Escort Reports

**KingOfFours** · 03-15-23 09:55

Originally Posted by JohannJohann [View Original Post]

I'm sure some officers take advantage of the job, but I can't see that being legal in any capacity. Isn't prostitution what they're trying to prosecute in the first place? I bet if evidence was provided by a sex worker (photos, video, physical evidence, etc.), there would be some legal ramifications for the police. At least the case would probably be thrown out of court.

It is apparently quite legal in some states:

https://slate.com/human-interest/201...-trust-us.html

Again, though, members of the bar in MA and RI, who have access to the actual public court records and the actual data bases of state statutes: PLEASE step up to the plate here, and POST THEM!

**Style20** · 03-15-23 08:15

Originally Posted by Sensei22 [View Original Post]

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...v/196069446948

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...a/467392709499

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...b/788927984737

All these ads are coincidentally from same location and all of them text you back however they prefer not to talk on the phone they look very attractive but they don't seemed very real. Has anyone partake here?

Those are all Brazilian ads. That's how they advertise with fake pics and a lot of guys do toftt. But I will never go knowing one day cops will use Brazilian fake pics like that to bust people. So if I was you. I would think before I see anyone like that specially with the address on their ads also.

**Watson1017** · 03-15-23 02:17

Originally Posted by YoungInRi [View Original Post]

https://skipthegames.com/posts/pawtu...-/531122821565

Hey all,

I know I've seen this one reviewed before but I can't remember her name to search. So if anyone could remind me or even give their two cents, that'd be great.

I see an addict screaming out for help! But TOFT!

**YoungInRi** · 03-15-23 01:25

https://skipthegames.com/posts/pawtu...-/531122821565

Hey all,

I know I've seen this one reviewed before but I can't remember her name to search. So if anyone could remind me or even give their two cents, that'd be great.

**MrMissedHer** · 03-14-23 22:33

Originally Posted by Sensei22 [View Original Post]

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...v/196069446948

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...a/467392709499

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...b/788927984737

All these ads are coincidentally from same location and all of them text you back however they prefer not to talk on the phone they look very attractive but they don't seemed very real. Has anyone partake here?

There is no such thing as a coincidence in this hobby. Use the big head on this and don't waste your time. None of those are real and all of them scream scam. I know it seems hard now, but keep reading the forum, keep paying attention and in time you will learn how to "read between the lines".

**JohannJohann** · 03-14-23 21:32

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

From my understanding, the issue of whether police are permitted to have sex during a sting is state-specific.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/59mb...arresting-them

Nevertheless, what is said here without actual documentation, and what is really true, that is, what the statutes and court records actually indicate, are basically unrelated.

So what I would like to see, is some members of either the RI or MA bar associations chime in here, and provide direct links or quotes from the state statutes and court records themselves. I'm quite sure that, out of the hundreds, maybe thousands, of mongers that read these RI and MA forums, at least a few are lawyers! (And maybe even some judges and prosecutors)!

So, please chime in here, counselors, and post some actual links to official documents, OK? Then we can all understand what is REALLY the case!

I'm sure some officers take advantage of the job, but I can't see that being legal in any capacity. Isn't prostitution what they're trying to prosecute in the first place? I bet if evidence was provided by a sex worker (photos, video, physical evidence, etc.), there would be some legal ramifications for the police. At least the case would probably be thrown out of court.

**RifireDog** · 03-14-23 15:36

Hey Adobe,

I agree with you and you definitely make a valid point. I am nothing but respectful and courteous when I speak to a provider or meet them. I just thought she was definitely very quick to say no to my question. I'm not one to question what a provider thinks she's worth, if it seems out of price range I politely thank them for their time answering my questions and tell them I can't meet their price range at this time and when I can I'll contact them. I have reached out to the Pawtucket girl again and she has seemed to drop her prices a little and said she would allow a second pop in an HR visit now. So I'm wondering if she just hasn't had any luck with business with the price range and one pop rule initially. I hope you stay safe brother.

Originally Posted by Adobe [View Original Post]

It took me a while, but I figured out why some girls insist on 1 nut (one pop, one cup of coffe, one time, LOL) only. It's because some providers worry that if you don't get the second one, a guy will either ask for some of the fee back or else will insist on just another few minutes more. . . Almost there, honey, can you try for another 5 minutes?

Yes, it's also true that lots of guys will politely thank a lady for trying to draw a second nut out during the hour, but I bet just as many guys would blame the lady for their inability to squeeze out another nut.

Of course, a 2nd pop is more effort than the first one. And the promise of a 2nd cup on the menu means that some guys who would "pop-and-go" after 15 minutes will use up the full hour. And let's not forget the wear and tear on the vajayjay and / or a lady's mouth and jaw. So there are some decent reasons for refusing a 2nd pop. Some of us have even asked about a 2nd pop and then left soon after the first one, once the crazy-making juice has erupted out of our nutsack..

**Sensei22** · 03-14-23 14:11

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...v/196069446948

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...a/467392709499

https://skipthegames.com/posts/provi...b/788927984737

All these ads are coincidentally from same location and all of them text you back however they prefer not to talk on the phone they look very attractive but they don't seemed very real. Has anyone partake here?

**Damian11** · 03-14-23 12:29

Last time I've seen blonde MILF from pawtucket post was about 9 years ago. Anyone know what happened to her or where she went?

**KingOfFours** · 03-14-23 09:59

From my understanding, the issue of whether police are permitted to have sex during a sting is state-specific.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/59mb...arresting-them

Nevertheless, what is said here without actual documentation, and what is really true, that is, what the statutes and court records actually indicate, are basically unrelated.

So what I would like to see, is some members of either the RI or MA bar associations chime in here, and provide direct links or quotes from the state statutes and court records themselves. I'm quite sure that, out of the hundreds, maybe thousands, of mongers that read these RI and MA forums, at least a few are lawyers! (And maybe even some judges and prosecutors)!

So, please chime in here, counselors, and post some actual links to official documents, OK? Then we can all understand what is REALLY the case!

**Two12** · 03-13-23 23:29

Originally Posted by Partimer109 [View Original Post]

The law changed LE does not have to tell you they are LE anymore, so if I took my girlfriend out or met her in a room and had sex it's legal and if I was to also give her money afterwards because she needed help with rent, bills etc. that is not illegal. Also I'm helping my girlfriend it's a loan. First thing that should happen is a quick LE check a quick touch of any private part, like I'm meeting an old girlfriend lightly and real quick, this action is not illegal for both parties so it's mutual, unless you were not discreet in phone texting saying things that could prove you guilty if that is the case then they will nab you on the spot.

Could not have said it better, brother. That particular sheriff, I recall, was from AZ. As for the police lying to you, it's a law that was enacted about 10 years ago; the courts refer to it as, get this, role-playing, talk about a play on words LOL. What this brother is saying is correct. So it is a waste of time asking a provider or a provider asking you — Are you a cop or affiliated with any law enforcement or its agencies? Complete waste of time. The coppers are only role-playing. When Im even asked that by text I immediately say GOODBYE. But also, as the informative brother said, if you do not text or talk about anything ya should not that will incriminate you, you should be all right; otherwise you will be nabbed right away. Play safe and think with the bigger head. Ya know, the one atop your shoulders. No ass is worth the shame, embarrassment, or court issues. Nope. Play safe. Think before you speak. And if your Spidey senses tingle then do not dare to mingle. Peace.

**Partimer109** · 03-13-23 18:37

Originally Posted by Sounds [View Original Post]

Supposedly there is some cop or sheriff out west (AZ or CA) that has a reputation for doing that sort of shit.

The law changed LE does not have to tell you they are LE anymore, so if I took my girlfriend out or met her in a room and had sex it's legal and if I was to also give her money afterwards because she needed help with rent, bills etc. that is not illegal. Also I'm helping my girlfriend it's a loan. First thing that should happen is a quick LE check a quick touch of any private part, like I'm meeting an old girlfriend lightly and real quick, this action is not illegal for both parties so it's mutual, unless you were not discreet in phone texting saying things that could prove you guilty if that is the case then they will nab you on the spot.

**HornyApe9999** · 03-13-23 18:03

Also known as screening, a cop check involves mutual groping. Just a quick squeeze of the tit and / or palming a ball sack. In order for police to get a conviction during a sting they need audio and / or video surveillance of the incident. With that knowledge you can insist on a cop check, an undercover cop or CI cannot engage in sexual contact with a suspect, without catching charges themselves. And since the surveillance must be intact they have to abide the law in their sting.

It's saved me once for sure (may 2022 seekonk) maybe 3 times overall.

So when in doubt, whip it out. LOL.

HA.

**Sounds** · 03-13-23 15:50

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

So, what is a cop check, and does that actually deter cops, or what? Because cops can and do lie, and there are no rules for them, if they can get away with it. Case in point: I inseminated the agency girl in the pics about 20 years ago, who is now long retired. The last time I cum-pumped her was in the Boston Park Plaza hotel. I likely dumped at least a dozen loads in her, including once in a CIP threesome, and so I got to know her pretty well, had some dinners with her, and even got some freebes. She told me that a cop once came to her room, gave her the cash, got a BBBJCIM, and then showed the badge, and busted her! I do not know what went down after that, but she had absolutely no reason to lie to me. Have any of you guys had any of the hoes you know well, ever tell you about anything like that? I just wonder how widespread that sort of aggressive corruption is?

Supposedly there is some cop or sheriff out west (AZ or CA) that has a reputation for doing that sort of shit.

**Adobe** · 03-13-23 15:49

Originally Posted by RifireDog [View Original Post]

Hey all, it's been a while. I was in the mood for a thick girl decided to try and set something up with this one in pawt. Seems to be flexible like she says from previous post pics. Very friendly via text however she wanted 350 for full hr GFE. Told her can't do it to expensive she stopped to 275 GFE full hr. She normally charges 300 for hour then extra 50 for GFE. I figured fine I'm pretty horny why not, she hosts in a highrise next to highway, seemed safe enough. But when I asked if she allowed multiple pops in the hour she said no not atll. That was the deal breaker for me. No way am I paying 275 for 1 nut that to be honest will come out in about 5 minutes. So I backed out and took care of myself. Post nut clarity hit and probably was a good option. Hope this helps, stay safe gents.

https://skipthegames.com/posts/pawtu...l/060270446625

It took me a while, but I figured out why some girls insist on 1 nut (one pop, one cup of coffe, one time, LOL) only. It's because some providers worry that if you don't get the second one, a guy will either ask for some of the fee back or else will insist on just another few minutes more. . . Almost there, honey, can you try for another 5 minutes?

Yes, it's also true that lots of guys will politely thank a lady for trying to draw a second nut out during the hour, but I bet just as many guys would blame the lady for their inability to squeeze out another nut.

Of course, a 2nd pop is more effort than the first one. And the promise of a 2nd cup on the menu means that some guys who would "pop-and-go" after 15 minutes will use up the full hour. And let's not forget the wear and tear on the vajayjay and / or a lady's mouth and jaw. So there are some decent reasons for refusing a 2nd pop. Some of us have even asked about a 2nd pop and then left soon after the first one, once the crazy-making juice has erupted out of our nutsack.

Here's a strategy that you might consider: When you're asking the lady about the possibility of a 2nd nut, make sure to tell her that you totally understand if it doesn't happen and that you just want your full time in case it might. Definitely let her know that if you're not "up" to it, you won't stick around until the very last minute, but that since you're paying for an hour, you want to make sure she doesn't try to rush you out after you nut. Other than a few well regarded massage providers, it's obvious that from their perspective -- the perspective of any woman who's ever understood a) men, especially younger men, can be greedy for multiple nuts, and b) men can be pissy when the nut doesn't happen -- that they think we're simple creatures who should be happy after the release. Maybe we are. But it's got to be awkward when a guy wants to try for a 2nd pop and because of his age or physical condition, there's no way he's going to be able to manage it, and you know that fact as well as he should.

So, yeah, give 'them a heads-up that you won't be a jerk about it, and many ladies will agree to a recovery break after the first pop and then to give honest effort to drawing out a second one.

Just my 2 cents.

Adobe.