Arrangement Reports

**DotJohn** · 03-30-24 18:32

Originally Posted by HershelS [View Original Post]

Do you guys put things like net worth over 100 million and annual salary over 1 million to score more hits and more attention on Seeking?

I used to mess around with that and one not-too-smart girl asked if that was really what I make. Perhaps I'm better looking / don't give myself enough credit LMAO.

**MongolMonger** · 03-30-24 18:21

In need of some advice, has anyone successfully reconnected with an old SB? I was seeing someone great for a few months a little over year ago, everything was going well we would meet every other week for a few hours. Was really everything I could ask for in a SB. We would normally meet on a given day but eventually one of us had a conflict (can't remember if it was me or her) so we skipped our normal date. We never really talked outside of when we were together and confirm we were still good to meet on a given day. A week or two later I impulsively decided I was spending too much time and money on Seeking and decided to quit, so I deleted my seeking account and burner. Didn't send any kind of text to let her know which in retrospect was dumb. Well a year later and I've dipped my toes back in the game. She had originally deleted her account as well but recently saw she has a new one. How does one go about reconnecting? I don't have any identifying pictures in my profile and of course use a fake name in my profile so even if she stumbles across my profile she probably won't know it is me. Should I just message her on the site and try and explain who I am and ask if she wants to start seeing each other again? Or I still have her number (real number not a burner) so I could skip the site completely and shoot her a text asking if she'd be interested. I feel like that could come off a little weird though and again I was using a burner before so it's not like she would have my contact saved so I'd have to explain who I am. Any advice from more seasoned veterans would be appreciated so I don't screw up this opportunity.

**Dbomb** · 03-30-24 17:44

Originally Posted by HershelS [View Original Post]

Do you guys put things like net worth over 100 million and annual salary over 1 million to score more hits and more attention on Seeking?

There's no point in that, they would quickly and easily figure out it's a lie. I'm honest about my numbers. If it means more rejection, fine. I wouldn't be missing out on much anyway considering how the scene is now.

And if I did have 8 or 9 figures in the bank, I sure as shit would not be trawling Seeking for women. At that level, Seeking would look like how the worst of STG looks to us.

**Pupsnu** · 03-29-24 21:56

Absolutely not. First of all, most women won't believe that level of numbers and those who would are too stupid to have sex with anyways (at least for me). I put up a fairly accurate representation of my salary and net worth. This way women who want $2 K PPM would not respond, and I would not have to waste time talking to someone who has a well-developed GPS. Self-selection is good, saves time, gets to the point. Although I imagine that if you put that your salary is 50 K and net worth is negative, that might turn some people off.

Originally Posted by HershelS [View Original Post]

Do you guys put things like net worth over 100 million and annual salary over 1 million to score more hits and more attention on Seeking?

**HershelS** · 03-29-24 18:48

Do you guys put things like net worth over 100 million and annual salary over 1 million to score more hits and more attention on Seeking?

**SamFlood123** · 03-29-24 18:40

I notice a trend. Typically when a woman classifies her ethnicity as "Mixed", she is anything but. When you see the photo (usually only one) the only mixture you see is between blond and blond. Also see a lot of fake profiles with "divorce" in the status. I think they anticipate most guys will include "mixed" in the search, maybe also divorced. When I see blond hair "mixed" I keep scrolling.

Happy hunting!

**Alchy505** · 03-29-24 18:25

Thought I saw a report on her before but the search turned nothing.

Anyone know what her activities are like behind closed doors?

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...6-802732cad5ff

**DotJohn** · 03-29-24 15:19

Originally Posted by Eternalchaoz [View Original Post]

We are supposed to meet Wednesday so we will see. That's a good catch.

It could possibly be spell checker as mine keeps spelling it Columbia

How did it go?

**Vicdemoan** · 03-29-24 14:53

Originally Posted by ZckBrc [View Original Post]

I take it that this experience was far shorter than 2 hours then? I take it that this is pretty much 350 for 1 pop and done in 15-30 minutes?

Think she was gone within 30 minutes. Maybe it was me and YMMV? I've no plans to find out. This was about a year ago.

**DPark80** · 03-29-24 12:51

Originally Posted by Dbomb [View Original Post]

I ended up seeing her after she decided she was ok coming to my place and for a lower rate. Ended up paying her to leave. She is nice enough, but a disaster in progress. Can't focus. She has several habits, openly admitted she's on Seeking to fund those habits. She was on her phone messaging guys on the site, scheduling meetings, etc. Had 2 more lined up after me. She's higher volume than Spinal Tap. Showed me a bad bruise which she claimed was caused by another guy on SA beating her in a BDSM scenario which went too far and he wouldn't stop.

A serendipitous robo call gave me an out. I pretended it was an urgent work problem. She was cool with it and I gave her something for her time and sent her on her way. Avoid.

Hey, thanks for the review! I've been messaging with her on snapchat. Was planning on seeing her but I might pass, not looking to see someone so high volume.

**Dbomb** · 03-29-24 11:12

Originally Posted by Dbomb [View Original Post]

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...0-a9575eb5c91f

In Waukegan. Claims she's an insomniac and has a hectic schedule because of it, and loves weed. After talking to her, I can believe both. She can't remember what was discussed shortly beforehand. Inconsistent and incomplete responses. We agreed on a number and what her limits were, a while later she wanted substantially more. Can't host, wants to get a room (on you.) Says she can only do an hour or so. BBFS. Cip if you cover a plan b for her too. It would be over five Benjamins and I won't drop that for one hour.

If those pics are real, she looks great. She just doesn't seem reliable enough, and I'm tired. She is not trans, so I don't know why she has those tags in her profile but whatever.

I ended up seeing her after she decided she was ok coming to my place and for a lower rate. Ended up paying her to leave. She is nice enough, but a disaster in progress. Can't focus. She has several habits, openly admitted she's on Seeking to fund those habits. She was on her phone messaging guys on the site, scheduling meetings, etc. Had 2 more lined up after me. She's higher volume than Spinal Tap. Showed me a bad bruise which she claimed was caused by another guy on SA beating her in a BDSM scenario which went too far and he wouldn't stop.

A serendipitous robo call gave me an out. I pretended it was an urgent work problem. She was cool with it and I gave her something for her time and sent her on her way. Avoid.

**DotJohn** · 03-29-24 09:18

Originally Posted by Piper2005 [View Original Post]

She has been around for a while. Pics are accurate. When I saw her, insisted on CFS, but BBBJ. It was average. Biggest problem is that she can be flaky and ghost. Tried to meet up with her 2 other times, ghosted me both times so I stopped trying.

Trying to find her previous profile and read a bit more. Anyone?

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...5-98edad0c1664

**Pau Ford** · 03-28-24 09:39

You can't draw conclusions like that based on join date.

A lot of girls actually ARE pro's but they create new profiles every couple months. You can't conclude a pro is now a non pro just b / c join date was 2 months ago. A lot of girls joined years ago but never really did anything with the site. Then they came back years later and logged back in. Join date is 5 years ago but they've never met a single person on the site, def not a pro.

So take join date with a grain of salt its not usually an accurate barometer.

Originally Posted by BillUnderwood [View Original Post]

Been on the site since 2019, have to suggest she is pro caliber at this point.