Los Angeles County Asian Providers

**Ggininder** · 08-18-23 01:51

Asked couple of Korean girls I believe they know Jazmin.

The speculation is she's kidnapped by a regular customer, believed to be an old white guy.

When I heard how it was going I felt quite sad.

Because it sounded like the booker didn't care, the detective who's in charge of it didn't care, even Jazmin's family in Korea didn't care.

Jazmin's friend (who's also a provider) somehow knew there's this regular but had no further information about him, so she tried to ask the booker to offer it to the police. However, the booker is reluctant to do so.

The detective was on vacation after received the report. And it seemed like police doesn't care a non-legal immigrant.

I was told Jazmin's family in Korea didn't seem like they care or worry Jazmin is missing. What said here that her family is visiting later this year seemed wrong.

**Goku17** · 08-18-23 01:24

I am posting all the links together so they are not spread out. I think the facebook one will probably get the most traffic, there is a decent number of shares on it.

https://www.facebook.com/CityofSanMateoPolice/

https://hoodline.com/2023/08/communi...ent-continues/

https://www.kron4.com/news/bay-area/...-seen-in-july/

https://nixle.us/ENJ4K

https://twitter.com/SanMateoPD/statu...06040782766215

https://www.instagram.com/p/CwEFe4UxoM2/?img_index=1

https://namus.nij.ojp.gov/case/MP106675

https://oag.ca.gov/missing/person/dami-kim

**Goku17** · 08-18-23 01:14

Originally Posted by LC310 [View Original Post]

It is not about flying. If her missing person case is categorized as unknown or voluntary then the police are not going to put resources into finding her unless presented facts that change it to a suspicious circumstances missing person case.

It is that simple.

I don't think Hong Kong is disagreeing with suspicious circumstance case, he is just saying he knows for sure she didn't get on an airplane and you mentioned airplanes. That's it.

It was hong kong and I that found out Jazmin was missing when no one believed me when I posted it last week. We both know her.

**LC310** · 08-18-23 00:44

Originally Posted by HongKongBoy [View Original Post]

Jazmin cannot fly in the US because she doesn't have any I'd. And her family in Korean did not hear from her since July 13.

It is not about flying. If her missing person case is categorized as unknown or voluntary then the police are not going to put resources into finding her unless presented facts that change it to a suspicious circumstances missing person case.

It is that simple.

**Hong Kong Boy** · 08-18-23 00:28

Originally Posted by LC310 [View Original Post]

Missing person cases are categorized (i.e. catastrophic - victim of an earthquake, flood, etc - dependent child / adult, abduction, etc). If this case is categorized as unknown (no facts to determine circumstances) or voluntary (the person left on their own free will), then the cops are not going to be doing anything until facts come forward that recategorize it to an abduction or by suspicious circumstances.

Knowledge of her profession could cause the police to consider her case to fall in the suspicious circumstances category and thus would put some resources behind it.

There are standards and procedures for missing persons in the state of California and if you're interested see - https://post.ca.gov/portals/0/post_docs/publications/Missing_Persons_Investigations.pdf

There is a chance that she wanted out of the game and booked a flight and took off. Or she was in love and left with some guy to start a new life without telling anyone.

Jazmin cannot fly in the US because she doesn't have any I'd. And her family in Korean did not hear from her since July 13.

**AkaLegend** · 08-18-23 00:04

Originally Posted by KalvinHobbs [View Original Post]

I feel like if she took a flight somewhere that can be easily found out by 5 0 if they're even checking.

Not to be a dick or anything, but can we keep stop talking about this?

**LC310** · 08-17-23 23:28

Originally Posted by KalvinHobbs [View Original Post]

I feel like if she took a flight somewhere that can be easily found out by 5 0 if they're even checking.

If this is a missing person case categorized as unknown or voluntarily missing, the cops are not going to search flight records unless presented with facts that move it to another category. The fact that she was in the kgirl business could cause the police to automatically determine there are suspicious circumstances because of the legal status of her work.

**KalvinHobbs** · 08-17-23 23:11

Originally Posted by LC310 [View Original Post]

There is a chance that she wanted out of the game and booked a flight and took off. Or she was in love and left with some guy to start a new life without telling anyone.

I feel like if she took a flight somewhere that can be easily found out by 5 0 if they're even checking.

**EasyPeasyDong** · 08-17-23 23:11

Originally Posted by LC310 [View Original Post]

Missing person cases are categorized (i.e. catastrophic - victim of an earthquake, flood, etc - dependent child / adult, abduction, etc). If this case is categorized as unknown (no facts to determine circumstances) or voluntary (the person left on their own free will), then the cops are not going to be doing anything until facts come forward that recategorize it to an abduction or by suspicious circumstances.

Knowledge of her profession could cause the police to consider her case to fall in the suspicious circumstances category and thus would put some resources behind it.

There are standards and procedures for missing persons in the state of California and if you're interested see - https://post.ca.gov/portals/0/post_docs/publications/Missing_Persons_Investigations.pdf

There is a chance that she wanted out of the game and booked a flight and took off. Or she was in love and left with some guy to start a new life without telling anyone.

Why can't someone try to trace her phone where it last pinged? Or triangulate the last location?

I don't think the bookers or agencies would have been involved. May have been a client who was stalking her? Or invited her for a late night dinner or something.

Booker has to know more. I don't think booker was involved but they must have more info or people they suspect.

What about her friends. They may have known if someone was stalking her or bothering her or if she was dating a client, etc.

The key is surveillance. SO much surveillance cameras there. Did she get in a car willingly? Can you see the license plate? Did she walk across to get something to eat? Etc. etc.

Surveillance is the only real place to start or her personal phone number which detectives could check to see if its still active being used or if she was texted or called prior, etc.

**EasyPeasyDong** · 08-17-23 23:08

Originally Posted by LC310 [View Original Post]

Missing person cases are categorized (i.e. catastrophic - victim of an earthquake, flood, etc - dependent child / adult, abduction, etc). If this case is categorized as unknown (no facts to determine circumstances) or voluntary (the person left on their own free will), then the cops are not going to be doing anything until facts come forward that recategorize it to an abduction or by suspicious circumstances.

Knowledge of her profession could cause the police to consider her case to fall in the suspicious circumstances category and thus would put some resources behind it.

There are standards and procedures for missing persons in the state of California and if you're interested see - https://post.ca.gov/missing-persons

There is a chance that she wanted out of the game and booked a flight and took off. Or she was in love and left with some guy to start a new life without telling anyone.

000000000001% chance she just left all her expensive stuff behind. There are ways to get out without just leaving stuff.

I hope I am wrong and would gladly be wrong.

**LC310** · 08-17-23 22:58

Missing person cases are categorized (i.e. catastrophic - victim of an earthquake, flood, etc - dependent child / adult, abduction, etc). If this case is categorized as unknown (no facts to determine circumstances) or voluntary (the person left on their own free will), then the cops are not going to be doing anything until facts come forward that recategorize it to an abduction or by suspicious circumstances.

Knowledge of her profession could cause the police to consider her case to fall in the suspicious circumstances category and thus would put some resources behind it.

There are standards and procedures for missing persons in the state of California and if you're interested see - https://post.ca.gov/portals/0/post_docs/publications/Missing_Persons_Investigations.pdf

There is a chance that she wanted out of the game and booked a flight and took off. Or she was in love and left with some guy to start a new life without telling anyone.

**EasyPeasyDong** · 08-17-23 22:49

Originally Posted by Goku17 [View Original Post]

https://www.instagram.com/p/CwEFe4UxoM2/?img_index=1

Was she working that day she went missing?

If so, what time last appointment?

Did she check in with booker after last appointment?

If so, she probably took her dog for a walk a few minutes after to end the night.

There should be some way to trace her phone and see where it was last pinging?

Should be countless surveillance videos from nearby business.

Booker should also know if any client gave her problems or was bothering her.