Korean Agency PSE / BBFS

[FreeWally]

Just FYI, AA here means African American, not Asian American.

Okay makes perfect sense. Yes, it's a problem and unfortunately during screening agencies have warned that some girls (rather than the agency) don't service blacks. There have been many threads on reddit and other forums by SWs explaining their experience and rationale. Even if someone is going to be okay, some girls do not want to take a chance for whatever reason. AA is a bit confusing because I usually hear it mean Asian American, so out of curiosity I checked google and AA means black 2 out of 3 times (Asian 1 out of 3). Huh.

Sorry to hear.

[JackHolly]

Just FYI, AA here means African American, not Asian American.

A few agencies years ago did warn some girls won't service blacks, and "please don't be offended" in their words. I guess there is also some concern that someone fluent in Korean could compromise things by asking girls too many questions. I remember some users said no Koreans for certain agencies - this was 12 years ago, haven't heard it again since so maybe things have changed. But it was never AA. In OC a ton of customers are Asian, it's probably 1/3 of their customers.

[FreeWally]

I'm looking for a way to include more Thai into my script. Mind trading?

The Thai agencies I use are in San Diego. SweetCandies and their various aliases. I've summarized in the SD forum that they have a big pro and con. The pro is with most girls, they use 100% real non-photoshopped photos. Especially the attractive ones. The con is some of their girls, including the most attractive ones, are total amateurs. I actually didn't mind at all, but that is a no go for a lot of guys. To sum it up, she wanted me to eat her pussy and do this and that to her, but was reluctant to suck my dick (she did my second visit). I think I was one of her first customers ever. To a lot of guys, this is total BS and they get really upset about a girl who don't do X Y and Z, especially something that basic. She also didn't get into the shower with me, which I actually prefer. Again some guys flip their lids over this (for example complaining about C-girls and J-girls who don't do what K-girls do).

[Daijiro]

You are kind right, but also review the monger. Because if this person only see providers of one company in the same city is a scam, LTLV is being doing it for a while now.

I'm not really sure what went down with the agency we can't discuss on this forum anymore, but I wonder if any talks about LTLV will get banned as well with some of the fake review.

I haven't used them since Aug / Sept time frame because of the issues I had so it's not a surprise at all LTLV is getting a bad rap now.

[SukijoSeiwaka]

I've used two K-agencies for 11 years. There is no such thing as a high roller, everyone pays the same. Regulars get no priority. I cannot bump anyone, that makes no sense at all.

If you know the logistics of how booking is done, it's super simple. The booker saw the girl's schedule was open and booked her. Then after texting the girl, the girl has some reason she can't do it. So the booker texts back to choose another girl. I won't go into all the facts showing this has to be the case. But for example having made appointments for 11 years very often I book the girl within 30 seconds of my first text. And I can book a girl a day or two in advance when I decide to. So the booker is always booking first, then asking the girl later. In the case when I book a day or two in advance, I know full well the girl can get sick or take a day off and cancel, but that almost never happens.

In all my 11 years of going many times, I've only had a girl had to cancel two times. Several times a girl was late and I was offered an alternative. I was never once offered an inferior girl - actually I was worried about that but much later I found out I was offered a much better girl. Keep in mind this is I think a total of 2 cancels and 3 times late out of 60 visits. I don't like it but it's not crazy either. I've had to cancel myself one time and I'm sure I've been late more than 3 times.

I'm looking for a way to include more Thai into my script. Mind trading?

[Icarus486]

This is pretty ridiculous. My first experiences with K girls were in Japan, which is 99% Asian. Most K girls work in Asian countries, and the biggest concentration of K orgs is in Socal and a lot of customers are Asian. Never had an issue in 11 years.

I believe by AA the previous poster meant African American not Asian American.

[FreeWally]

Koreans in general not fond of the AA male because of past experiences.

This is pretty ridiculous. My first experiences with K girls were in Japan, which is 99% Asian. Most K girls work in Asian countries, and the biggest concentration of K orgs is in Socal and a lot of customers are Asian. Never had an issue in 11 years.

So it is not because of some racism or past experience. Quite the exact opposite. In Japan, some K girls will not service whites or blacks. I don't like it, but it is based on stereotypes of dick size and bad behavior. If you visit the ISG forum it comes up a lot and I've vouched for places that allow whites.

A few agencies years ago did warn some girls won't service blacks, and "please don't be offended" in their words. I guess there is also some concern that someone fluent in Korean could compromise things by asking girls too many questions. I remember some users said no Koreans for certain agencies - this was 12 years ago, haven't heard it again since so maybe things have changed. But it was never AA. In OC a ton of customers are Asian, it's probably 1/3 of their customers.

[FreeWally]

Could have been. There are a ton of reasons why they (bookers) will adjust the schedule. Maybe a regular / high roller called in for a last minute appointment, so you got bumped. Maybe she had a prior session go over-time. Maybe she had a rough session and needed a break for a bit. Just for a few examples.

I would still go with my original comment, tho. A last minute "bait and switch" was probably done to keep a less popular provider booked up. They know you are already in route, and it's too late to make a different appointment through a different agency. The bookers know how to play that game, as well. A new client isn't going to turn down the opportunity to get your foot in the door, so you can't cancel, when they switch girls on you, last minute. They also want to protect their most popular girls, so you are technically being interviewed / re-screened by the bottom tier girls, before they allow you to see the top tier girls.

I've used two K-agencies for 11 years. There is no such thing as a high roller, everyone pays the same. Regulars get no priority. I cannot bump anyone, that makes no sense at all.

If you know the logistics of how booking is done, it's super simple. The booker saw the girl's schedule was open and booked her. Then after texting the girl, the girl has some reason she can't do it. So the booker texts back to choose another girl. I won't go into all the facts showing this has to be the case. But for example having made appointments for 11 years very often I book the girl within 30 seconds of my first text. And I can book a girl a day or two in advance when I decide to. So the booker is always booking first, then asking the girl later. In the case when I book a day or two in advance, I know full well the girl can get sick or take a day off and cancel, but that almost never happens.

In all my 11 years of going many times, I've only had a girl had to cancel two times. Several times a girl was late and I was offered an alternative. I was never once offered an inferior girl - actually I was worried about that but much later I found out I was offered a much better girl. Keep in mind this is I think a total of 2 cancels and 3 times late out of 60 visits. I don't like it but it's not crazy either. I've had to cancel myself one time and I'm sure I've been late more than 3 times.

I'm speaking from San Diego and deal with several bookers. The Thai booker I go through straight up tells me the girl woke up late and isn't answering her phone so can I change girls. The Thai bookers use real photos so I'm hesitant to switch to a girl I don't know (I think in hindsight that girl was actually better because I met her 6 months later). But after 5 minutes of back and forth the girl did answer and I saw her. Two things she pointed out, first I was 15 minutes early to my appointment (I was, but I asked booker if this was okay and they said yes), and second she just woke up and hadn't finished her make up (which was true, and I booked the first appointment of the day). So fair enough, it was the truth there.

In all the times a girl was late or couldn't make it and I found out the real reason, it was quite ordinary. Twice the girl was drinking all night, slept 2 am, and couldn't wake up and get ready in time. She still saw me, just a little late. I cannot vouch for the LV booker in this example, but I'm just saying let's not overthink this.

[KSpacey]

I used to see LA Sera in LA and yes she's a little older but smoking hot, taller, thin and a great time. I've seen her twice since she came to Vegas.

I haven't seen her yet. She look fucking hot. I'll report back.

[SplendidOrchid]

LTLV has been bad for a while. Mainly because the booker is an asshole and the whole bait and switch thing they pull all the time. Even the VAC booker has had some asshole moments which turned me off them.

I now try to stick to independents in Vegas and just use K-agencies in other states.

This is good info. LTLV has gone down bad. Almost all of the TER reviews are fake for this agency. There's girls with an overall higher than 8.5 I've seen that made me want to leave the moment the door opened. I simply can't trust or use them anymore. There are a lot of people here that also post about the girls and imply some are beautiful or hot and it's just not the case. Frankly I (and I guess you, dear reader) are relegated to TOFTT or people who have reviewed that you know.

[ChachoT]

LTLV always points to TER reviews. Which are all 9's and 10's. I skip those and find the lowest review and figure that might be close to truth. Looking at the reviewers. Most will only review Agency girls. It could be just a preference, but looks a little suspicious.

I haven't had a bad experience (yet). Can't go by picture or reviews, basically randomly pick one. Service is about the same routine, bt, shower, etc.

You are kind right, but also review the monger. Because if this person only see providers of one company in the same city is a scam, LTLV is being doing it for a while now.

[Sadako]

LTLV always points to TER reviews. Which are all 9's and 10's. I skip those and find the lowest review and figure that might be close to truth. Looking at the reviewers. Most will only review Agency girls. It could be just a preference, but looks a little suspicious.

I haven't had a bad experience (yet). Can't go by picture or reviews, basically randomly pick one. Service is about the same routine, bt, shower, etc.

This is good info. LTLV has gone down bad. Almost all of the TER reviews are fake for this agency. There's girls with an overall higher than 8.5 I've seen that made me want to leave the moment the door opened. I simply can't trust or use them anymore. There are a lot of people here that also post about the girls and imply some are beautiful or hot and it's just not the case. Frankly I (and I guess you, dear reader) are relegated to TOFTT or people who have reviewed that you know.

[Daijiro]

Was wondering what you meant by "better luck" vs the other. Also not sure what to make of most reviews. Either there's a bunch of retired Playboy Forum writers out there or A I is writing half of them LOL.

Better service mainly. And again since the K-Girls photos majority of the time are not them, I would say luck in the looks department.

[Gopher0254]

Was wondering what you meant by "better luck" vs the other. Also not sure what to make of most reviews. Either there's a bunch of retired Playboy Forum writers out there or A I is writing half of them LOL.

LTLV always points to TER reviews. Which are all 9's and 10's. I skip those and find the lowest review and figure that might be close to truth. Looking at the reviewers. Most will only review Agency girls. It could be just a preference, but looks a little suspicious.

I haven't had a bad experience (yet). Can't go by picture or reviews, basically randomly pick one. Service is about the same routine, bt, shower, etc.

[NobodyZ]

Majority of the K-Girls are not their actual picture. Some look like them, but you can tell they are not as the photos are missing some tattoos.

Go through the regular verification process. And just look up reviews of the girl on review sites.

Was wondering what you meant by "better luck" vs the other. Also not sure what to make of most reviews. Either there's a bunch of retired Playboy Forum writers out there or A I is writing half of them LOL.