Asian Providers

[Yogurt2020]

SDAG should've just kept their mouth shut and keep doing business as usual. There's been good providers this year and they seemed to expanded their incall apartments. I assumed business was going well, so to sour that with a strict review policy was a bad move on them.

But some of you are also ignorant to believe that photos and stats in ads need to be real. This is rarely ever the case with Asian establishments, and the SW industry as a whole. Of course they are going to be older than they say. Of course they aren't going to look like the super model fake picture they pick off of Instagram. It's called upselling, Marketing 101.

[RolfTorren]

Its a pity because they used to be the premier AAMP in SD and really outshone their rivals. I've had awesome experiences there over the years, and even in more recent times. But I pick and choose very carefully. The penchant for SoCal AAMPS to use fake picks is almost universal, at least for K-girls. Lets face it, today it takes just a few seconds to shoot and upload a real pic. They could all do it if they wanted, but they don't. And as for the objection that these girls' identities need to be protected. That's nonsense too. You can hide tattoos and not show faces. They are simply hiding the fact that these girls are probably in their 30's at least. Very few 20-somethings for sure, especially in the post-Covid era. And if you want to know which ones are less attractive, just assume that's the case with anyone who offers BBFS. The hotter ones don't need to go that route. Think of the amazing Petra. Don't get me wrong. Ash has a great reputation for service, but lets face it, she's way older than the website stated and also facially quite plain. But she fucks like a dynamo and is great.

The booker, whoever that is. And I think there's more than one person. Has always had attitude. I think they've changed over the years, just observing their style of communicating. But all have been less than friendly and basically interested in getting as much money out of patrons as they can. Never once was an underwhelming session compensated for with a discount, money back or a genuine promise of better service next time.

And they are not above banning guys who dare to write honest reviews.

So the lesson is, make sure you and your handle on this site and others are not connectable. Don't sit in the parking lot and write a review straight after a session. Wait at least a day or so. And if you have been rejected, there are a number of other good options in town to choose from.

I've never went to SDAG. When I tried to verify, who ever it was I was texting was an ass. So I guess they didn't need my money. Plenty happy to see other organizations and sure am not missing out on anything.

[Will008]

It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.

For example, Rachel has great sensual service. But admittedly she does not look like the pictures provided and she even is older. Which is honestly not a problem, but SDAG has been operating on shady principles to draw up business.

* Posting up photoshopped or completely fake pictures.

* Falsifying details (let's be real, most of those girls are NOT in their 20's).

* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).

* Sending shills to post on these boards (pretty sure one of them was the booker too).

And now they're hitting all new lows by threatening retaliation against customers for posting low scores. That is just unacceptable.

I admire the fact that the booker is on the side of the provider, but he should only do so if the provider can provide the right level of service. Like Yoji, Dallas, Jaine, etc. Are all fantastic girls. But stop upselling garbage girls or less attractive girls. If they don't have what it takes, lower their rates so they can make more on volume. Don't inflate these provider's egos, if they're not hot enough, they shouldn't be pampered.

I've never went to SDAG. When I tried to verify, who ever it was I was texting was an ass. So I guess they didn't need my money. Plenty happy to see other organizations and sure am not missing out on anything.

[Sir Bishop]

Here is a list of known K-Girl Agencies that will occasionally have girls in San Diego or are known to cycle girls here. The same girl may pop up on different agencies, as we have recently seen. So pick your fave booker if she's on multiple listings. This listing is provided as your starting point and the usual warnings about pics applies. Some websites show rates, ages, more info. This is not an endorsement of any agency.

https://www.yourlollygirls.com/sandiego

https://topangels.ch/all-angels/

https://www.thetopgirls.com

https://www.sweetasiangem.com/san-diego

https://get9irl.com/index.php?route=...ategory&path=2

https://www.candygirlla.com

https://www.cakdolls.cr/sd/

[CityboysUp]

It's a shame really because they've had a lot of great providers in the past and even some new ones.

For example, Rachel has great sensual service. But admittedly she does not look like the pictures provided and she even is older. Which is honestly not a problem, but SDAG has been operating on shady principles to draw up business.

* Posting up photoshopped or completely fake pictures.

* Falsifying details (let's be real, most of those girls are NOT in their 20's).

* Upcharging (this +100 rate for BBFS is absurd, especially when girls ask for finishing outside).

* Sending shills to post on these boards (pretty sure one of them was the booker too).

And now they're hitting all new lows by threatening retaliation against customers for posting low scores. That is just unacceptable.

I admire the fact that the booker is on the side of the provider, but he should only do so if the provider can provide the right level of service. Like Yoji, Dallas, Jaine, etc. Are all fantastic girls. But stop upselling garbage girls or less attractive girls. If they don't have what it takes, lower their rates so they can make more on volume. Don't inflate these provider's egos, if they're not hot enough, they shouldn't be pampered.

[RocketManP]

In the long term, maybe the booker apologizes and stops harassing and threatening customers. At the very least I'd hope he learned his lesson. And this debacle can be used to deter other orgs from doing the same.

And I disagree. You are saying "do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time."

No! They messed up when they instituted the policy, not when they got caught posting it publicly. I've canvassed many people throughout the years and many have told me the same thing about this place. If they (the agency) are proud of their policy and really believe in it, why hide it? Wear it proudly. Post it publicly.

The agency wants to have their cake and eat it too.

If the only thing they're sorry about is them accidentally posting it publicly, then they haven't learned their lesson. Which is. Let customers write any reviews they'd like to write provided they are honest and truthful. How hard is that? If they are so good as people say they are why do they need to silence people?

My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.

I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!

[FreeWally]

It's pretty common for the non-sdag groups popping up in sd that a flat-rate, all-inclusive of 320 is to be found. True, the turnaround on girls is quick yet that is determined by the girls, not the bookers. Reviews are fine when filtered through the bull shit lens. I want better value for my money. I'll donate 320 all-inclusive over the 280+100 option any day. The new kids on the block are bringing in younger girls, more accurate pics, better service, low rates.

Don't know how much this helps but I've rarely had accurate pics from any Korean bookers. Occasionally it's the actual girl in the photo. Whereas the Thai bookers SweetCandies, Sandra, Diamond seem to use real photos. I can confirm SweetCandies was 2 for 2 the actual girl with clear photos. But I will say the girls I've tried were both amateur (just started) and didn't offer the full range of services the Korean bookers offer (it hasn't mattered which one to me). On the plus I could preview and select by photo and so far the girls have been younger, early 20's.

Visited Chichi recently, she is curvy with big boobs for an Asian, English not too good (even compared to the Korean girls), loves having her tits sucked. Seems new. So pros and cons. Also it's in MV not UTC if that's a factor. But much simpler parking situation (lots of free 1 hour parking outside) and a straightforward gate unlike FEC. I was even thinking to go FEC but I guess I'm getting lazy when I think I'll have to try three ways just to get in.

Hope this helps.

[Clclcl]

So despite all the cross talk regarding SDAG business practices, has anyone TOFTT with Jupiter and care to report back?

Yes please let me know too. LOL.

[Clclcl]

Rank.

Jessica.

Mimi.

Jupiter.

Cheri.

Fec girl.

Rate 1 -5.

The order you would grab them.

[Sir Bishop]

I care less about their TER reviews, and more about their business ethics. Because let's face it, TER reviews already have a reputation for being inflated, and many think they are useless. But if they're tryna re-invent themselves, I recommend offering rates that can compete with LG (aka the new kids on the block).

It's pretty common for the non-sdag groups popping up in sd that a flat-rate, all-inclusive of 320 is to be found. True, the turnaround on girls is quick yet that is determined by the girls, not the bookers. Reviews are fine when filtered through the bull shit lens. I want better value for my money. I'll donate 320 all-inclusive over the 280+100 option any day. The new kids on the block are bringing in younger girls, more accurate pics, better service, low rates.

[SsStuntCock]

Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.

I care less about their TER reviews, and more about their business ethics. Because let's face it, TER reviews already have a reputation for being inflated, and many think they are useless. But if they're tryna re-invent themselves, I recommend offering rates that can compete with LG (aka the new kids on the block).

[BrainLara]

SDAG is trying to do damage control (based on their club post) but is it too late. My advice to them is to acknowledge a mistake was made, start over with a new domain, stop pressing people for good reviews, have Alex (if still there) work on his soft skills. I would hate to see them fold.

Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.

[SoapieFreek]

Not sure if they will get to have their reviews restored but just logged into SDAG and the ask the expert links are no longer there.

[FreeWally]

understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!

I just want to add some thoughts I didn't see mentioned here. I'm a happy customer of many bookers, FEC, SDAG, SweetCandies, etc. And some freelancers and girls in COI (I used to post mostly there). I've never had a bad experience, just maybe one girl I wasn't into out of 30. She still did her job right. So if I gave an honest review, the other 29 girls really would be 7 through 10. She'd get a 4 or 5. And just to give an idea I've been to TJ a lot and 90% of the girls in TJ I'd rate 5 to 7 so I'm not just inflating things, the services by these girls are objectively a whole league better.

And I'm not the only one, just today on HX Lollygirls sent out their mass spam ad and even posted TER ids for their two girls. I looked them up and Jessica literally has 30 reviews, 29 of them 7 through 10. Mimi only has 3 reviews and they're 8's. Even accounting for shills there aren't any big complaints. She wouldn't be working if it was common.

All I'm saying is even if half the reviews are fake shills, it is not unbelievable to me that girls would get 90%-95% 7 to 10 ratings. Because I personally would have rated 29 out of 30 girls the same. I also don't pay much attention to review numbers anyways, other than to read the reviews and get a general idea of the basic facts. I do think people should be free to post honest reviews of course. Wait a few days to post if you have concerns.

I want to close by saying even in countries where this is completely open and legal, the service is usually not as good. Sometimes cheaper. They are importing the right girls.

[Laf85]

How so? Purple and others still have profiles. I haven't tried to review, but their profiles are still there.

My guess would be any provider with an active link to an SDAG account got banned / deleted. Often times when a girl gets cycled out the link to their profile is no longer active and thus on the ter review the "current website / ad" defaults to a need a new url message. So you can see previous reviews under those conditions but I'm willing to bet as new reviews submitted with an SDAG website link gets submitted that will probably flag ter to remove those reviews. In the grand scheme of things it is quite a Lose-Lose situation for both the business and customers alike. Unreliable info mixed with real info allows the user to at least use his own smarts to differentiate between shill and legit reviews. But no info= no info. To boot no info for the business is an obvious drop in revenue.

I do think that whoever posted that on behalf of SDAG messed up big time. But before you call for pitchforks, understand that a lot of mongers still get their fill on Asian cravings through this business and with no ter to rely on now for reviews this site might be the best option for exchange of info at the moment and calling for any reviews to banned here might leave your fellow mongers completely in the dark when trying new girls. Just my two cents. Happy hunting all!