Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 13,096 to 13,110 of 50991
-
09-18-23 17:18 #37896Senior Member

Posts: 442It is safe to assume that majority (90%) of k-girls are over 30 years of age. Once in a while, you get anomaly like Maia, Krystal or Ina who are below 30 years old. And Asian women do not really show their age and if they look good and body is good, who really cares anyway. I think when the provider pass age of 42 or 43 is when you really have to think about it hard.
Originally Posted by Phazze93
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 16:12 #37895Senior Member

Posts: 126Have you tried any of these girls before & know the rates? Being new, can I use simply tell other agencies that I'm verified with kbliss and they can validate me that way?
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
TER seems somewhat unreliable at times when it comes to age. Range says 21-25, but reviews might state she's 35+ or whatever.
-
09-18-23 16:05 #37894Senior Member

Posts: 126
Originally Posted by SolarisMan
[View Original Post]
Yea just curious is all from a business standpoint, if you were a popular provider, going for the 340+100 bb+40 msog would make more sense than the less frequented providers charging that.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
Anyways, I'm just exploring more variation at this point since kbliss lineup is relatively small.
At the same time, if I'm going once a week, I also don't really want to increase my spending by an extra 140 on a weekly basis on providers that are less reviewed. When I know what I'll be getting from kbliss. With that being said, if anyone has any recommendations for girls similar to Maia, Ina & Krystal in terms of age, physique & service (offering BB, MSOG). I'd love to hear it! I'm researching as well ofc.
I know it shouldn't matter if she's 30 but looks 20, but I still prefer providers who are early 20's considering I'm early 30's.
-
09-18-23 14:25 #37893Senior Member

Posts: 2525Better question is why aren't the other girls charging LESS? But let's really put the rat on the table and ask why dudes succumb to such dastardly upcharges to begin with.
Originally Posted by Phazze93
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 13:53 #37892Regular Member

Posts: 20I'm visiting from out of state, any agencies to visit and any agencies to avoid?
-
09-18-23 11:56 #37891Senior Member

Posts: 787So they can stay busy and make $$ If you want to pay more you can always frequent those kgirls that ask for more. LOL.
Originally Posted by Phazze93
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 11:47 #37890Senior Member

Posts: 2152Kbliss Monday roundup.
Viki Hana Maia Juni Ina.
-
09-18-23 11:32 #37889Senior Member

Posts: 442As a newbie, try to understand that West LA hub is like a Costco and you will get a better deal. MW and K-Town can be referred to as Up-Charge town.
Originally Posted by Phazze93
[View Original Post]
Krystal, Ina and Maia are all good girls and each have strength and no weaknesses. Too bad Krystal is not here anymore.
-
09-18-23 11:29 #37888Senior Member

Posts: 442Wet Dream Indeed.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 10:40 #37887Senior Member

Posts: 787T-E-are I'd 377117.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
https://loveksweetie.com/mia
-
09-18-23 05:50 #37886Senior Member

Posts: 126Kbliss v cgla
Question for those more experienced in the Kgirl scene. Only agency I've gone through was kbliss via a referral.
I've tried krystal (2), maia (3) & ina (1).
Looking at the forum, it seems like INA has consistently one of the most popular providers. Anyone know why she wouldn't be charging more?
She's at 340 flat, whereas 90% of providers on CGLA are 320 base + 100 for bb + 40 for msog, etc. And none of which seem to be nearly as popular as INA?
Personally, Maia is a younger nymph hence the repeats. Ina was great but clearly has had some work done as she's nearing her late 20's.
-
09-18-23 03:12 #37885Senior Member

Posts: 337Not sure about LA, but the J-girls in Toronto are super young and all have been very pretty. Unfortunately, none of them stop in LA since I'm sure they can't just go from Canada to the US that easily as a Japanese citizen. If LA treats these new girls well, we might get more options in the future.
Originally Posted by Tbtbfftb
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 02:32 #37884Senior Member

Posts: 3560Which Mia?
Your link doesn't work.
Originally Posted by RockItAllNite
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 02:29 #37883Senior Member

Posts: 3560While I agree many girls now are not as hot or skilled as before, I have met some HYAs that could replace the New Good Days providers. Only 2 or 3 older providers you mentioned may still be in my rotation with new HYAs if they all stay at the same time.
I may not even see the women from the good old days now. It's not their real age. It's their face and body that may disappoint me. I have always felt excited chasing new HYAs since I saw my first hot young Kgirl which started the Kgirl addiction.
I never once thought Elle was past her prime or look like MILF. Her body is still unmatched and face still attractive. I still repeat and don't feel the GPS.
Originally Posted by BuildingGuy
[View Original Post]
-
09-18-23 02:21 #37882Senior Member

Posts: 3560LA Baby Sakura was already reviewed in HYA thread. Irvine Sakura could be a hidden gem or nothing to write home about. Fake pics and I will check her out if I have time.
More will TOFTT on Jgirls when good reviews are legit. Check out BC review in PLEASER thread to see why there not much noise about Jgirls even with such a large influx.
Originally Posted by Tbtbfftb
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



