Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 4,276 to 4,290 of 24216
-
08-01-23 13:17 #19941Senior Member

Posts: 1341Kayla
Hey all anyone have any experience with this one? She looks pretty decent.
TIA.
https://skipthegames.com/posts/crans...-/028577057892
-
08-01-23 08:36 #19940Senior Member

Posts: 152Anyone seen this one?
I was wondering if anyone has ever seen this one. I have not seen her post in the past, and she does look TGTBT, but thought I'd ask just in case.
https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...-/751272081209
-
08-01-23 08:06 #19939Senior Member

Posts: 2085Natasha
The pics are def her. She got "married" and went away for a few years. I will ping her to assess. Seems like she def has a bf. But seems to be with 2 guys, unless one is baby daddy and the other is the new bf.
Originally Posted by KingOfFours
[View Original Post]
-
07-31-23 19:07 #19938Senior Member

Posts: 270Took a ride with this one at Econo today. Pretty much echo what you said except she really wanted the rubber. Said no way so she told me to pull out. I did, mostly. 100 for qv. Pretty easy to communicate and we hopped right to business. Ain't no way in hell I'd go down on that dark mass of flesh. Probly won't repeat either.
Originally Posted by NewEnglabd
[View Original Post]
-
07-31-23 12:42 #19937Senior Member

Posts: 3748Mimi
I assume you mean this Mimi:
Originally Posted by LustyB
[View Original Post]
https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...t/861850943897
On the other board, she's got 9 reviews. All but one specifically mention a cover for fucking. The one that didn't reported no evidence that the fuck was raw. All but the most recent one indicate BBBJ, but the most recent blow job was covered, and it seemed that was NOT the reviewer's choice. "Light kissing" was stated in one review, the others did not mention kissing at all. There was no mention of DATY in any report.
Based on what I read, I would not expect this girl would fuck raw, nor would I expect any kind of decent GFE performance. So for me, she appears to be a hard pass.
Nevertheless, I like her ad pics, so I wish someome would prove me wrong!
-
07-31-23 11:19 #19936Senior Member

Posts: 1661I thought about seeing this one even though it look like it's cfs. Reading thru the forum, it looks like a BBBJ could even be YMMV. I'm also not sure about grabbing the condom so quick. One review even said that she got the condom out before she even started the BJ. Seems like a rush job to me. She has a lot of reviews on the other site I can't see so if anyone else has any input, I'm all ears.
Originally Posted by IcebergSlim
[View Original Post]
But from my perspective my interest is starting to wane.
Can anyone confirm some daty? DFK? I can't pump a pussy for 20 minutes. I'm not 25 anymore. I need a little unrushed foreplay.
-
07-31-23 11:05 #19935Senior Member

Posts: 3748Thanks, Swim. So it seems that the bum's rush aspect hasn't changed. I managed to get BBFSCIP for a 50 upsell 8 years ago, but reports were always YMMV back then, for that. And YMMV with DFK as well, although I induced her to do it nicely while shooting my baby batter into her.
Originally Posted by SwimSays
[View Original Post]
So, unless anyone else reports that she'll still take bare cock in cunnt, at least selectively, and is still willing to properly stick tongue in mouth like the obedient GFE that she was before, then, for me, this latest incarnation of her will remain a hard pass.
-
07-31-23 10:29 #19934Senior Member

Posts: 3748Natasha / Anastasia
Wow! Look at this! The picture in that ad that was posted today (on the left) was apparently taken in the SAME room (or, at least, its the EXACT same furniture) as the one I inseminated her in, 8 years ago (my own pic, on the right)! So it is definitely her in those recent sumo ad pictures! Also, look at the vastus medialis in her quads, it is very highly developed and the shape is distinctive!
But the question is, is it really her, or her “manager” that posted the recent sumo ad, or were those ad pics stolen?
Originally Posted by KingOfFours
[View Original Post]
-
07-31-23 10:12 #19933Senior Member

Posts: 685Same provider but service level has gone down. Has put on some weight but curves in all the right places, like her body style but really wish her menu wasn't some restricted this time around. She popped back up in the last year and her service is much more mechanical. No Kissing, No Daty, No FIV, no MSOG. Incall was nice and comfortable however. I booked an HR expecting similar level service as 6 to 8 years ago but was ready to leave within 20 minutes. And she was ready for me to leave too.
Originally Posted by KingOfFours
[View Original Post]
Will not repeat.
-
07-31-23 10:02 #19932Senior Member

Posts: 3748Brazilian Natasha / Anastasia: Is this the latest incarnation of her?
I THINK this is the same one that went by Natasha, then Anastasia, then she disappeared over a year ago? Here is the current ad, it just went up today:
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/h...er-me/57896586
Here is an old ad that Natasha / Anastasia had used over a year ago, assumming its the same girl as in the link above, and not just someone stealing her pictures:
https://sumosear.ch/images/webpage/e...tasia/46215612
The pictures I myself took of her and her her sperm-filled snatch back in 2015 can be viewed in my post, "Rub Girl Natasha", #11572 on this page:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...408&viewfull=1#post4944408.
Can anyone confirm that the ad in that first sumo link above is really Brazilian Natasha / Anastasia? She was surely a hot little fuck toy back in 2015, and a satisfying GFE CIP lay, but shorted on time big time, so I only cum-pumped her that one time. It was in that notorious "massage" incall on Royal Street. So I'm wondering if her menu is still the same, that is, nice DFK and CIP, after all these years, but perhaps, in her current maturity, without the bum's rush?
-
07-31-23 08:25 #19931Senior Member

Posts: 3748Fay
Please take pictures, Lusty, of all of her, after you leave your deposit inside her, and post them up! If she's as slutty and accommodating as they say she is, she surely won't mind! 😈.
Originally Posted by LustyB
[View Original Post]
-
07-31-23 07:59 #19930Senior Member

Posts: 406Horrendous and Old
Add 15 years or so to her age. LOL Still using old pictures from years ago! She lies about her age and uses mostly fake pictures. She does not perform the deeds she purports. Liar! Liar! Pants on fire! One of the most useless of providers ever. Only a fool would further proceed pursuing this biatch. She has been around for many, many years as well. Comes and goes because she gets called out and reported on; as was the case when CL was relevant many years ago now. Hard pass.
Originally Posted by ScottBoxster
[View Original Post]
-
07-31-23 06:33 #19929Senior Member

Posts: 1661I'm going to see her Friday and report back. As long as you gents say she's a slam dunk raw fuck.
Originally Posted by DaveDarlings
[View Original Post]
-
07-30-23 17:20 #19928Senior Member

Posts: 270Facially sort of similar to this but older and teeth aren't as good. They aren't falling out of her head bad just dirtier. Tits are big but soft and flattened on her chest. Belly is big but not rolls of fat, stretch lines and so forth. Place is the usual. Clothes covering the couch. Bed didn't smell bad. I'd say Fay might have looked like this one ten years ago but now she's just older. But she loves to fuck. And that's a good thing.
Originally Posted by KingOfFours
[View Original Post]
-
07-30-23 14:30 #19927Senior Member

Posts: 3748The value, Scorpion, was to provide concrete examples of the appearance of the types of overweight hoes that I would find acceptable, as opposed to those I would not. I was asking about Flirty Fay, and provided specific examples, for comparison, in order to help others understand what I was talking about. It was to help me decide if I wanted to see Fay, or not.
Originally Posted by Scorpio1981
[View Original Post]
But what was the value of YOUR post, Scorpion, which I quoted above?








Reply With Quote



