Rubrankings.com
Ferrant Lax Mexico City
High Class Companions
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms

Thread: Sugarbabies?

+ Add Report
Page 58 of 610 FirstFirst ... 8 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 108 158 558 ... LastLast
Results 856 to 870 of 9143
This blog is moderated by MisforMaster
  1. #8288

    Gerontocracy

    Quote Originally Posted by LolBoat  [View Original Post]
    Birthrates started dropping off big time in the late 90's and early 2000's. Th reason why Seeking was such a gold mine from 2010-2017 was because there were alot more millenial women than there are gen Z girls.
    It looks like birthrates hit peaks in 1990 and 2007. So, maybe we'll get another spike in SBs around 2027 or so! Overall, the trendline is gradually moving down tho, which is exactly what you get when you live in a gerontocracy like the US.

  2. #8287
    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    Before Covid and the rate inflation, I used to have a lot of success with coeds in the 21-24 age range. Lately, the coeds seemed to have dried up. Could be me, could be the effect of O-F or or it could be natural evolution. In any case, I now search 18-35 while being serious about working those between 20-30 and having the most success in the 24-28 range. I deviate from time-to-time if the woman looks interesting but those often end up as one-off. My allowance offer is in the 200-400/ week range but I will deviate up to 500 for someone special.

    BAM.
    Birthrates started dropping off big time in the late 90's and early 2000's. Th reason why Seeking was such a gold mine from 2010-2017 was because there were alot more millenial women than there are gen Z girls.

    The millenials are aging out of their looks / settling down (to some extent) so that is why things are kind of simmering off. Seeking is essentially a MILF hunter site now and going forward things are going to be even worse due to the massive drop off in birthrates.

    Its depressing but if you were an older gen X or a boomer who was in this sport in the 90's, 00's and 10's consider yourself lucky. Its legit going to be a barren wasteland by the end of this decade and your only real hope of having any sort of decent variety is to expand your search radius or be able to travel.

    The only way Gen Z girls are going come to reality is when they age out of their cam girl looks or we have a systemic societal collapse. I dont think a depression is enough to shake it

  3. #8286

    Eaxctly. Go lecture some other poor bastard

    Good observations and I am in a similar spot to you, surf often and partake less. I am very picky and as we all know, things are very different than 5 or 6 years ago. And I am guessing the site has probably saved more marriages than it has destroyed?

    I once had a SB I met on the road post a similar sentiment in her profile about not wanting to meet with married SD's. So we met for a drink one thing led to another and we wound up having a wonderful time together. It actually turned out to be maybe my best encounter ever from the site. Moral of the story, ignore what they say in their profile. They are all crazy in some way. If they need sugar and you hit them up at the right time, your in!

    And if "cheaters disgust her" why the hell is she on the site? The last thing I need is a SB lecturing me on who I should sleep with. And no worries, you are not going to break up my marriage!!

    Quote Originally Posted by AlphaTek1  [View Original Post]
    Long time lurker on this thread (participate in others) and don't have the cashflow to provide a monthly allowance, maybe a ppm, but I love to windowshop.

    I do love her profile though: "I have no interest on being the basis of a marriage ending. Cheaters absolutely disgust me. So if your (sic) married or currently in a relationship then don't waste your time. ".

    I'd guestimate that 95% of us are in a relationship and are here looking to get what we don't at home. I don't consider it cheating when my SO won't do something I want or even go out and have fun. I'm basically in a business relationship raising our family, and I get some benefits here and there, but nothing like I want so I go get it somewhere else. I love it when a chick selling her pussy on the internet judges us for buying it.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...dWlkZS5ubC8%3D

  4. #8285
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginzo666  [View Original Post]
    Her tits are enormous!
    Her profile is gone.

  5. #8284

    Who TF do they think is shopping?

    Quote Originally Posted by WarlockKy  [View Original Post]
    A lot of conversation starts and stops, PMs on the sites that die off and then start back up a month of so later.

    My guess is she gets one on the line and then goes looking again when he moves on.

    Never been able to get her to text.
    Long time lurker on this thread (participate in others) and don't have the cashflow to provide a monthly allowance, maybe a ppm, but I love to windowshop.

    I do love her profile though: "I have no interest on being the basis of a marriage ending. Cheaters absolutely disgust me. So if your (sic) married or currently in a relationship then don't waste your time. ".

    I'd guestimate that 95% of us are in a relationship and are here looking to get what we don't at home. I don't consider it cheating when my SO won't do something I want or even go out and have fun. I'm basically in a business relationship raising our family, and I get some benefits here and there, but nothing like I want so I go get it somewhere else. I love it when a chick selling her pussy on the internet judges us for buying it.

    https://members.seeking.com/member/7...dWlkZS5ubC8%3D

  6. #8283

    Macy

    Quote Originally Posted by JoeThighsMan  [View Original Post]
    Maybe she was in love with you? Haha!

    She looks to have fun tits-are they as big as they seem to be in pictures?
    Her tits are enormous!

  7. #8282
    Quote Originally Posted by Ginzo666  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/2...9-0a7fa1e38633

    If you honestly believe this chick doesn't fuck on the first meet, I got a bridge to sell you. I met this girl 2 x in 2022. Although the "performances" were good, she got nasty with me for no reason at all. I don't recommend.
    Maybe she was in love with you? Haha!

    She looks to have fun tits-are they as big as they seem to be in pictures?

  8. #8281

    Macy28

    https://members.seeking.com/member/2...9-0a7fa1e38633

    If you honestly believe this chick doesn't fuck on the first meet, I got a bridge to sell you. I met this girl 2 x in 2022. Although the "performances" were good, she got nasty with me for no reason at all. I don't recommend.

  9. #8280
    Quote Originally Posted by SixtyNineX10  [View Original Post]
    Zoey escorts. You can find her ad on Tryst.

  10. #8279

    Zoeytonsoffun and EssenceOfEllie


  11. #8278

    Veronica

    Quote Originally Posted by SixtyNineX10  [View Original Post]
    https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-8ac2e5b47843

    Any intel on this one? Seems I saw her on the site before, but was under a different profile. Feel free to dm me.
    Those pictures are of "Veronica. " If that really is the same girl and not someone using her pictures, then she really does look good IRL. But, she's not recommended. Kind of a dud when you meet her, and she's very annoying and aggressive on text.

  12. #8277

    SweetArtist808

    https://members.seeking.com/member/6...8-8ac2e5b47843

    Any intel on this one? Seems I saw her on the site before, but was under a different profile. Feel free to dm me.

  13. #8276
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2645
    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    Lately, the coeds seemed to have dried up. Could be me, could be the effect of O-F or or it could be natural evolution.BAM.
    Oh, it's definitely the effect of O-F. Those people who are looking for "online only" arrangements. Well, that's O-F. O-F can provide them income, without ever having to meet. They can setup their accounts to NOT come up in their local areas so the odds of anyone they know seeing them is considerably decreased. 100 guys paying $20/ month is $2000/ mo without ever having to go out to meet someone for dinner. Add the custom special requests, as a sudar daddy is apt to do, and it's a tidy sum without having to suck a single cock. They don't even have to have that awkward conversation of why they can't meet yet; no BS of "until trust is established and I am comfortable".

    O-F is defintely the online only sugar bowl for mass consumerasim.

  14. #8275

    Seeking

    Quote Originally Posted by BamBam  [View Original Post]
    Before Covid and the rate inflation, I used to have a lot of success with coeds in the 21-24 age range. Lately, the coeds seemed to have dried up. Could be me, could be the effect of O-F or or it could be natural evolution. In any case, I now search 18-35 while being serious about working those between 20-30 and having the most success in the 24-28 range. I deviate from time-to-time if the woman looks interesting but those often end up as one-off. My allowance offer is in the 200-400/ week range but I will deviate up to 500 for someone special.

    BAM.
    I deleted my paid SA account a few months back for several reasons. I only have a burner account now. The "talent" in our area still seems exceptionally weak. So many fatties, GPS, delusional grannies, etc. I think Todd is probably right: We're going to need a recession to shake things up and refresh the talent pool. These mid girls that want $500 ppm and can't host can lick my not wiped rectum. I'm not feeding that rat.

    As to what defines a proper SB to me, I think 20-25 is the sweet spot for me. I'm still in my mid-40's. If I were older, that range may shift up a bit. For whatever reason, the women in their 30's on SA seem to be nearly universally batshit crazy.

  15. #8274

    Age Window +

    Good Question. Slim, Athletic, maybe Average in size. Age range 18 to 32. After this age the women tend to have family obligations. Maybe older if cute and fit. Personality is a plus. Social drinking okay. No Drugs beyond Pot or MILFS, Drama, GPS, Findom, etc.

    Quote Originally Posted by DNut  [View Original Post]
    So I'm curious. What age group would you consider to be a sugar baby, and at what point is that just dating? For me, if I ever decided to delve into the sugar bowl, the lady would have to be in their early to mid 20's. Late 20's to early 30's would be like hooking up with a younger friend. Mid 30's on up is just like regular dating; someone I wouldn't feel the slightest bit awkward introducing to my friends and family as someone I am seeing. That's just me. Everyone's situation is different. What's your window?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape