NoVA SugarBabies

[EasyeOne]

Wouldn't the URL change with a new account? Either way, I tried that and it didn't work.

She has two pages of reviews on here. Like others have said, most of the folks on here have had a taste. Search using this: 93 e60 d88.

[CuriousVaMan]

So I met a woman on Seeking back in the Spring. Regrettably, we had a difficult time with scheduling and never actually met. I texted her a couple times over the Summer. No response.

Did a last Hail Mary text today. Received a response "She has retired. " WTF. This chick was 20! I figure a family member discovered her sugaring activities and put a stop to it.

[Buddy Rock]

Or just search by the last 12 letters and / or digits of the link, like everyone else does.

Wouldn't the URL change with a new account? Either way, I tried that and it didn't work.

[Itfcd]

I remember this one being reviewed a while ago. But can't recall the reviews because I believe she had a different user name.

Anyone have intel? Either here or via PM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...f-a04dc13224af

Or just search by the last 12 letters and / or digits of the link, like everyone else does.

[Buddy Rock]

I remember this one being reviewed a while ago. But can't recall the reviews because I believe she had a different user name.

Anyone have intel? Either here or via PM.

https://members.seeking.com/member/9...f-a04dc13224af

[Arty33]

This is a good collection I must say I am impressed you found quite this many out of which 4- or 5 are definitely good finds. I've been talking to one of them and finally did meet her that met your description of her below, so thanks for the validation. However, was trying to DM you to ask more about your take and it is full.

These are ones I am throwing back to the fishbowl:

https://members.seeking.com/member/a...0-ec9258837041

DTF for $500.

https://members.seeking.com/member/b...0-7208e9ea5cae

DTF for $500. She is thicker in real life.

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...2-dcbb4a39a731

DTF for $500. Wild and fun.

https://members.seeking.com/messages...8-ee9f1c618a9a

DTF for $500. A bit thick in the trunk if that is your thing..

[Shinshi]

Charminggg

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...1-e6f51807616a

This one reached out a few days ago, but I haven't responded. Though the pics are blurred, I recognized her from another older profile that's since-deleted. And from what I recall, someone reported here that she was down with BBFSCIP in 2021. Currently messaging other SBs and wanting to see how those will pan out first. But I am curious if anyone has anything recent on her. If you prefer PM, my inbox is clear. Cheers!

[FairFight]

But its a fetish. Those guys arent trying to wife them up.

I'm shocked that folks are paying to fuck women who look like that. She couldn't pay ME to fuck. But I've also seen women advertising on escort sites where I'm disgusted that folks are paying them. So I guess there is a market for every woman. Regardless of how misshapen or unattractive.

[Squatty2]

That's obese. All these obese and grandma's are proliferating all over dc seeking. People are paying to bang this trash.

I'm shocked that folks are paying to fuck women who look like that. She couldn't pay ME to fuck. But I've also seen women advertising on escort sites where I'm disgusted that folks are paying them. So I guess there is a market for every woman. Regardless of how misshapen or unattractive.

[FarFarAway]

That's how I share pics, too. What's nice is you can delete the image after you send it. When I was still using a real pic I would use this and the delete it shortly after. This way if the convo later went south my photo wasn't there permanently the way it would be if I sent via text. But flip side is it meant my face was on SA's server.

I ended up burning my old profile down to the ground and starting anew though. Will only use a fake pic. It's not great but it is close enough. Image search scares me too much.

I thought that was a good idea for a while too, to send pics through the site and then delete them. But your point, SA has your pic, is the issue. I had a girl I messaged that way decide to report me for 'pic not of the person'. SA has all the evidence they need right there, and that profile got banned. This was a couple of years ago, it wasn't as big a deal as it is now, and I have other profiles I can use. I typically have two, one I actually have a membership with, and another to check on profiles that I may have blocked (or vice versa).

And you are correct, the threat of facial recognition sites (not just image search) is real, and we are definitely vulnerable based on any real photos we provide to POTs. I have posted on this recently, I think we need to be vigilant, searching on the photos we've been sending to make sure they aren't showing up in the results, and when they are, submitting them for removal from search.

[Blackhand]

https://members.seeking.com/member/f...a-69a0ad5881ae

Anyone happen to have any Intel on Sarah? Recently started speaking with her but feel I've seen her before. Seems pretty open to meet.

[Mcsylv]

I know eros has fake accounts. So unless anyone has actually met her, I would assume its not her.

Chloe Temple escorts, see link:

https://porncompanions.com/5658-Chloetemple

If she was up here, maybe she was using SA to advertise. 800 PPM is cheap, the agency rate is 1600/ hour.

[TomFordModel]

A bit too chubby for my taste. I personally wouldn't pay more than 3 but I suspect that if I ask she will say 4 or 5.

That's obese. All these obese and grandma's are proliferating all over dc seeking. People are paying to bang this trash.

[FairFight]

I know eros has fake accounts. So unless anyone has actually met her, I would assume its not her.

I've seen her available on Eros in DC a few times.

[AdcFellow]

I've seen her available on Eros in DC a few times.

She responded to me and asked for 800 ppm. Told me her porn name. Said she was here for a week. I did not indulge.