Thread: Agency Discussion and Reviews
+
Add Report
Results 6,151 to 6,165 of 10507
-
11-10-23 15:53 #4357Regular Member

Posts: 12Recommendations
Looking for some recs. Any girl with some energy and decent looks. Has anyone seen any girls from BO or APC that hit the spot? There are no reviews for Ami or Sakura on here yet.
-
11-10-23 15:42 #4356Senior Member

Posts: 1947That depends
If you don't have a security clearance, then I wouldn't lose any sleep about it. IMO, it's unlikely that any individual client will get dragged into the criminal case. And, even if you do have a clearance, it's likely that your info is at the bottom of a list of hundreds (thousands?) of other clients. Also, considering how long the affidavit is (60 pages!) it must have taken weeks to draft / finalize / approve, which means the evidence that was gathered to support it would come from an even earlier time. The feds might have continued gathering info, but at some point they run into diminishing returns. No guarantees, of course, but being at the bottom of the list, if you're even on it at all, is better than other scenarios. Of course, if you were a regular, with lots of visits and Zelle transactions, your exposure (no pun intended) will be higher.
Originally Posted by BallerTbakflsl
[View Original Post]
FWIW, most mongers have screwed up at some point. Hopefully it's not too serious and can serve as a learning experience. Trading PII for access to pussy is a risky proposition. Too risky for me, others can decide for themselves.
-
11-10-23 15:11 #4355Senior Member

Posts: 1007I agree and am thinking positive thoughts
Rebrands, new crews, websites and locations should do the trick. No way human trafficking sticks. All the girls I have seen took this as a job like any other, but this one pays a lot more. Thinking this has to do with Politics and elections right now. By next year it's going to be all about Fentanyl crisis.
Originally Posted by BobORama
[View Original Post]
-
11-10-23 15:10 #4354Senior Member

Posts: 1947People on the client list not yet out of the woods
As I posted earlier, while it's unlikely that clients will get caught up in the criminal case, anyone who has a security clearance may still have cause for concern. That means govt employees and contractors, of which I'm sure some are on the client list, are potentially at risk.
Originally Posted by BobORama
[View Original Post]
Two things could happen: A willful or "accidental" release of client info, or a behind the scenes sharing of info with security clearance adjudication agencies. At this point there's no way to know if either of those would happen, but any client who tried to dispute or challenge might have to go public to do so, which carries its own set of problems. This is likely more of a concern in the VA and DC area than it is in MA, but still too early to sound the "all clear" signal.
About the defendants, I've only skimmed the publicly released info, but I've seen charges related to trafficking, money laundering, and identity theft. Activity that might ordinarily fall under state laws gets bumped up to the federal level once it crosses state / intl borders, or otherwise involves interstate commerce (which includes a wide range of things). Hard to say what kind of sentences they're facing as a lot will depend on how much money they're alleged to have laundered. And, while I haven't seen specifics, I wouldn't be surprised to see a denial of bail, or a really high bail amount, based on the possibility of flight risk.
About the alleged "trafficking" victims, the feds will likely roll out a whole host of carrot-and-stick incentives. For example, if any of the women acted as on-site mamasans (holding $, or any kind of management activity), they could be charged as a co-conspirator. Someone like that would be a good target to flip in exchange for a plea deal. For other women, allowing them to remain in the US (carrot) vs deportation (stick) is a likely tactic. Hard to say what any individual woman will do, but it only takes one or two for the "trafficking" charges to stick. And it's also normal practice to not put all of your evidence into a publicly available affidavit. I'm guessing that interviews of clients and providers have already taken place, but that info is not required to be disclosed unless the case goes to trial AND a specific individual is on the witness list.
Lots of stuff yet to unfold. Stay tuned!
P.S. Will new agencies pop up? Absolutely! The world's oldest profession is resilient in the extreme. Run by the same people? Highly risky for them unless they run things from outside the US, in a country where extradition is unlikely. Repeat offenders in the federal system tend to get slammed pretty hard.
-
11-10-23 12:57 #4353Senior Member

Posts: 142Don't worry about it; unless you are a high-profile individual (security clearance, politician, ect), or known bad actors participating in trafficking as suggested in the affidavit the Feds are not going to bother chasing down a Class 1 Misdemeanor (Va state law) for Solicitation or Frequent a Bawdy Place. That maybe passed down to the state level investigators. IMO I doubt very seriously at the state level there are enough resources to investigate and then chase down each regular Joe Shmoe to eventually tie up the court system for a bunch of Class 1 Misdemeanors which is equivalent to a DUI / DWI, as I said that's just my opinion.
Originally Posted by BallerTbakflsl
[View Original Post]
As for a peer to peer payment there is no burden of proof unless they have no evidence for something you may have purchased or more so that you actually showed up at a specific location tying your payment to a time and date.
All that being said just caulk it up to lesson learned, no PII and its cash only.
-
11-10-23 12:23 #4352Senior Member

Posts: 254Yeah she confirmed BEG / BTT later, she thinks the other sites are just laying low for now. Lots of places are just pulling out and laying low until they see what happens. Sucks for guys that can't get to LV or LA, but going to be slim pickings.
Originally Posted by WillGuyMar
[View Original Post]
Last time I talked to her before this was August and she was supposed to start transitioning to helping them with apartments / hotel bookings and interviewing new girls, but I guess that's on hold for now.
-
11-10-23 11:18 #4351Banned Member

Posts: 633Damn that is fast
Yep. My fave NOVA place now has cut back to one gal. Next stop close. Support your local agencies or go backs to jackin off for a while!
Originally Posted by NightHawk1967
[View Original Post]
-
11-10-23 08:58 #4350Senior Member

Posts: 71Of note
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local...cking/3186274/
"But who those sex buyers were remained a mystery on Thursday. Federal authorities were mum on the subject at the news conference, saying that any arrests for the purchase of sex would happen at the state level. ".
That may be a dash of morning comfort for many of you. Steve Descano is the total opposite of a tough on crime "community morals" crusader. Hell, he may congratulate some of you for being charitable to the ladies. I jest, but you get my point.
-
11-10-23 07:29 #4349Senior Member

Posts: 517It's the handful that ruin it for everyone
I recently tied to screen with DS and they asked me for numerous pieces of PII and I declined. The only reason I can think why they ask for so much personal info is that it gives them a level of power over you because you cannot tell how a guy is going to behave when he's alone with a girl based on his DL, his job, etc. The best way to screen to see if he's well behaved is via other ladies he's seen. Co-sign on the comment that if we collectively refuse to give up PII they'll be forced to stop asking for it or they'll go out of business; but unfortunately there will also be a few weak links in the hobby chain that will cave and send it thus ruining it for everyone.
Originally Posted by Finitts
[View Original Post]
-
11-10-23 03:18 #4348Senior Member

Posts: 31The light bulb finally came on
One good thing that might come out of this is that we all collectively wake up and refuse to comply with these unreasonable screening requirements. If we refuse to hand over our PII to these agencies, they will stop requiring it. They have no legitimate need for our PII. But yet they do need our business, and will adapt to more reasonable screening like in years past.
Another observation. The affidavit says that surveillance has gone on for months and that they've interviewed 20 mongers. But yet no intel on this was reported. Makes me wonder how many investigations are currently going on against agencies, and how many guys are being flipped by the feds right now on agencies that are still operating. If you see something, say something!
Also, have you noticed that sometimes these agencies bring it on themselves. One agency has papasan in the hallway directing mongers. As I just said, the residents of that building might see something and also say something.
-
11-10-23 03:17 #4347Senior Member

Posts: 90My prediction
Only a matter of time before this all blows over. The owners will likely not face any jail time, at least not for prostitution or human trafficking. Just look at Wikipedia on Prostitution in the US: "Prostitution is illegal in the vast majority of the United States as a result of state laws rather than federal laws". There's no reason for federal agencies, like the DOJ and DHS, to get involved with suspected prostitution, as that's relegated to the state level. So now all they've got is human trafficking. But good luck getting those Korean women to testify. It should be noted that not a single news article mentioned that the authorities took these Asian women in for questioning. When you don't even have your main source of evidence in human trafficking cases (in this case, the women), what else have you got? Not much, so the cases will likely be tossed.
At best, they can probably hit the owners with money laundering or racketeering. So, some jail time is possible. But not much.
New agencies will pop up using different names. Probably run by the same people.
People on the so-called client list are safe. Having your name on a list is not evidence of a crime committed. Even sending text messages discussing payment for sex is not sufficient. They would need to catch you in the act to prove you engaged in prostitution. The agencies are not sting operations. There are no cameras set up inside the apartments.
-
11-10-23 02:54 #4346Senior Member

Posts: 805This is why I don't like and avoid screenings and photos. The last thing ya want is them getting access to a database of clients after busting a group and being on it.
If you share info use fake photos, burners, and never give real name/job/etc. Be safe boys! My personal logic that always pisses them off... Never give you real information to some 304 that won't give you her real first name.
What sucks is work was sending me up this weekend but I guess it's better to happen before I head up than during. Be safe boys!
Originally Posted by TheBdn0128
[View Original Post]
-
11-10-23 02:04 #4345Senior Member

Posts: 1274Good point
Good point, JmSuttr. Cops, do-gooders, and other activists like to slap the "trafficking" label on not only prostitution but porn these days, even if everyone involved is participating voluntarily and without coercion. It's a good way to keep the federal, state, and private foundation grants coming in.
Originally Posted by JmSuttr
[View Original Post]
Ideally the best solution is to legalize the hobby. There's no reason the government should prosecute consenting adults' activities simply because an exchange of money is involved. But that would require a willingness on the part of officeholders to change the laws against the hobby. That could still be a career-killer even with the changes in the public's attitudes toward sex over the last few decades.
By the way, it's good to see you posting again.
-
11-10-23 00:27 #4344Banned Member

Posts: 633Free Birds
That lockdown shit be real funny. I not do BEG, but I beens to so many other place where I knows the gals is free as birds.
Originally Posted by Derilious89
[View Original Post]
I bang a gal in a NYC joint in summer and was nearby the shop next day at Starbucks waiting to do another gal. Lo and behold first gal walks in shop laughing and acting like a princess with another working gal and order a frap. She look real good in street clothes and I just about say her "hi baby, want to date?" but I had to get to other date LOL.
Another time a gal gave me digits and lo and behold we fuck all week for discount at my hotel. I read all other kinds of stories like this. These gals not on lockdown for sure. Just like weed and booze this hobby need be legal.
-
11-09-23 23:04 #4343Senior Member

Posts: 110I liked the part in the document where they claim that one of the owners was 'locking' the door when he left apartments as a way to keep the girls locked in and act as implicit threat to work. Dude was just probably just locking the door to be extra safe about someone randomly walking in without the girl's permission. The cops had to stretch so hard to try and point to some sort of coercion and make it look like they actually did something good.
Originally Posted by NightHawk1967
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote









