Thread: Asian Providers
+
Add Report
Results 2,866 to 2,880 of 8798
-
01-19-24 17:01 #5933Banned Member

Posts: 770Essie
Just to echo this.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
I like Essie, she's definitely a service queen with her DT and tight pussy. Def submissive and dtf.
Definitely on older and plain side to me (plus she often doesn't wear a lot or almost any makeup) but I've definitely seen her a good amount for the oral action and very tight pussy.
Beware if you're a magnum she might not DT you as well, she's not really on Lovelyn or Diva level there to just gobble you with no gag reflex. Even with just decent chemistry between me and her, she's a strong recommend for any service seeking gentlemen.
-
01-19-24 14:44 #5932Regular Member

Posts: 13Naomi
Had to write this review as Naomi is one of my ATF. I saw her yesterday and I had a great session with her. She looks fantastic, nice big Ds or DDs that look and feel natural. She has a pretty face and a nice butt. After I get in, we exchange pleasantries and get down to business. She's very thorough in the shower, but there's no preview. After drying off, she gets down for a BBBJ and BLS which she's fantastic at. She's a big kisser (DFK) throughout the session. For round 1, he let's me explode in her mouth. After some cuddling and small talk we get down for round 2. Her on top is an amazing site. The boobs bouncing was amazing. She's had the perfect body for sex. I finished and we chatted for a bit. I donated extra for a 3rd time and after doggie and side Mish I finished for a 3rd time. This girl is amazing and it's a shame she's only here for a couple more days. I might even see her again before she leaves.
-
01-17-24 23:22 #5931Senior Member

Posts: 45Mailbox Gull
Yo tried to send you my experience with the process via PM. Your mailbox is full.
Originally Posted by Tijuaniko
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 23:05 #5930Senior Member

Posts: 2537Essie LG
I dug up my review when I saw her a couple years ago in the Bay. If only still had the time to write reviews like this *sigh* I'll leave that to you young bucks.
Originally Posted by SsStuntCock
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 22:54 #5929Senior Member

Posts: 2537Essie LG
One of my best lays of 2022. I personally didn't think she was on the older side -at least not in a bad way- so I was a little surprised to read others make that remark. But I suppose if you only see early-20 somethings then you may want to think twice. Still, she's petite, submissive and DTF. That we clicked sexually made for a mutually beneficial experience. Find her at TER: 372011.
-
01-17-24 16:16 #5928Senior Member

Posts: 785Multiple K-orgs say upfront that if you have several recent positive network ratings on HX, that's the best way. Otherwise, you're a 'nobody' that nobody knows and can't even vouch for. That's why there's a process for vetting completely new people. Some people are flakes and HX weeds those out.
Originally Posted by Tijuaniko
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 14:50 #5927Senior Member

Posts: 468Tiffany at FEC (Cakdolls)
I see a new girl at FEC, image search shows she was in Boston recently and has Terr ID of 380255. I have. It seen her, but thought I would pass this along to anyone thinking about it. Reviews indicate a bit of a late 30's MILFy vibe, but I don't have full access and only can read the brief review blurbs.
-
01-17-24 02:59 #5926Senior Member

Posts: 283Thanks
Thanks for sharing, SirBishop. Your advice is always appreciated.
Originally Posted by SirBishop
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 01:43 #5925Banned Member

Posts: 904TJ I'm going to tell you that vetting is always a YMMV process. Keep a good relationship with the K-orgs and word about you is shared. I was able to bypass the vetting process having been a monger for over 20 years with no complaints from the girls or agencies. So, that question from the booker to me never came up. But your question is a valid one and be prepared with your alternate ego IDs.
Originally Posted by Tijuaniko
[View Original Post]
-
01-17-24 00:43 #5924Senior Member

Posts: 283LollyGirls Question for Sir Bishop
Thanks for sharing your experience, Sir Bishop. Would you mind sharing what if any vetting process this agency has for clients? Also, do they offer incall and if so, where?
Originally Posted by SirBishop
[View Original Post]
Thanks in advance.
- TJNiko.
-
01-16-24 23:09 #5923Banned Member

Posts: 3075Yeah, she has great reviews. Thank you, Sir!
Originally Posted by DRaj123
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-24 19:59 #5922Banned Member

Posts: 415Her ter I'd is TER I'd: 384595.
Originally Posted by RChangDatyKing
[View Original Post]
Pretty good ratings all above 8.
-
01-16-24 19:47 #5921Banned Member

Posts: 770You couldn't tell from my write-up of Ginna, which mentions Ginna six times that its a review of Ginna?
Originally Posted by TrustyHairlip
[View Original Post]
I did say they are using Ginnas photos for Ellie. I did provide a ter I'd link.
Have you missed that part?
I wanted to include the entire review, because I believe in public evaluations. And when it's someone I rated very low, I want to be able to tell the guys ASAP.
It's very simple. In all my experience, when a kgirl uses a picture that another kgirl used, around 95%of time it's her. The other 5% is girls stealing pics without the og girl permission (not cool at all, Mini had it happen to her a couple of months ago) or outrigjt fake insta model pics.
Even though the po says it's not her (LOL imagine trusting POs in anything that might affect their bottom line), there's a good chance it is her. Why would a girl or po take a pic of a girl who wasn't rated highly? I've heard stocky and boxy, which are often regular euphemisms for fat.
And if it is her, do you think I'd want for fellow mongers to fall on a knife?
-
01-16-24 19:31 #5920Senior Member

Posts: 650Agreed. I've seen Kendal / Tatum a few times. There's never been any hint of uncovered action, apart from her amazing BBBJ. She did do p2 p. With that insane body, she doesn't need to offer bare.
Originally Posted by TrustyHairlip
[View Original Post]
-
01-16-24 18:13 #5919Senior Member

Posts: 468Confusing
So you provided a review of Ginna, who is not even visiting San Diego. You could have just said that they are using Ginnas photos for Ellie and provided a link. I couldn't tell from your write up if you were commenting on Ellie at the end or still talking about Ginna. Not trying to be a dick, just was looking for clarification.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



