futile veto only in the cases where it was demonstrably important to his side to use it, and once where it was important for timing purposes. They've all been quickly overridden. In this case there was no demonstrable benefit to doing so. I had this explained to me personally by a top aide.

Slowly and quietly they are taking away our freedoms. This generation is in trouble.

**MrSmithwick** · 07-04-24 01:31

Trying to get stiffer penalties to thwart would be mongers from getting some pussy for pay. If they wanted to truly make an impact. They should do away with women being able to take their husband for 50% or more in divorce. There should no longer be an incentive for a woman to leave a marriage. What she came with is what she can leave with. Many men work their ass off and make their wives life better than their own so if a woman wants to leave, she can leave empty handed. Many men such as myself have a lot of assets they could be taken away in divorce so it's quite risky. Who in their right mind would bring on a business partner that you'd have to give half of your business to if they they decide to leave?? So we need to fix that before we deal with P4 P and women renting their kitty out because marriage is basically the SAME THING!

Originally Posted by MmceStep [View Original Post]

I don't even think stings are the biggest problem now. The biggest worry I see is the leverage shifting entirely to the providers in this situation. Imagine if a girl steals from you. If you catch her, she can just call the cops instead of having to give you back what she stole. Imagine if you encounter one of the psychos that we bump into from time to time in this hobby who gets pissed off because you asked for a deal. Instead of going off on you, she tells you to meet in her hotel parking lot. You're waiting for the room # and the cops pull up to question you. You're facing a FELONY, and she likely walks away. Why wouldn't she hand over all her text messages? You are a Human trafficker and she's just a poor victim.

The nuttiest thing about this is creating felons out of people that were probably productive members of society. Felons have a hard time getting jobs, and they usually get fired while facing the prosecution. They can't get or keep vocational licenses and certifications. What about a sugar daddy arrangement that ends before the woman wants it to end? Is she going to threaten you with this? Yikes.

**Trans Am Guy** · 07-04-24 00:10

Originally Posted by MmceStep [View Original Post]

Several here have mentioned it as a good option. The only thing that's held me back is its linkage to my friends / connections on the meta platforms. I would hate for people in my vanilla life to see anything about my activity. Did you create a fake profile? If so, does it put women on guard that it's an obviously fake profile? I have way more questions, but maybe you can give this dumbass an overview? Thanks.

It doesn't link anything to your general profile. Totally anonymous.

**FSmith9009** · 07-03-24 20:03

Originally Posted by Miay78 [View Original Post]

She did end up reaching out again and apologized through a text. I just didn't see the message until today. Said she apologized and didn't mean for things to go that way. I have only seen her once before and it was a wonderful time so I'm struggling with if I should give her a second chance.

She should make it up to you.

**BBCjr** · 07-03-24 18:48

Originally Posted by MmceStep [View Original Post]

Several here have mentioned it as a good option. The only thing that's held me back is its linkage to my friends / connections on the meta platforms. I would hate for people in my vanilla life to see anything about my activity. Did you create a fake profile? If so, does it put women on guard that it's an obviously fake profile? I have way more questions, but maybe you can give this dumbass an overview? Thanks.

Thats a screenshot in what facebook says before joining.