NoVA SugarBabies

[JonFisher]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

She is a waste of time and effort. Gives different responses to diff people at diff times. The last one I got was quote "It starts with an initial meeting where you are not allowed to touch me. That chance to woo me costs $300."

[FogHorn1]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

She's certainly open about her life right? "I'm broke and lonely" after pissing away her life savings attempting to be a day trader. LOL Jeez!

In any case, I do recognize the pic of her holding the camera, but I don't remember seeing any specific reports on her.

[SRH59]

I have a photo of me (a real one) that is still sanitized, w / dots on the face. It was to avoid facial rec. I have used it as the basis for search on facecheck before. At some times, I have gotten hits, and I have asked them to remove the hits. So I did supply them w / a 'real' pic of me, but as I said, sanitized. They claim that they delete the pic supplied and don't keep any records. I guess I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.

That is a photo I will send to POTs once I have spoken to them by phone and I think meeting them is possible. Before that, the photos I have on the seeking site are of someone who sorta looks like me, but they are also cut off as if they are me, to give the impression I am trying to stay under the radar (and also avoid them getting mad that I gave them fake pix).

Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I did do the opt out on pimyes, not as a member, and didn't have to upload a picture. I recall just clicking on the hit that came up (linkedin) and they removed it from the search. Oddly, Facecheck didn't hit on that same picture buyt pimeyes did.

I'll share a picture in the seeking chats if I trust the girl. But still one of those ridiculous mirror selfies hiding my face a bit (I'm too old for this shit, LOL). I fully believe sharing a real picture pays off with legit SBs, but it only takes one bad actor to level a world of regret on you.

Got to get some type of check going. While it is so painfully obvious to spot the 12 hour old hot chick profiles, the comfort gained by facecheck (when it was free) is sorely missed.

[Rudy Wellz]

She's been on for 2 years and maybe had a previous profile. Searched, but no reports. Spoke to her a couple of weeks ago and got the high volume vibes. Any intel?

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-229c12894ac0

[FarFarAway]

I think at least part of the rationale behind uploading your own photo is that it gives you an opportunity to opt out of their search function, which could be helpful. At that point, I suppose it's a question of how much do you trust them to be not-scumbags?

I have a photo of me (a real one) that is still sanitized, w / dots on the face. It was to avoid facial rec. I have used it as the basis for search on facecheck before. At some times, I have gotten hits, and I have asked them to remove the hits. So I did supply them w / a 'real' pic of me, but as I said, sanitized. They claim that they delete the pic supplied and don't keep any records. I guess I am inclined to give them the benefit of the doubt.

That is a photo I will send to POTs once I have spoken to them by phone and I think meeting them is possible. Before that, the photos I have on the seeking site are of someone who sorta looks like me, but they are also cut off as if they are me, to give the impression I am trying to stay under the radar (and also avoid them getting mad that I gave them fake pix).

[Itfcd]

Does pimeyes make you upload a picture of yourself to get a membership? I got a prompt for that. I also tried to use an amex gift card to pay but it rejected it. I'm wondering if you can cancel at a later point without having them keep charging.

I think at least part of the rationale behind uploading your own photo is that it gives you an opportunity to opt out of their search function, which could be helpful. At that point, I suppose it's a question of how much do you trust them to be not-scumbags?

[FogHorn1]

Does pimeyes make you upload a picture of yourself to get a membership? I got a prompt for that. I also tried to use an amex gift card to pay but it rejected it. I'm wondering if you can cancel at a later point without having them keep charging.

No, I never had to upload a pic. And you can cancel anytime before the next month rebill.

[SRH59]

I have been using pimeyes for even the normal dating app girls. I find it works really well, and for $29 a month it's saved me from wasting my time on more than one occasion.

Does pimeyes make you upload a picture of yourself to get a membership? I got a prompt for that. I also tried to use an amex gift card to pay but it rejected it. I'm wondering if you can cancel at a later point without having them keep charging.

[TheBarbarian]

I suspect she is an escort. Never has a sugar baby set a time limit (90 min in your case). Usually it's just a date and goes on until it naturally ends. I always say I want to be intimate two times per meet so however long that takes, usually a few hours. Time limits should be a huge flag.

I set the time limit. During the conversation I mention an hour and half is all I would require.

[FogHorn1]

Now that facecheck. ID is gone to bitcoin, what do you all use?

Is facecheck still the best paid option or is there something else?

I have been using pimeyes for even the normal dating app girls. I find it works really well, and for $29 a month it's saved me from wasting my time on more than one occasion.

[Tophat31]

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...5-71ddfdf12a87

Quoted $500. Got her down to $350 for 90 min BBBJ / CFS.

Looks like her pictures however I would say noticeably better in person.

Dressed casual / revealed an unexpecting body underneath. Small breast but in good condition. With very toned thighs and the best ass I've seen off seeking. Nice natural bubble.

BBBJ was solid but didn't have me on edge ready to pop.

The only negative was vagina was a bit sour, I caught a whiff while fooling around.

If this hadn't occurred, I'd recommend or see her again but I think I'll have to pass.

I suspect she is an escort. Never has a sugar baby set a time limit (90 min in your case). Usually it's just a date and goes on until it naturally ends. I always say I want to be intimate two times per meet so however long that takes, usually a few hours. Time limits should be a huge flag.

[TopGun9]

Is it a violation of TOS to have two accounts? I wasn't aware of that. I have had my two, for some time. Since email is the basis of the login, yep, you have to have two, however, it allows me to use an email alias. I just have to pay attention to using the correct address if I were to email them about any problem.

I presume you got an email from them saying they suspended you and why?

I don't know if they're able to track IPs. But I think here's what happened.

I used my primary account, upgraded to premium, then for some reason it as for I'd verification. So I left this account alone.

Then I used my backup account, upgraded to premium using the same credit card. They then suspend this account saying I can not have multiple account on SA.

I supposed I probably made the mistake of using the same credit card on both accounts.

[SonChi]

To give you an idea of the type of hoodlums trying to ask for gas money on SA. Went to whatsapp to share photos. Probably didn't realize I had telegram which looks to be his real photos.

That is wild. Scammers are everywhere. Be diligent brothers. RTFF and go see girls that others have posted on. Make them popular so they stay. Blazing new paths is now officially overrated to me.

[TheBarbarian]

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...5-71ddfdf12a87

Quoted $500. Got her down to $350 for 90 min BBBJ / CFS.

Looks like her pictures however I would say noticeably better in person.

Dressed casual / revealed an unexpecting body underneath. Small breast but in good condition. With very toned thighs and the best ass I've seen off seeking. Nice natural bubble.

BBBJ was solid but didn't have me on edge ready to pop.

The only negative was vagina was a bit sour, I caught a whiff while fooling around.

If this hadn't occurred, I'd recommend or see her again but I think I'll have to pass.

[Kpop1]

To give you an idea of the type of hoodlums trying to ask for gas money on SA. Went to whatsapp to share photos. Probably didn't realize I had telegram which looks to be his real photos.