Thread: Hot Young Asian Girls
+
Add Report
Results 3,421 to 3,435 of 10486
-
02-23-24 00:01 #7066Senior Member

Posts: 801Shani
People are actually arguing about whether Shani is hot or not? Damn, some of those dudes must have super high expectations. I would say Shani is (objectively speaking) one of the hottest k-girls working in LA right now. I often joke with her that she could pass for 19 or 20, but I think she actually could. Her body is insane. I'd guess she is no older than 25 or 26. And if you like sexy little spinners, she is the classic definition of a spinner. Of course, if you prefer a 5'8' 120 lbs runway model. OK, then Shani isn't your type. But good luck finding a 5'8" k-girl. Not many of those in town.
Originally Posted by PogeyBait
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 22:38 #7065Senior Member

Posts: 1249LOL. Tulip = Suzy = Hari. Service and appearance is good IMO.
Originally Posted by BuildingGuy
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 22:30 #7064Senior Member

Posts: 178Just saw her. She starts a bit more transactional because she is super sensitive to touch. My hands were cold from the outside weather, and she reacted sharply when I touched her. Also likes whole handed touch, not fingertips, which tend to tickle her.
Originally Posted by BuildingGuy
[View Original Post]
No FIV. But she responds very well to DATY.
She takes a hard pounding well too, so the only time she told me to slow down was when she said she was cumming.
I'll probably repeat. Her MMs are gorgeous and her booty, though not firm, is plump and falls perfectly into place. I'd say it's a bit bigger than Ari's.
-
02-22-24 21:55 #7063Senior Member

Posts: 302Only saw Shani
I've seen Shani, not the other two. Fake pics but pretty imo. Some mongers on the PLEASER thread are having a debate on her hotness but she's definitely younger than most providers on an extensive roster. Decent BBBJ but no BBFS so be aware before making the appointment.
Originally Posted by Mmmmm00
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 19:41 #7062Senior Member

Posts: 319Tulip
I have not seen Tulip but a reliable booker advised me to not book her because of bad service.
Originally Posted by Mmmmm00
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 17:36 #7061Senior Member

Posts: 174Shani v Isabel v Tulip
With Elle missing in action, who would you recommend to hold me over?
-
02-22-24 17:31 #7060Senior Member

Posts: 174Elle
Why shouldn't we expect Elle back soon? Do you have any intel or just speculating?
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 15:51 #7059Senior Member

Posts: 530Celine & Elle
As expected and as I told you guys, Cakdolls took down the ad for Celine & Elle.
Originally Posted by JohnHada
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 13:50 #7058Senior Member

Posts: 147Princess
Does anyone have any information about Princess from https://www.candygirlla.com/?.
-
02-22-24 12:48 #7057Senior Member

Posts: 530Celine and elle
Their pictures are up on cakd but they are not avail.
Last time celine's pics were up with on vacation, and when I asked booker, she said it was mistake and put it down.
Did you hear otherwise, that they are both avail soon?
Originally Posted by Taliesin92
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 08:32 #7056Senior Member

Posts: 801Celine is back
Glad to hear it! Wanted to see her last time around, but she was always booked up. Are her pics on the CAKolls site real, or fairly representative, or completely fake?
Originally Posted by Lapmusa
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 08:04 #7055Senior Member

Posts: 748Add me to the list as well.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
02-22-24 01:26 #7054Senior Member

Posts: 3475I wanted to see Elle again too but don't expect her anytime soon.
Originally Posted by RickJamesB
[View Original Post]
-
02-21-24 23:44 #7053Senior Member

Posts: 157Elle
Who else got a hard on seeing Elle's name on the CAK website? Excited for when she's off vacation.
-
02-21-24 15:53 #7052Senior Member

Posts: 99Celine is back
Just saw Celine was listed on cakdolls website. Glad to see a HYA is back. Hope more HYAs come to LA!










Reply With Quote








