Sugarbabies?

[Moszlak01]

Anyone? She sent me a couple pictures that were intriguing. Since she's been on for a few years does anyone have intel on meeting up with her?

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...a-2ba2a11a460c#.

[Todd Cincy]

This girl.

https://members.seeking.com/member/0...5-c58ddecd09a7

Is also this girl.

https://tryst.link/escort/azrealle

Her Seeking profile dates back to 2014, and the main pic is relatively flattering. But based on some other photos of her, I believe it's about 10 years old. I've seen later photos in which her appearance is a lot rougher and a somewhat heavier.

Do a M&G before you agree to anything.

[BamBam]

This is another with GPS. She is very hot. I found her IG but not any PII. She engaged and chatted with me. However she is firm at wanting $3-4 K per month based on 2-4 meetings a month. I am guessing she wants something like $800-1000 per meet and would be okay with a per meet offer at that level. You high rollers should go for it!

BAM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/2...1-897e82ae41b2

[Decatur21]

Super annoying. We weren't able to schedule a meet but she was still texting me begging.

Yea, quit talking to her early on. She kept messaging me from different numbers so I didn't know it was her. Probably 4 numbers in all. Very creepy.

[Moszlak01]

The ones that asks all the basic questions are annoying. She wanted to sell me pics and vid's. I did get a preview of her tits. If they are actually hers. Not bad but I do t plan on pursuing any more.

Super annoying. We weren't able to schedule a meet but she was still texting me begging.

[Member #6847]

https://members.seeking.com/member/5...a-ccba3bda7ca3

Doesn't even try to hide the grift.

[Bbbloo]

https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-8ac2e5b47843

Any intel on this one? Seems I saw her on the site before, but was under a different profile. Feel free to dm me.

Super annoying. We weren't able to schedule a meet but she was still texting me begging.

[Bbbloo]

Messaged with her in November. Wanted MnG fee. Determined she was a time water and money grabber not real SB. Passed. YMMV. She's also on Bumble as Kate

Yeah she wants a $$ meet and greet.

[RockaBillyRiot]

I've been smacking these unruly bitches with the ban-hammer as of late.

There's been an inordinate number of broads that want to waste time.

I don't get it.

[Cincyfunguy]

Those pictures are of "Veronica. " If that really is the same girl and not someone using her pictures, then she really does look good IRL. But, she's not recommended. Kind of a dud when you meet her, and she's very annoying and aggressive on text.

I agree totally with Ginzo. Better to avoid.

[WanderingAbout]

I chatted with her a few years ago when she was using the Sweetcheeks profile. She was asking the same then. I am pretty certain she is just a rinser and will never meet for intimacy.
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...9febaa89650633
https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-e30ea6e380a2
BAM.

Messaged with her in November. Wanted MnG fee. Determined she was a time water and money grabber not real SB. Passed. YMMV. She's also on Bumble as Kate

[JoeThighsMan]

In the current Seeking database within 60 miles of Cincinnati there are:
3558= Sugar baby's total of which
676= Average girls.
1245= Slim and Athletic girls.
1637= Curvy, Full figure, and Heavy Set girls.
With ages of
18-20= 267.
21-25= 1317.
26-30= 901.
31-35= 512.
36-40= 249.
41-50= 249.
50+= 100.
There's a +37 in age results over weight for some reason lol

God damn! Nearly 50% are overweight / BBW?

I love America 🤮.

[WanderingAbout]

In the current Seeking database within 60 miles of Cincinnati there are:
3558= Sugar baby's total of which
676= Average girls.
1245= Slim and Athletic girls.
1637= Curvy, Full figure, and Heavy Set girls.
With ages of
18-20= 267.
21-25= 1317.
26-30= 901.
31-35= 512.
36-40= 249.
41-50= 249.
50+= 100.
There's a +37 in age results over weight for some reason lol

[BamBam]

She shares that her name is Kate. She was also on SA as Sweetcheeksoxox several years ago. She claims she is willing to do PPM for $500 but wants $200 at the first MnG. She will not go directly to a private meeting. I chatted with her a few years ago when she was using the Sweetcheeks profile. She was asking the same then. I am pretty certain she is just a rinser and will never meet for intimacy.

I think she has blocked me on SA but I will include a link there even though it no longer works for me. Has anyone had any contact with her? Results? I have PII / SM to share for contributing seniors.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...9febaa89650633

https://members.seeking.com/member/7...b-e30ea6e380a2

BAM.

[Todd Cincy]

Birthrates started dropping off big time in the late 90's and early 2000's. Th reason why Seeking was such a gold mine from 2010-2017 was because there were alot more millenial women than there are gen Z girls.

The millenials are aging out of their looks / settling down (to some extent) so that is why things are kind of simmering off. Seeking is essentially a MILF hunter site now and going forward things are going to be even worse due to the massive drop off in birthrates.

Its depressing but if you were an older gen X or a boomer who was in this sport in the 90's, 00's and 10's consider yourself lucky. Its legit going to be a barren wasteland by the end of this decade and your only real hope of having any sort of decent variety is to expand your search radius or be able to travel.

The only way Gen Z girls are going come to reality is when they age out of their cam girl looks or we have a systemic societal collapse. I dont think a depression is enough to shake it

I'm an older GenXer (born in the late 1960's). I agree that the Millennial SBs (aka "Generation Why Not") made the best SBs.

Between 2010 and 2017, there were a lot of quality young women on Seeking, most born between 1985 and 1996.

In 2024, though, most of the good ones from that crowd have married and settled down, or simply found careers that got them out of sugaring.

But there was more to the 2010's boom than birthrates. The whole sugar dating concept got a big boost in the media between 2009 and 2014 or so, much like that horrible Only Fools site is getting boosted in the media now.

Also, the unemployment rate hit 9. 9 percent in 2009. I was meeting a lot of college seniors from UC, Miami, and NKU who weren't getting jobs. For the past few years, the big companies have been swooping up those same students. (The unemployment rate is currently 3. 7 percent.).

Like so many of you, I don't like the Gen Z girls nearly as much.

In my experience, they are hyper-cautious and like to stay in their rooms.

Some of this can be blamed on the lockdowns of the pandemic period, which were so much of their formative years. But the blame can also be placed on their uptight Gen X parents (many of my friends) who helicopter-parented them.

The Millennials, by contrast, were largely raised by devil-may-care Boomers.

The Gen Z girls (at least the ones on Seeking) are a lot fatter as a group.

That all said, I want to leave you guys with a ray of hope. So here goes.

I used to dabble in the hobby in the early 2000's. I was in my 30's then. Most of the providers in those days were younger Gen Xers, often just a few years younger than me.

The girl market of the early 00's was not so great. At that time, the market looked a lot like it does now: all of the offerings were fat, rough, or way too expensive.

But in mid-2008, things took off, when the cash-hungry Millennial girls came on board. At first, that meant more high-quality, reasonably priced escorts. Then Seeking Arrangement exploded a few years later, between 2010 and 2012.

That's why I'm mostly holding on to my money until the supply situation changes. (The big problem now, on Seeking and elsewhere, is too many thirsty guys chasing too few quality girls.).

But what goes around, comes around. I've seen it happen before.