Asian Providers

**CunningLnguist** · 09-27-23 13:31

Originally Posted by MCHammerHang [View Original Post]

Saw Stella today and I wholeheartedly agree with Magnum's review. My experience with Kitten was a letdown, so this renewed my experience. Will be seeing her when she returns. Highly recommend seeing her before she leaves on Thursday!

I also had the opportunity to see Stella this week and she is a sweetheart. Super pretty all natural type of girl. She's got a sexy devilish smile and her lips feel great when kissing.

I think I can say I've tried all the Latinas that have come through SDAG in the last year. I still have Cuban Ginger and Betty as my top best experience and service. I'd probably have Max at the bottom. And between Stella and Kitten it's a tough one for me. I had an amazing experience with Kitten. When it comes to looks and body I think Kitten has them beat. For service and experience I can see why some might be let down especially since she don't offer bare and BBJ was so so. Low key I got to fuck her bare. But that was only because when she was first advertised she had the (O). She was taken by surprised when I gave her the tip for bare and said she didn't do that. I was surprised too but said no worries b / c she was hot AF and because of that I would still enjoy it covered. But after she rode me for a little bit covered she said fuck it and said she'd let me in raw but only because she was really attracted to me. Felt so good to hit it without the cover. Probably the hottest chick I've ever got to fuck raw!

**SuchaDilf** · 09-27-23 13:26

I'm visiting east bay near San Ramon next week and I was hoping for any agency recommendations similar to sdag.

Thank you.

**Usgyinyang** · 09-27-23 00:52

Unfortunate. I read on the OC boards a while back that she previously did CIP.

Originally Posted by BigCoomer [View Original Post]

I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.

Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.

BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.

She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.

She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.

**BKane80** · 09-27-23 00:39

Originally Posted by TacoManVa [View Original Post]

Back in the day it was close to the same service, but now it is not even the same sport. Thai girls in SD offer terrible service meanwhile SDAG has some super stars. Worth every penny to me. They crush the FS massage spas, and as sad as it may be the popular FS spots in Kearny Mesa and UFS are better than the Thai agencies.

But nowhere close to the K groups. K groups are much safer too.

100% agree with this. I miss the Thai agencies of old.

**DeeeezNutss** · 09-27-23 00:38

Originally Posted by Magnum44 [View Original Post]

I have seen Stella twice and highly recommend her. She's really sexy and gives good service. Her pics are fairly accurate. Not the usual kgirl experience (she's actually Latina) but she aims to please. I often go to Hong Kong in TJ and she's your typical 8 or 9 in my book. I'd like her to do well in SD. Pay her a visit and treat her kindly before she leaves.

Just saw her today and she's a 9 in my book in looks, GND type of girl and body which is banging. She speaks fluent English and her mains are a turn on. See while you can, she leaves on the 29th which I most likely will.

**MCHammerHang** · 09-26-23 23:33

Originally Posted by Magnum44 [View Original Post]

I have seen Stella twice and highly recommend her. She's really sexy and gives good service. Her pics are fairly accurate. Not the usual kgirl experience (she's actually Latina) but she aims to please. I often go to Hong Kong in TJ and she's your typical 8 or 9 in my book. I'd like her to do well in SD. Pay her a visit and treat her kindly before she leaves.

Saw Stella today and I wholeheartedly agree with Magnum's review. My experience with Kitten was a letdown, so this renewed my experience. Will be seeing her when she returns. Highly recommend seeing her before she leaves on Thursday!

**Yogurt2020** · 09-26-23 23:19

I agree with everybody it is a pretty stupid statement from SDAG regarding their review policy, but isn't that the very purpose of this forum to be able to provide reviews without giving a score? Scores are so hard to interpret since its subjective, but actual written reviews / reports on forums give so much more light on what kind of look & service a girl provides.

Scoring on TER is never really a good indicator. A girl I thought was average at best in looks would sometimes get a mid 8's on TER, which is pretty good for k-orgs. For example, I thought SDAG Dallas, though exotic and unique, was not exceptionally pretty. But TER has her at 8. 3, which is on the higher end of k-org looks. And same could be said other way around.

**Dmzhost** · 09-26-23 20:27

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

This doesn't seem like it would work. It would likely just destroy business for their girls who have little to no reviews? Either people will just assume anyone not rated an 8 or better is a 1, and that anyone without reviews becomes an even bigger risk to TOFTT.

**TacoManVa** · 09-26-23 18:57

Originally Posted by FreeWally [View Original Post]

The Thai agencies like SweetCandies sometimes use real photos, for better or worse. Hit and miss but there's at least that.

Back in the day it was close to the same service, but now it is not even the same sport. Thai girls in SD offer terrible service meanwhile SDAG has some super stars. Worth every penny to me. They crush the FS massage spas, and as sad as it may be the popular FS spots in Kearny Mesa and UFS are better than the Thai agencies.

But nowhere close to the K groups. K groups are much safer too.

**Member #6585** · 09-26-23 16:20

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

A while back another member had alerted me of being careful what I post for this exact reason. Its a bit unfortunate, but I guess it kind of makes sense with how review based this hobby is. Its just like restaurants with Yelp. A restaurant's business is definitely make or break based on reviews, and yelp runs a racket based on that. We luckily have the free speech and have no fear of removal / fake metrics, so it makes sense that the bookers themselves would probably purge who they feel is disadvantageous to their business.

Not sure what the right solution is, but I suppose its just the unfortunate reality. I'm usually willing to TOFTT with girls with little to no reviews, but have definitely been burned before by that, so I understand the reluctance from other mongers to see a girl with little / no reviews.

**Member #6585** · 09-26-23 16:12

Originally Posted by Yogurt2020 [View Original Post]

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

I kinda don't mind it because I feel like SDAG and FEC seem to cover taller / average height women. I love the petite and small Asians so I'm a big fan and have found myself frequenting the SAG and Lolly girls much more.

Which speaking of, saw Mimi today and was very impressed.

BBFS (no cip), lots of DFK and LFK and BJ was off the charts. Very sloppy with lots of gagging and deep throating and ball and gooch licking.

She doesn't look like the pics but she's very cute and pretty still. She has like all of the stereotypical Korean features, which I loved. Perfect little tiny natural b's, maybe a's with erect nipples and small areolas. What's really impressive is how big of an ass is on this tiny girl. I love the tiny tits, big booty and nice hips combo. She's nice and slim as well.

She's a ton of fun and loves to fuck while being cute and playful. I'm a big fan and will be repeating.

**PoonTangJohnny** · 09-26-23 15:31

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

Cancel Culture / Censorship, meets the San Diego AAMP scene; what a wonderful business model for your customer's. 1 which instills trust / honesty / satisfaction. Whether you're happy, or not. AYFKE!?

Copied & Pasted from your link, SDPP:

"ASK THE EXPERT.

We appreciate reviews on any site but we hope that you remember a few things.

Some ladies you are going to love.

Some ladies you are going to like.

Some ladies are just ok

Some ladies you aren't going to match with.

Please do NOT give 7 or 6 or 5 or less.

* 7 or less KILLS business for that lady and other ladies.

If you choose to give reviews that are negative, then we will.

Have to sever our partnership and you will not get to visit others.

We will do our best to figure out who you are.

Remember our rule. If you like the lady tell everyone.

8 or higher.

If you don't then tell the assistant. "

SDAG, is the Private Delights, of the San Diego AAMP business market.

I'm just so very grateful, 1 for never having paid for an HX membership (3 years in quarantine), and secondly, for not being approved by SDAG. The stringent approval methods, have easily saved me $5-10 k over the past few years, which I've happily spent elsewhere. This self-serving AAMP isn't the only game in town. & if they keep this type of censorship BS up (along with their ridiculously higher prices). They'll eventually learn a very hard lesson in business 101, trickle down Economics.

FWIW: I've been doing just fine, having so much hot fun with some fucking amazing hot talent at so MANY of the awesome places, here in Disneyland AMP Central (SD County), USA!

**SsStuntCock** · 09-26-23 15:24

Originally Posted by SDPewPew [View Original Post]

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

How brazen of SDAG to advertise that on their website. SMH. Good thing SD has FEC and LG to turn to.

**SDPewPew** · 09-26-23 14:01

https://sdasiangirls.com/index.php/a...ask-the-expert

Get blacklisted if the booker catches you writing negative reviews. That's some bullshiiiit LOL.

Admin should ban any SDAG posts for this tactic.

**FreeWally** · 09-26-23 01:15

Originally Posted by Yogurt2020 [View Original Post]

Anyone notice that so far the vast majority of girls on SAG / lollypop have been under 5'? What is up with them specializing in very tiny koreans. Unless they are actually a bit taller and the bookers are just lazy and is copy pasting the same stats over and over.

Are you talking recently and from personal experience, because having gone for 9 years the vast majority were not.