Thread: Sugarbabies?
+
Add Report
Results 1,561 to 1,575 of 9217
-
04-18-23 19:23 #7657Senior Member

Posts: 200Sorry
My bad, haven't messed with html since *******.
Originally Posted by Phlasher
[View Original Post]
-
04-18-23 19:11 #7656Senior Member

Posts: 98Nothing nefarious
This is all very standard html coding. Meta name="robots" is nothing more than instructions for search engines to index the site. All the rest references style sheets to control display and javascripts that add funtionality.
Originally Posted by BedtimeStory
[View Original Post]
-
04-18-23 19:10 #7655Senior Member

Posts: 1897Werfunfun
She is 41, married in the Hamilton / Eaton area. She has profiles on multiple sites. She recently sent me a message on SB implying that she may have been the one to get me banned on Seeking. I immediately blocked her or I would share a link. She appears to be extremely touchy. She seemed most upset that I asked to meet for lunch or coffee but was unwilling to send a picture showing my face. I recommend you approach with caution - if at all.
BAM.
-
04-18-23 17:17 #7654Senior Member

Posts: 158Anyone have any tips on seeking ladies who are actually able to host in north cinci, ideally near mason / wc? Or just ladies relatively around that part of town? The universal rule of seeking seems to be all the ladies I hit it off with are deep in the west side and don't drive and I have to add Uber and hotel to the mix. Happy to share what I've stumbled across.
-
04-18-23 17:04 #7653Senior Member

Posts: 200Good call
Looking at the source code for this page reveals "robot" in the meta data.
Originally Posted by BamBam
[View Original Post]
}</ script <meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow"link href="/0. 526 b6 a0393 b95207 bbad. Css?526 b6 a0393 b95207 bbad" rel="stylesheet"link href="/ main. 526 b6 a0393 b95207 bbad. Css?526 b6 a0393 b95207 bbad" rel="stylesheet"head <body <div I'd="reactApp" style="height: 100%div <script src="https://store.real-gifts.com/scripts/realgifts.js"script <script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/li...plepeer.min.js"script <script window. AddEventListener ("appinstalled", function () {.
If (window. DataLayer) {.
Window. DataLayer. Push (Event: "pwa_installed".
actually on second look the above may reference the cloudflare and the eventlister urls on the page
-
04-18-23 14:04 #7652Senior Member

Posts: 2243BraveActress
Maybe, whomever this is, figured out there is an untapped niche of guys into mindless girls who incoherently ramble.
Originally Posted by JLZ61
[View Original Post]
-
04-18-23 13:41 #7651Senior Member

Posts: 1897BraveActress
ChatGPT would do a much better job. LOL! That profile is a classic Asian Crypto-scammer.
Originally Posted by JLZ61
[View Original Post]
BAM.
-
04-18-23 13:09 #7650Senior Member

Posts: 148Alternate Thread
I would 100% agree with this. SA is awesome and you get a lot of contacts, but sometimes I just need to add 1 or 2 to the rotation. I've been hesitant to pursue WYP or SB just due to the lack of info on here as compared to SA. Would love more dialog regarding the other sites. If we get it started I'll contribute as I have with SA before.
Originally Posted by BamBam
[View Original Post]
-
04-18-23 10:14 #7649Senior Member

Posts: 602All I can say is.
Wow. This one has got to be one of the weirdest ones I've seen. Pic is likely from Europe but I can't quite make out the words.
https://members.seeking.com/member/e...2-d993505bfe6b
About Me.
I want you, to my heart pain, I want your flame like smile, want your flexible waist, your hair on the corner of the flying star; I fell in the intoxicated atmosphere, like an island, in the python green sea between the ups and downs, involuntary.
"flexible waist"?
"python green sea"?
ChatGPT?? If so, we've got nothing to worry about from AI. LOL.
-
04-17-23 19:23 #7648Senior Member

Posts: 1897Sarahbabe444 and jayyt22
I'm not sure. I agree there is a facial similarity but ages and heights are different. More importantly, there are multiple tattoos on Jay's pictures that do not appear in any of the ones on Sarah's profile. Could they be sisters?? In any case neither one has engaged with me.
Originally Posted by WanderingAbout
[View Original Post]
There are multiple profiles that are on the site more than once. I wonder if they are just testing different approaches. I doubt they would let men get away with that.
BAM.
-
04-17-23 16:03 #7647Senior Member

Posts: 2243Sarahbabe444 jayyt22
Same girl two different profiles or unicorn twins.
Sarahbabe444. https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...289b915cdf56a4
Jayyt22. https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...ecec47ce1873dd
-
04-17-23 15:00 #7646Senior Member

Posts: 827I'm with Bam on This
I agree, I have been reading their thread and like it. It does filter out some of the noise. It's more targeted. Great idea Bam.
Originally Posted by BamBam
[View Original Post]
-
04-17-23 14:29 #7645Senior Member

Posts: 1897SCAMMER, FAKE or NPC??
Here are some profiles that trigger my caution mode.
HardDeep
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...PmKnAL4ybGMq9; The picture is of the porn star Karlee Grey. No profile content.
Avis502
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...2Yk606jWqempk; age-pic mismatch. Profile written in the third person. TGTBT.
Empressdivine
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...6M6457DLlYvQg; Reported on earlier. Using very old pics, Actual age is early 60's. She is real but just don't!
Mansonm
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...f400ca487e9ea; TGTBT,. High probability to be using pictures of some porn star. Only three elements in attributes-big red flag.
Japmorgan
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...a30e7bb6e4771; TGTBT. Minimal profile content, three elements in attributes.
Marissa_599
https://www.secretbenefits.com/next/...fb90be7e407c8; Asian. Only two pics look like they might be local. Full attributes but 5'8" for an Asian girl? Inconclusive.
I will update later with a list of profiles that appear to have wasted my credits.
BAM
-
04-17-23 14:12 #7644Senior Member

Posts: 1897Alternate Sugar Sites
I am putting this out thee for comment. The Columbus forum started a separate sugar thread just for SB and WYP. I suppose there might also be others. In any case, they did it to help avoid clogging the regular thread with a lot of irrelevant chatter. I think the people using the alternate sites could benefit from a higher degree of info exchange to help avoid wasting credits. What say the men on this thread?
BAM.
-
04-16-23 12:31 #7643Senior Member

Posts: 1897Amor Fati
Thanks for the kind words. Glad to see you step up. I have been experimenting with both SB and WYP during my hiatus from Seeking. The challenge on both sites is avoiding wasting money on profiles that will never engage. I used to puzzle how there could be so many SB profiles with videos that never responded. I now suspect the site is copying out of area profiles and duplicating them. No proof of this but I notice the occasional profile that appears in my local search that have a location pretty far away.
Originally Posted by BedtimeStory
[View Original Post]
It requires discipline to avoid spending money on hot looking profiles that keep popping up but if they do not look at your profile, it is almost certain they are either not interested or not real. I may join you in starting to capture the dry holes to help others avoid wasting money.
I actually met one of the profiles on your list: amorxfati. She posts on all the sugar sites. We did a MnG about a year ago when I was still on Seeking. She is older than her pictures suggest. She wanted 600 ppm. I got the impression she mostly targets visiting business men. She is still a handsome woman but not worth what she is asking. Someone who sees her only once is not going to know that.
BAM.









Reply With Quote




