Non Pro's

[Mamouna]

Your girls are, for sure.

Not everyone using SA takes that attitude. I get on there to find one girl I can have an ongoing relationship with, and I get off. And over time, there is exchange of a lot of different things in our relationship. Among them are money and physical relations. Lots of other stuff too. I'd challenge someone, if I gave them a list, to differentiate things I do with / for my wife and my SB. I am sure neither of them read USASG.

Everyone gets the bowl they are looking for.

You're completely off the mark. LOL. I never talk about "my girls" because I don't broadcast my private life on a forum for sex-crazed guys.

OFC there's a variety, including the neo-traditionalist types that seek validation about how romantic their arrangements are on reddit. I was speaking of a specific kind of user, specifically the semi-pro women on SA. But on the whole, I believe mutual respect includes not being a sucker. And I don't buy into the idea that some sugaring is somehow progressive and "more than" sex work.

[FarFarAway]

I don't quite understand everything you're saying but I agree 100% with the classification of sex work that includes sugaring. I can't prove it but in the short time I've been doing the SA route, more women are on there willing to negotiate for "short term" arrangements, aka ONS, than when I started. I know a girl who did sugaring, she was there for quick money not to find a "daddy". Maybe the fantasy is to find one, but that's like probably less than 10% of all arrangements on the site.

The fact is that sugaring is just the latest workaround to the moral hypocrisy in this country regarding sexuality and income inequality. And women like FB profit off of the illegality of sex work. It benefits them financially and so does attacking anyone who disagrees. That's why I have no moral qualms about negotiating because it has nothing to do with exploitation, it's a money grab on their part. If it was legal, prices would plummet to levels that legitimate competition would dictate. Just look at the marijuana industry, it would be the same thing. Regulated, safer, and CHEAP.

Your girls are, for sure.

Not everyone using SA takes that attitude. I get on there to find one girl I can have an ongoing relationship with, and I get off. And over time, there is exchange of a lot of different things in our relationship. Among them are money and physical relations. Lots of other stuff too. I'd challenge someone, if I gave them a list, to differentiate things I do with / for my wife and my SB. I am sure neither of them read USASG.

Everyone gets the bowl they are looking for.

[Merovingian2]

Congrats, that ms one in a million. Most of the people of SB are content sellers. Keep up the hard work!

She use to be on SA but dropped off it. That's where some of her met her. She's the real deal. There are a couple more that have migrated from SA to SB that I've met and know they are DTF.

[JSnake921]

Manisha / Jasmyne is young but a freak. She's done threesomes with mongers from here and she will take it raw including CIP. A little annoying sometimes but you can just tune out her nonsense. Don't be a white knight and tell her about USG LOL. If you bang her, drop me a message and let me know if you like it as much as a few of us did.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...dc0de683f13c02

Congrats, that ms one in a million. Most of the people of SB are content sellers. Keep up the hard work!

[TA992]

Manisha / Jasmyne is young but a freak. She's done threesomes with mongers from here and she will take it raw including CIP. A little annoying sometimes but you can just tune out her nonsense. Don't be a white knight and tell her about USG LOL. If you bang her, drop me a message and let me know if you like it as much as a few of us did.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...dc0de683f13c02

Is she PPM? If so what is her usual cost so nobody overpays.

[Merovingian2]

Manisha / Jasmyne is young but a freak. She's done threesomes with mongers from here and she will take it raw including CIP. A little annoying sometimes but you can just tune out her nonsense. Don't be a white knight and tell her about USG LOL. If you bang her, drop me a message and let me know if you like it as much as a few of us did.

https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...dc0de683f13c02

[Mamouna]

LOL. I don't need the argument and that * means nothing to me but "normal women" won't fuck you for 300 bucks!

She's a sex worker! Sugar babies, strippers, some masseuse, street walkers and escorts are sex workers. After a while they'll learn where to look just the same as you did. Think of how you found these type of sites.

Every sugar site I've been on list some things to do and look for to stay safe. First one is to do a phone number search! What's the odds one of you guys texted from a poon phone? Wouldn't take much to see that some of us use both sugar sites and escort sites.

I've been looking at sugar babies in anchorage at least 5 of them use the same pictures or phone numbers as they did in escorts ads. If the lady isn't high as fuck, it shouldn't be that hard to do the same basic background checks you do.

I don't quite understand everything you're saying but I agree 100% with the classification of sex work that includes sugaring. I can't prove it but in the short time I've been doing the SA route, more women are on there willing to negotiate for "short term" arrangements, aka ONS, than when I started. I know a girl who did sugaring, she was there for quick money not to find a "daddy". Maybe the fantasy is to find one, but that's like probably less than 10% of all arrangements on the site.

The fact is that sugaring is just the latest workaround to the moral hypocrisy in this country regarding sexuality and income inequality. And women like FB profit off of the illegality of sex work. It benefits them financially and so does attacking anyone who disagrees. That's why I have no moral qualms about negotiating because it has nothing to do with exploitation, it's a money grab on their part. If it was legal, prices would plummet to levels that legitimate competition would dictate. Just look at the marijuana industry, it would be the same thing. Regulated, safer, and CHEAP.

[Michael1967]

The site does come up in the first page if you Google her username.

*Shrug*.

Okay. You win this one.

[Don Quixote 2]

A "normal" woman isn't going to be sitting around reading USA Sex Guide. Yes, the site may be known to people, but it's known mainly to people that have a certain interest. Think of it like swinger web sites. People that have zero interest being a swinger don't just go there to read what's up. People that have no interest in escorts or being an escort don't come here. Hell, even escorts don't know about this place. So, she had to either be an escort or was guided here.

LOL. I don't need the argument and that * means nothing to me but "normal women" won't fuck you for 300 bucks!

She's a sex worker! Sugar babies, strippers, some masseuse, street walkers and escorts are sex workers. After a while they'll learn where to look just the same as you did. Think of how you found these type of sites.

Every sugar site I've been on list some things to do and look for to stay safe. First one is to do a phone number search! What's the odds one of you guys texted from a poon phone? Wouldn't take much to see that some of us use both sugar sites and escort sites.

I've been looking at sugar babies in anchorage at least 5 of them use the same pictures or phone numbers as they did in escorts ads. If the lady isn't high as fuck, it shouldn't be that hard to do the same basic background checks you do.

[Travelerr]

A "normal" woman isn't going to be sitting around reading USA Sex Guide. Yes, the site may be known to people, but it's known mainly to people that have a certain interest. Think of it like swinger web sites. People that have zero interest being a swinger don't just go there to read what's up. People that have no interest in escorts or being an escort don't come here. Hell, even escorts don't know about this place. So, she had to either be an escort or was guided here.

The site does come up in the first page if you Google her username.

*Shrug*.

[Michael1967]

While both of those are possible, this site and the very few like it aren't exactly a secret to anyone.

A "normal" woman isn't going to be sitting around reading USA Sex Guide. Yes, the site may be known to people, but it's known mainly to people that have a certain interest. Think of it like swinger web sites. People that have zero interest being a swinger don't just go there to read what's up. People that have no interest in escorts or being an escort don't come here. Hell, even escorts don't know about this place. So, she had to either be an escort or was guided here.

[BoBroBgobs]

So, if she knew about this site then either:

1. Some asshole White Knight told her about this site and sent her here.

2. She was already a hooker and knew about it.

Didn't she have a back-and-forth here a few months ago as well?

[Don Quixote 2]

So, if she knew about this site then either:

1. Some asshole White Knight told her about this site and sent her here.

2. She was already a hooker and knew about it.

While both of those are possible, this site and the very few like it aren't exactly a secret to anyone.

[Michael1967]

Too bad no one can read this. Nobody will be contacting you now! But then again you already have a negative reputation on here so I don't really need to reiterate it.

So, if she knew about this site then either:

1. Some asshole White Knight told her about this site and sent her here.

2. She was already a hooker and knew about it.

[Money420]

Too bad no one can read this. Nobody will be contacting you now! But then again you already have a negative reputation on here so I don't really need to reiterate it.